Hi Carsten,
On 2/22/2012 12:02 PM, Carsten Keßler wrote:
Dear LODers,
we are currently working on a project for the United Nations Office
for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in Geneva to
develop a Humanitarian Exchange Language (HXL). Some information about
the project is
Hi Carsten,
On 2/22/2012 5:51 PM, Carsten Keßler wrote:
Hi Bob,
At a first glance, your ontology looks very interesting and well designed.
thanks, we are doing our best ;)
So there might be the (rather old) need for
statement identifiers, i.e., a URI (or maybe also a bnode) for
Hi all,
Generally, a huge +1 for implementing this issue @ Facebook!
On 9/23/2011 5:14 PM, Søren Roug wrote:
If you pull the schema http://graph.facebook.com/schema/user then you'll see
they are thinking about making a lot more properties available than what's sent
out now.
See also
Just an example from practise:
http://blog.seevl.net/2011/08/18/about-json-ld-and-content-negotiation/
near the end of this blog post:
... Then, we save costs. - that's it! ;)
Cheers,
Bo
Hi,
On 6/17/2011 4:11 PM, Leigh Dodds wrote:
Hi,
On 17 June 2011 14:04, Tim Berners-Leeti...@w3.org wrote:
On 2011-06 -17, at 08:51, Ian Davis wrote:
...
Quite. When a facebook user clicks the Like button on an IMDB page
they are expressing an opinion about the movie, not the page.
BUT
Hi Frans,
you can try the RDFa serializer plugin [1] of ARC [2] (written in PHP).
Albeit, the results do not look really nice by this basis serialization.
Generally, you will need customized templates for specific
serialization, e.g., this on of FOAF profiles.
You can check the ARC RDFa
Hi Martin,
On 4/22/2011 6:18 PM, Martin Hepp wrote:
So our only disagreement seems to be about having the cardinality info in the
label, and I think that, at least for the moment, that is the better choice as
compared to the alternatives.
I really don't understand why you need this
Hi Ed,
this topic was recently discussed in the Semantic Web community [1] and
the REST community [2,3] as well. It might be an interesting read re.
this topic.
Cheers,
Bob
[1]
http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/2763/the-relation-of-linked-datasemantic-web-to-rest
[2]
Hi Frans,
re. URI design patterns, I would highly recommend you to have a look at
a presentation that describes how they are doing it at BBC [1].
Furthermore, I asked a question on SemanticOverflow (now
answers.semanticweb.com) some time ago that deals with URI template
specifications for
Hi Glenn,
thanks a lot for your insightful thoughts. I think, I can fully agree to
them. This topic reminds me a bit of a question I stated some time ago
on SemanticOverflow (now answers.semanticweb.com):
When should I use explicit/anonymous defined inverse properties? [1]
(btw, this
Hi Bernard,
On 4/1/2011 3:59 PM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Maybe I missed something, but can someone tell me what the URI of the
ontology of dbpedia is?
please have a look at http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Ontology
Cheers,
Bob
Hi,
On 14.03.2011 22:42, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
Bob,
On 14 Mar 2011, at 10:47, Bob Ferris wrote:
Am 14.03.2011 11:13, schrieb Richard Cyganiak:
The abandoned PhD project type of ontology or vocabulary has no community
around it. Therefore, one gains very little by re-using it.
...
I can
Hello everybody,
Am 14.03.2011 09:28, schrieb Martin Hepp:
Hi Dieter:
There are several ontology repositories available on-line, but to my knowledge
they all suffer from two serious limitations:
1. They do not rate ontologies by quality/relevance/popularity, so you do not
get any hint
Am 14.03.2011 11:13, schrieb Richard Cyganiak:
On 14 Mar 2011, at 09:15, Bob Ferris wrote:
2. The selection of ontologies listed is, to say the best, often biased or
partly a random choice. I do not know any repository that
- lists more non-toy ontologies than abandoned PhD project prototypes
Hi Dieter,
there are several threads on SemanticOverflow that are dealing with this
topic, e.g., this one [1]
Cheers,
Bob
[1]
http://www.semanticoverflow.com/questions/1039/where-can-i-find-useful-ontologies
Am 13.03.2011 17:15, schrieb Dieter Fensel:
Dear all,
for a number of
Hello again,
an issue that is strongly related to the raised concern is ontology
marketing:
I think, personal advice is still the best one here. It's horrible to
find appropriate ontologies month after intensive searches, because they
are hidden well in our universal information space. I
Congrats Pierre, well done!
This might hopefully become a quite useful resource. Any plans to
publish this information itself as Semantic Web Linked Data?
