Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins on Special Ballot Forum-16: Election of CA/Browser Forum Vice Chair

TrustCor votes YES on Special Ballot Forum-16. Regards, Neil On 22/10/2020 03:15, Dean Coclin via Public wrote: > > Voting begins on this ballot below: > >   > > > The following motion has been proposed by the CA/Browser Forum Chair > Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA. > > > Purpose of

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins on Special Ballot Forum-15: Election of CA/Browser Forum Chair

TrustCor votes YES on Special Ballot Forum-15 Regards, Neil On 14/09/2020 16:11, Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Public wrote: > > Voting begins for Special Ballot Forum-15. > > Dimitris. > > > On 2020-09-07 8:53 μ.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) wrote: >> >> >> The following motion has

Re: [cabfpub] VOTING BEGINS: Ballot Forum-14 version 2: Creation of S/MIME Certificates Working Group

TrustCor votes YES to ballot Forum-14v2 Thanks, Neil On 08/06/2020 21:51, Tim Hollebeek via Public wrote: > > The following ballot is proposed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and > endorsed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and Clint Wilson of Apple. > >   > > Ballot Forum-14: Creation of S/MIME

Re: [cabfpub] Voting Begins for ballot Forum-12 - Update CA/B Forum Bylaws

TrustCor votes "YES" to Ballot Forum-12 Regards, Neil On 18/05/2020 16:30, Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Public wrote: The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA and endorsed by Mike Reilly of Microsoft and Tim Hollebeek of Digicert. *Purpose of

Re: [cabfpub] VOTING BEGINS: BALLOT Forum 13: Correct Code Signing Certificate Working Group Charter error

TrustCor votes YES to Ballot Forum-13 Regards, Neil On 01/04/2020 01:00, Dean Coclin via Public wrote: Voting begins on Ballot Forum 13 Start Time: March 31, 2020 8:00pm Eastern End Time: April 7, 2020 8:00pm Eastern *From:*Public *On Behalf Of *Dean Coclin via Public *Sent:* Tuesday,

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot Forum-11: Creation of S/MIME Certificates Working Group

TrustCor votes to abstain on Ballot Forum-11. TrustCor does not oppose the establishment of a working group to examine the requirements for a solid S/MIME foundation, but the current discussions have indicated that there is no likelihood for consensus on the current path, despite the sterling

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot FORUM-10: Re-charter Forum Infrastructure Working Group

TrustCor votes YES on Ballot FORUM-10 Regards, Neil > On 30 Sep 2019, at 16:27, Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public > wrote: > > The following ballot is proposed by Jos Purvis of Cisco, endorsed by Wayne > Thayer of Mozilla and Ben Wilson of DigiCert. Voting begins at 2100 UTC 30 > September

Re: [cabfpub] Voting Begins: Ballot FORUM-8: Charter to Establish a Code Signing Certificate Working Group

TrustCor votes “YES” on ballot FORUM-8. Regards, Neil > On 1 Mar 2019, at 17:22, Ben Wilson via Public wrote: > > I hereby announce that Voting Begins on the following ballot and that > DigiCert affirmatively votes "Yes": > > > > > > Ballot FORUM-8: Charter to Establish a Code Signing

Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC10 – Establishing the Network Security Subcommittee of the SCWG

TrustCor votes YES on ballot SC10 Regards, Neil > On 28 Sep 2018, at 01:25, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: > > Voting ends on 4 October 2018 at 22:00 UTC. > > From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org > ] On Behalf Of Dimitris >

Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot SC9 – Establish the Validation Subcommittee of the SCWG

TrustCor votes YES on Ballot SC9 Regards, Neil > On 26 Sep 2018, at 19:03, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: > > Voting has started on this ballot, and will end on October 3 at 16:00 UTC > > From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org >

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot Forum-2 - Chair and Vice-Chair Term Extensions

