Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications

InkML is a development relevant to mobile Web. Tablets and other input-rich devices are gaining in acceptance (and becoming easier to purchase). InkML is one of the few specs to put forward both a stream-based and archive-oriented format. We'll be using it to serialize input between devices,

Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications

Hi Richards, Thanks for the input. Yes we are aware of the work and investigating Indian Language /Scripts Complexities on that platform also. Certainly our idea is not to redo the same work and  to address specific issues of each Indic languages. Best Regards, Somnath On 03/08/11, Richard Is

Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys

On 3/8/2011 6:12 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Pablo Castro mailto:pablo.cas...@microsoft.com>> wrote: From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org

Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Pablo Castro wrote: > > From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Keean Schupke > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:03 PM > > >> No objections here. > >> > >> Keean. > >> > >> On 8 March 2011 21:14, Jonas Sicking wrote:

RE: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys

From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Keean Schupke Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:03 PM >> No objections here. >> >> Keean. >> >> On 8 March 2011 21:14, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: >> > On Fri,

Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys

No objections here. Keean. On 8 March 2011 21:14, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Jeremy Orlow > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at

Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. >> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Keean Schupke wrote: >>> > Compound primary keys are commonly used afaik. >>> >>>

Re: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support

2011/2/23 Pablo Castro : > > From: jungs...@google.com [mailto:jungs...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jungshik > Shin (???, ???) > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 2:08 PM > > >>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >>> * Pablo Castro wrote: >>> >We discussed international languag

Re: [IndexedDB] What should be allowed as a key path?

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > As far as I recall, we never settled on how key path should be specified. >  Right now in Chrome, we allow any combination of .'s and static array > lookups.  So, for example, we allow "foo.bar[1][2].baz".  I don't remember > any specific use

[Bug 11257] Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11257 Jonas Sicking changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline March 14

On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Steve Nester wrote: > > For example; in the example within the Cross-document > messaging>Introduction section, document A calls the function causing an > event to fire in document B. Document B should either be able to call a > function causing an event to fire in document

[Bug 11564] Remove all references to manually populated indexes

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11564 Pablo Castro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 11097] [IndexedDB] Behavior of .close() is not completely specified

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11097 Jonas Sicking changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?

On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:47:47 +0100, Arun Ranganathan wrote: On 1/31/11 11:04 AM, Simon Pieters wrote: Hi, Why is FileList defined as typedef sequence FileList; rather than as an interface similar to NodeList? It seems that in Gecko and WebKit FileList is more like NodeList than as

Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Keean Schupke wrote: > Actually I am not sure now if SQLite uses BDB now (they might be moving to > it though). However BDB definitely now has an SQLite-3.0 compatible API now > and supports better concurrency, as well as AES encryption. So at the moment > looks li

Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?

On 1/31/11 11:04 AM, Simon Pieters wrote: Hi, Why is FileList defined as typedef sequence FileList; rather than as an interface similar to NodeList? It seems that in Gecko and WebKit FileList is more like NodeList than as a sequence. (In the process of going through feedback to prepa

Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases

Actually I am not sure now if SQLite uses BDB now (they might be moving to it though). However BDB definitely now has an SQLite-3.0 compatible API now and supports better concurrency, as well as AES encryption. So at the moment looks like i'm moving to using BDB instead of SQLite, (apart from when

Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Joran Greef wrote: > On 08 Mar 2011, at 7:23 AM, Dean Landolt wrote: > > > This doesn't seem right. Assuming your WebSQL implementation had all the > same indexes isn't it doing pretty much the same things as using separate > objectStores in IDB? Why would it be an

Re: CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline March 14

I have one point for consideration regarding the scope. Ref Section: Cross-document messaging Consideration- should messaging be bi-directional? For example; in the example within the Cross-document messaging>Introduction section, document A calls the function causing an event to fire in document

Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote: > That could be dealt with by adding methods like ArrayBuffer.discard(), > though... > Scratch that--discarding after postMessage is racy, since the other side could receive the object before the worker calls discard(). The object needs to b

Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications

On 08/03/2011 15:08, Somnath Chandra wrote: We have already started working on Mobile Rendering Engine and Fonts development which would enable seamless display across platforms and devices. That's interesting. Did you know about work currently under way involving Harfbuz to provide a small,

Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers

On 3/7/2011 5:04 PM, Chris Marrin wrote: On Mar 7, 2011, at 3:54 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote: On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Chris Marrin wrote: Now that ArrayBuffer has made its way into XHR, I think it would be reasonable to somehow use this new object type as a way to pass data to and from Wo

RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Ontology for Media Resource 1.0; deadline March 31

-20110308 (3) Instructions for providing feedback This W3C Working Draft version of the Ontology for Media Resources 1.0 specification incorporates requests for changes from comments sent during the first Last Call Review, as agreed with the commenters and changes following implementation

2nd Last Call Working Draft Transition announcement of the Ontology for Media Resource 1.0

Chairs and Team Contacts, (1) This is a 2nd Last Call Working Draft Transition Announcement for the following Recommendation Track specification: (2) Document Titles and URIs * Ontology for Media Resources 1.0 http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-mediaont-10-20110308 (3) Instructions for

RE: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications

Hello Dominique, Thanks a lot for your e-mail. W3C India has already initaited Mobile Web Initiative implementation in Indic langugaes. Richard's web page [link you have provided] is indeed a good starting point of discussion and provide few building blocks. While addressing the need of Indic

Re: [widget] proposal to add defaultlocale attribute to widget element (P&C Spec), I18N ACTION-18

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote: > Dear Marcos, > > [this is a reply on behalf of the Internationalization Core WG] > > We agree that not providing a default locale for a Widget is an oversight in > the Widget's localization model. The ability to provide multiple languages

[widgets] CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of Widget P&C; deadline March 15

Marcos would like to publish a new Last Call Working Draft of the Widget Packaging and Configuration spec and this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to do so: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/ The changes since the last publication (26-October-2010) are summarized in the spec: http://dev.

Re: minor comment about file extensions

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote: > Dear Webapps WG, > > This is a personal comment on the Widgets P&C draft dated 5 October 2010. I > recognize that your last call period closed, however, a colleague of mine > noticed that rule 9 at [1] defines only the ASCII alphabetic

Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases

On 8 March 2011 06:33, Joran Greef wrote: > On 08 Mar 2011, at 7:23 AM, Dean Landolt wrote: > > > This doesn't seem right. Assuming your WebSQL implementation had all the > same indexes isn't it doing pretty much the same things as using separate > objectStores in IDB? Why would it be an order of