On 8/16/12 1:29 PM, ext Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
That's a great point. It's already tracking all of the Web Components
work (it looks like I am by far the spammiest -- not the best of
honors, but I'll take it). Perhaps we could just encourage people to
listen to that?
:DG
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at
On 8/10/12 12:34 AM, ext Takeshi Yoshino wrote:
No technical comments.
A few editorial comments.
CLOSING (numeric value 2)
The connection is going through the closing handshake.
The readyState can enter CLOSING also when close() is called before
establishment. In that case, it's not going
The access request policy says to address security concerns.
This raises a few questions.
One is what are the security concerns.
That widgets will be able to access resources from anywhere over HTTP
because they are not bound to the HTML same origin policy (because
HTML does really define what
On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 13:36, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On 9 Aug 2012, at 13:10, Chaals McCathieNevile w...@chaals.com
(mailto:w...@chaals.com) wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:52:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
(mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com) wrote:
Chaals,
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:46:00 +0200, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 13:36, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On 9 Aug 2012, at 13:10, Chaals McCathieNevile w...@chaals.com On
Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:52:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10896
Travis Leithead [MSFT] tra...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10896
Travis Leithead [MSFT] tra...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18221
Eliot Graff eliot...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com, 2012-08-20 08:11 -0400:
On 8/16/12 1:29 PM, ext Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
That's a great point. It's already tracking all of the Web Components
work (it looks like I am by far the spammiest -- not the best of
honors, but I'll take it). Perhaps we could just
Greetings all,
We've been implementing undo manager in WebKit, and we've found out that
allowing live undo manager on a detached undo scope host is a terrible idea.
e.g. say you have a subtree like follows:
- A
- B
- D
- C
where A is the undo scope host. If we then
10 matches
Mail list logo