TrustCor votes YES on Ballot Forum-2. Regards, Neil > On 5 Sep 2018, at 21:35, Ben Wilson via Public wrote: > > Ballot Forum-2 - Chair and Vice-Chair Term Extensions > > Ben Wilson of DigiCert calls the following proposed ballot to be published > for discussion and comment by the CABF

Re: [cabfpub] [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC6 v3 - Revocation Timeline Extension

TrustCor votes YES on Ballot SC6v3. Regards, Neil > On 31 Aug 2018, at 20:51, Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg > wrote: > > Here is version 3 of this ballot, incorporating changes to v2 suggested by > Bruce and Ryan (thanks!). > > I noticed that our current bylaws have reverted back to a

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot SC8: Election of Server Certificate Working Group Chair

TrustCor votes YES on Ballot SC8. Regards, Neil > On 30 Aug 2018, at 16:01, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: > > Ballot SC8: Election of Server Certificate Working Group Chair – Term Nov. > 1, 2018 – Oct. 31, 2020 > > > -Motion begins- > > In accordance with Bylaw 4.1(c), Dimitris

Re: [cabfpub] VOTING BEGINS: Ballot FORUM-1: Establish Forum Infrastructure Working Group

TrustCor votes YES on ballot FORUM-1 Regards, Neil > On 20 Aug 2018, at 15:11, Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public > wrote: > > I didn’t receive any further updates to this ballot by the end of the > discussion period, so the voting period for this ballot is formally opened. > It concludes at

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot SC3 version 2

TrustCor Systems votes YES on Ballot SC3 version 2 Regards, Neil > On 9 Aug 2018, at 16:48, Tim Hollebeek via Public wrote: > > > https://github.com/cabforum/documents/compare/SC3-PasswordChangesDieDieDie?expand=1 > >

Re: [cabfpub] [Servercert-wg] Voting Begins: Ballot SC2 - version 2: Validating certificates via CAA CONTACT

TrustCor votes YES on ballot SC2. Regards, Neil > On 19 Jul 2018, at 16:02, Tim Hollebeek via Servercert-wg > wrote: > > > Administrivia: > > This ballot is being cross-posted to the CABF public mailing in line with the > consensus from last Thursday’s call that it is important everyone

Re: [cabfpub] **List of CABF Members, Associate Members, and Interested Parties who have declared their "participation" in the Server Certificate Working Group - please check for your name**

TrustCor declares its participation in the Server Certificate Working Group, and has updated the wiki accordingly (the IPRA having been signed some time ago). Regards, Neil > On 7/4/2018 2:23 AM, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: >> As noted in my prior emails, as of the Ballot 206 effective date

[cabfpub] Final report from the NetSec group

Colleagues, Following on from the F2F discussions in London, where a report on the Network Security activity was sought, I’m attaching our final report. The TL;DR is essentially: * We recognise that the NCSSRs are a bit outdated and don’t call out salient security features of today’s working

Re: [cabfpub] Voting Begins: Ballot 221: Two-Factor Authentication and Password Improvements

TrustCor votes YES on Ballot 221 Regards, Neil > On 17 May 2018, at 22:47, Tim Hollebeek via Public > wrote: > > > Ballot 221: Two-Factor Authentication and Password Improvements > > Purpose of Ballot: The Network Security Working Group met a number of times > to >

Re: [cabfpub] Discussion Period: Ballot 224: WHOIS and RDAP

TrustCor votes YES to ballot 224 Regards, Neil > On 3 May 2018, at 12:02, Wayne Thayer via Public wrote: > > Ballot 224: WHOIS and RDAP > > Purpose of Ballot: The Registry Data Access Protocol (RDAP) is the successor > to WHOIS, and this ballot adds explicit support

Re: [cabfpub] Voting Begins: Ballot 219 v2: Clarify handling of CAA Record Sets with no "issue"/"issuewild" property tag