Cheers,
Bob
Am 28.02.2011 19:55, schrieb Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche:
Hello all,
you have already encountered problems of SPARQL
...@mondeca.com
Website: www.mondeca.com http://www.mondeca.com/
Blog: Leçons de choses http://mondeca.wordpress.com/
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Bob Ferris z...@elbklang.net
mailto:z...@elbklang.net wrote:
Congrats Pierre, well done!
This might hopefully become a quite useful
Hi Annika,
Am 25.02.2011 23:19, schrieb Annika Flemming:
- no rede finition of existing vocabularies - sometimes it necessary
e.g., to achieve an OWL DL compiliance of an utilized vocabulary that
doesn't fulfil this requirement originally
Oh ok, I didn't know that, thanks!
See e.g. a related
be strict when sending and tolerant when receiving [1]
I guess, we shouldn't expect to much ;)
Cheers,
Bob
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1958
Hi,
Am 04.01.2011 13:38, schrieb Alexander Dutton:
The vCard ontology doesn't give a general property for linking a thing
to its v:VCard, which suggests to me that the only way to discover
addresses in the general case is when properties in the vCard namespace
are applied directly to people,
Hi Annika,
Our aim was to decide on a set of criteria that represent the quality
of a data source. In this document, we understand a data source as an
access point for Linked Data in the Web.
Does this mean that you consider only information services that follow
the Linked Data principles?
Hi,
I found Alternative to 303 response: Description-ID: header[1] in the
TAG mailing list archive.
Are there any parallels? ;)
Cheers,
Bob
PS: maybe someone has already mentioned this source here, however, I
didn't find any reference
[1]
Hi Mirko,
Am 14.10.2010 15:08, schrieb Mirko:
Thank you all for your helpful comments. First, let me clarify my
intention. My question aimed not so much at the (internal) storage of
the data, but really on how to publish them as Linked Data, so that they
are useful for third parties (= easy to
Hi Mirko,
well the thing is, it wouldn't really work without a form a of
reification (in my mind). There are use cases, where people prefer a
simple knowledge representation of a semantic relation, and other ones,
where people like to get a more detailed description about the semantic
Am 24.09.2010 20:36, schrieb Richard Cyganiak:
Hi Bob,
On 23 Sep 2010, at 11:19, Bob Ferris wrote:
is there a legend to the coloured cloud, which explains a bit the
coloured clusters, or did I simply missed it? (it would be nice, if
this legend is directly included in the graphic)
Good idea
Hi,
is there a legend to the coloured cloud, which explains a bit the
coloured clusters, or did I simply missed it? (it would be nice, if this
legend is directly included in the graphic)
Cheers,
Bob
Am 23.09.2010 10:09, schrieb Antoine Isaac:
Anja, Richard, (ccing the Library Linked Data
Hi Bernhard,
the Recommendation Ontology[1] provides a basic concept to represent and
describe recommendations on different levels of detail. As search can be
seen as a specific kind of recommendation (this is especially my point
of view, however, there are some similar views especially in
Hi Renaud,
your format / search result ontology looks quite interesting. However,
it might be useful, if the URI of this ontology
(http://sindice.com/vocab/search#) is dereferencable and would
furthermore provide a specification documentation.
Cheers,
Bob
Am 20.09.2010 12:36, schrieb
Hello everybody,
today I like to announce a first draft of the Recommendation
Ontology[1,2,3]. As far as I get an overview, there exists currently no
ontology, which address this purpose as I intended it.
With this ontology it should be possible to associate a recommendation
to someone or
Hi Tom,
Am 21.07.2010 19:46, schrieb Tom Morris:
[snip]
For developers that means: pick any URI that refers to the entity you mean
(any of Scarlett Johanssons above) and you'll be fine.
In practice, that is: if you're building a movie applications, always pick
the uberblic entity from The
Hi Toby,
Am 21.07.2010 13:48, schrieb Toby Inkster:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:56:05 +0200
Bob Ferrisz...@elbklang.net wrote:
How can I make sure that the value of my counter concept is of the
type xsd:Integer?
co:Counter
rdfs:subClassOf [
a owl:Restriction ;
Hi Vasiliy,
Am 20.07.2010 14:39, schrieb Vasiliy Faronov:
Bob Ferris wrote:
The second property of co:Counter is co:count, which is a simple
xsd:int based datatype property.
Any reasons for not using rdf:value[1]?
