On Mon, 2 Jun 2008, Doug Schepers wrote:
Matt Womer and I have started a new email list for discussing
geolocation. The new list, public-geolocation [1], will be archived, and
the intent is for it to be the public list for the planned Geolocation
WG:
On Tue, 27 May 2008 15:44:21 +0200, Julian Reschke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2008 14:29:16 +0200, Julian Reschke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're still avoiding the question whether the URL parameter can be an
IRI. I would assume it can't, in which
Hello webapi-wg,
The SVG WG would like to request a two week extension for reviewing the
XMLHttpRequest LC draft.
Please let us know if that is acceptable,
thanks
/Erik, (ACTION-2055)
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:33:34 +0200, Erik Dahlstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SVG WG would like to request a two week extension for reviewing the
XMLHttpRequest LC draft.
Please let us know if that is acceptable,
I think I would rather just move on given how long the review period has
Hi, Folks-
Doug Schepers wrote (on 6/3/08 10:24 AM):
From an IPR perspective, in order for a large company (or other
organization) to get involved in the WG, they would have to do a
wide-ranging (and lengthy and expensive) patent search. To join the WG,
the company's patent search would
Hi, Anne-
Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 6/3/08 9:44 AM):
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:33:34 +0200, Erik Dahlstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SVG WG would like to request a two week extension for reviewing
the XMLHttpRequest LC draft.
Please let us know if that is acceptable,
I think I would
At this point I am really confused about where to discuss geolocation
APIs, and I would rather not have it bounce back and forth. Maybe we
should just wait until the chartering process reaches its conclusion.
Regards,
Maciej
On Jun 3, 2008, at 7:24 AM, Doug Schepers wrote:
Hi, Ian-
Hi, Maciej-
Maciej Stachowiak wrote (on 6/3/08 1:53 PM):
At this point I am really confused about where to discuss geolocation
APIs, and I would rather not have it bounce back and forth. Maybe we
should just wait until the chartering process reaches its conclusion.
There's nothing to be
On Jun 3, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Doug Schepers wrote:
Hi, Maciej-
Maciej Stachowiak wrote (on 6/3/08 1:53 PM):
At this point I am really confused about where to discuss
geolocation APIs, and I would rather not have it bounce back and
forth. Maybe we should just wait until the chartering
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Doug Schepers wrote:
I think I would rather just move on given how long the review period
has been and how long we've been working on XMLHttpRequest Level 1,
but that shouldn't preclude the SVG WG from providing feedback later
on.
Noted. But this is not an
On Jun 3, 2008, at 7:12 AM, Doug Schepers wrote:
Hi, Anne-
Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 6/3/08 9:44 AM):
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:33:34 +0200, Erik Dahlstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The SVG WG would like to request a two week extension for
reviewing the XMLHttpRequest LC draft.
Please
Hey Chaals,
Could you please confirm that it is acceptable for us to begin
unofficially discussing geolocation API requirements on the
public-webapi@w3.org mailing list and for us to start noodling on ideas in
CVS in the http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/ directory? We would like
to
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:12:21 -0300, Doug Schepers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Anne-
Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 6/3/08 9:44 AM):
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:33:34 +0200, Erik Dahlstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The SVG WG would like to request a two week extension for reviewing
the
Hi, Chaals-
Charles McCathieNevile wrote (on 6/3/08 4:46 PM):
The urgency is based on the fact that people are looking to implement,
or update implementations, in part because this spec is an important
base for XHR2. We have an upcoming face to face meeting beginning 1
July, where we plan
Attached test shows that some combinations of alt modifier keys on
Windows-based machines are handled in a strangely consistent inconsistent way.
Title: Alt S repro
Lossy key combinations using the ALT modifier key on Windows-based machines
There are several scenarios that will be
Interesting findings (mostly related to IE):
This test tries to define if the HTML event handlers (onFoo) are linked to the
add/removeEventListener APIs in any way (or to define what the relationship is).
Browsers tested: Opera 9.25, Firefox 3 RC1, IE8 Beta1, Safari 3.1.1.
(on IE, I
Inline...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Maciej Stachowiak
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:44 AM
To: Doug Schepers
Cc: Web API public
Subject: Re: Dedicated Geolocation List and Channel
On Jun 3, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Doug
For the record: Where the discussion takes place is of little importance
to me and mozilla. It would make sense to me to do it here, but I'm just
as happy to discuss it elsewhere too. So I don't prefer it one place
or the other.
/ Jonas
18 matches
Mail list logo