TrustCor votes YES on Ballot 219. Regards, Neil > On 3 Apr 2018, at 17:13, Corey Bonnell via Public wrote: > > Ballot 219 v2: Clarify handling of CAA Record Sets with no > "issue"/"issuewild" property tag > > Purpose of this ballot: > > RFC 6844 contains an ambiguity

Re: [cabfpub] Voting Begins: Ballot 220: Minor Cleanups (Spring 2018)

TrustCor votes YES on Ballot 220. Regards, Neil > On 23 Mar 2018, at 10:40, Tim Hollebeek via Public > wrote: > > > Ballot 220: Minor Cleanups (Spring 2018) > > Purpose of Ballot: This ballot corrects two incorrect cross-references and > one terminology error. > >

Re: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot 218 version 2

TrustCor votes YES on Ballot 218. Neil > On 30 Jan 2018, at 17:03, Rich Smith via Public wrote: > > Comodo CA votes YES on Ballot 218. ___ Public mailing list Public@cabforum.org https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 216: Update Discussion Period Process

TrustCor votes YES on Ballot 216. Regards, Neil > On 12 Dec 2017, at 18:51, Gervase Markham via Public > wrote: > > [Updated endorsers, 2nd attempt. Timeline unchanged.] > > Ballot 216: Update Discussion Period Process > Purpose of Ballot: The current voting procedures

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 217: Sunset RFC 2527

TrustCor votes YES on Ballot 217 Regards, Neil > On 7 Dec 2017, at 16:52, Ryan Sleevi via Public wrote: > > Ballot 217: Sunset RFC 2527 > > Purpose of Ballot: The Baseline Requirements and Extended Validation > Guidelines require that CA's disclosures of the Certificate

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 215 - Fix Ballot 190 Errata

TrustCor votes YES on Ballot 215. Regards, Neil > From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via > Public > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 5:48 PM > To: CABFPub > Subject: [cabfpub] Ballot 215 - Fix Ballot 190 Errata > > Ballot 215 -

Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot 190

TrustCor votes YES on Ballot 190. Neil > On 12 Sep 2017, at 23:23, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: > > Voting has started on Ballot 190 as proposed on Sept 5 (see bottom of this > message, and attachments), as amended by my email from Sept. 11 (see > immediately below).

Re: [cabfpub] Definitions of Air Gapped and Offline Systems

Valid point. I suspect that many of us are operating from an intuitive notion of “Well, of course there must be a security perimeter”, which surreptitiously assumes everyone’s preferred private definition of *their* current perimeter. From a Root CA perspective, I would have thought that there

[cabfpub] Definitions of Air Gapped and Offline Systems

In the NetSec group, we’re updating the definitions suitable to Root CA systems, so that the definitions are both practical and robust. We’d like to solicit opinions from the broader public list. In particular, we’re looking at the definitions of “Offline” and “Air Gapped” systems, which apply

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 212: Canonicalise formal name of the Baseline Requirements

TrustCor votes YES on ballot 212. Neil > On 1 Sep 2017, at 01:40, Stephen Davidson via Public > wrote: > > QuoVadis votes yes. > Stephen > > > From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase > Markham via Public > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017

Re: [cabfpub] Voting on Ballot 210: NetSec Changes ends Thurs at 22:00 UTC

TrustCor votes YES on ballot 210 > On 28 Aug 2017, at 16:42, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: > > Voting on Ballot 210: NetSec Changes ends Thurs, Aug. 31 at 22:00 UTC – > please vote now > > From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org >

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 210: Misc. Changes to the Network and Certificate System Security Requirements

> On 15 Aug 2017, at 17:08, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > > The challenge, which I think is worth articulating even as I try to form a > suggestion, is that it creates ambiguity as to what's "sufficiently not > stupid". > > For example: Is a physical host running a hypervisor

Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 202 - Underscore and Wildcard Characters

TrustCor votes ‘YES’ on Ballot 202 Neil ___ Public mailing list Public@cabforum.org https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public