Not that it would make a lot of difference, but seems like this property
Hello everybody,
Apologies for cross-postings ;)
I've updated the specifications of the Ordered List Ontology, the
Counter Ontology and the Info Service Ontology. Furthermore, I created a
documentation for each one with examples etc. and included into these
files also a XHTML+RDFa
Hi Kingsley,
Am 16.07.2010 00:09, schrieb Kingsley Idehen:
Bob Ferris wrote:
Hello everybody,
Apologies for cross-postings ;)
I've updated the specifications of the Ordered List Ontology, the
Counter Ontology and the Info Service Ontology. Furthermore, I created
a documentation for each one
Hi Paul,
thanks a lot for your very insightful experience report about Semantic
Web, RDF and DBPedia.
(more thoughts inline)
Am 02.07.2010 17:07, schrieb Paul Houle:
Here are some of my thoughts
[skip]
(4) I'm one of the people who got interested in semantic tech because of
DBPedia,
Hi Ian,
But now people are seeing some of
the data being made available in browseable form e.g. at data.gov.uk
or dbpedia and saying, I want to make one of those.
I don't really believe that people would say after browsing dbpedia I
want to make one of those. That's not the User Experience
Hi Richard,
Such
work can not be realistically done within W3C for obvious reasons. It
has to be done outside W3C by the community.
I believe that's what the normal/standard web developers (I think
Henry Story called them Web Monkeys ;) ) do already, or?
Cheers,
Bob
Hello everybody,
I think the main issues are already discussed. Hence, here are some
summarized notes of my thoughts:
1. We shouldn't propagate that a user (always a machine or human beeing)
has to go this way and not the other one. Leaving this decision by the
user, leads to more user
Am 28.06.2010 10:17, schrieb Barry Norton:
Bob, I wrote a similar representation in WSML-Flight [1] a few years ago
[2], where it was possible to construct an axiom that for a list of
length n there should exist unique values for each of the indices 1-n,
and no others. I doubt that this is
Hi Aldo,
Hi Silvio,
Thanks a lot, Silvio, for the Colletion Ontology. I oversaw this
ontology somehow.
Am 28.06.2010 16:29, schrieb Aldo Gangemi:
Yes, I like the SWAN ontology ... I remember sometimes ago I wanted to
modularize it and submit the modules as design patterns :).
Consider that,
Hi,
Am 10.06.2010 14:34, schrieb Nathan:
Christoph LANGE wrote:
2010-06-10 13:40 Christoph LANGE ch.la...@jacobs-university.de:
in our setup we are still somehow fighting with ill-conceived legacy
URIs
from the pre-LOD age. We heavily make use of hash URIs there, so it
could
happen that a
Hello,
Apologies for cross posting ;)
Here is the Counter Ontology [1], which includes a general multiple
purpose counter concept. This concept could be uses to associate any
owl:Thing typed concept to (a) co:Counter instance(s) with the property
co:counter or a specific sub property of it
/viewvc/infoserviceonto/infoservice/trunk/gfx/infoservice.gif
[5]
http://infoserviceonto.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/infoserviceonto/infoservice/trunk/gfx/is_-_musicbrainz_example.gif
Am 19.06.2010 23:39, schrieb Bob Ferris:
Hello,
I thought this ontology might also be of interest for the lod
Hello,
I thought this ontology might also be of interest for the lod mailing.
Initially a Music Ontology issue, later a FOAF Ontology issue and now
even with a broader scope ;)
I designed yesterday the Info Service Ontology [1,2]. The initial
intention behind designing this ontology was to
Hi,
does anyone know of an already defined best practice re. using
'owl:Class and rdfs:Class' vs. 'owl:Class or rdfs:Class' type definition
for concepts in ontologies? (I've searched at ontologydesignpatterns.org
for it, but didn't found something).
For example the FOAF ontology uses both
depend on your application, use case,
practical needs, etc. However, as far as I can foresee, using both
rdfs:Class and owl:Class is perfectly safe wrt to RDF/RDFS tools and
perfectly safe wrt OWL tools.
AZ
Le 16/06/2010 12:08, Bob Ferris a écrit :
Hi,
does anyone know of an already defined
Hi Antoine,
Hi Kurt,
Hi at all from the different lists,
Am 13.06.2010 22:13, schrieb Kurt J:
Hi Antoine,
I'm very glad to have you review my ontology - apparently it had some
significant problems!
I have some comments on your ontology:
1) related to OWL DL
2) related to the use of
Hi,
I do not really understand the need for rdfs:Class:
owl:Class is already defined with rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Class (same thing
for the properties). So its is a transitivity issue and it depends on
the used reasoner to resolve that issue.
owl:Class is defined as a subclass of rdfs:Class *in
49 matches
Mail list logo
