WebApps WG members,
This is Call for Consensus to publish a new Working Draft of the CORS
spec (with a new cors short-name):
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/
Please respond by March 6 at the latest.
As always, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence
will be
Dear Marcos,
I have some doubts that a secure transport of a widget resource is so important
in case of a signed widget resource. I would agree with you that we currently
do not know how a signature is considered because we do not have a security
framework and security policies that would
David,
Since many of WebApps' members are not familiar with OMTP and BONDI,
I have a some first order process-related questions regarding the
proposed Release Candidate (RC). I'll withhold other comments e.g
spec forking, fragmentation, etc. for now.
* Where can we find the process that
Rainer,
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Hillebrand, Rainer
rainer.hillebr...@t-mobile.net wrote:
Dear Marcos,
I have some doubts that a secure transport of a widget resource is so
important in case of a signed widget resource. I would agree with you that we
currently do not know how a
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Hillebrand, Rainer
rainer.hillebr...@t-mobile.net wrote:
Dear Marcos,
In order to detect a man-in-the-middle-attack, a widget resource is signed,
either by an author's certificate that I trust or by an author certificate
and a distributor certificate that I
Dear Marcos,
I added my comments inline.
Best Regards,
Rainer
*
T-Mobile International
Terminal Technology
Rainer Hillebrand
Head of Terminal Security
Landgrabenweg 151, D-53227 Bonn
Germany
+49 171 5211056 (My T-Mobile)
+49 228 936 13916 (Tel.)
+49 228 936
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:57:05 +0100, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
WebApps WG members,
This is Call for Consensus to publish a new Working Draft of the CORS
spec (with a new cors short-name):
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/
Please respond by March 6 at the
I have completed additional changes to the Widgets 1.0 Digital
Signatures draft:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/
Redline of recent changes
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/Overview-diff.html
Additional changes include
- change stylesheet to be for editors draft
- rewrite
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:20:52 +0900, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
I think your proposals below [1] are reasonable. If you haven't done so
already, please close the related issues and actions (or let me know if
you want me to do so.).
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1]
Hi Cameron,
Thank you very much for the response. It's very nice for us to get
your perspective.
Do you have an opinion on how disambiguation should be performed for an
ECMAScript value passed in to such an overloaded operation?
I've chatted with several engineers and researchers about this.
10 matches
Mail list logo