[admin] using Bugzilla's component tracking feature? [Was: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla

2012-08-20 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 8/16/12 1:29 PM, ext Dimitri Glazkov wrote: That's a great point. It's already tracking all of the Web Components work (it looks like I am by far the spammiest -- not the best of honors, but I'll take it). Perhaps we could just encourage people to listen to that? :DG On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at

Re: RfC: LCWD of WebSocket API; deadline August 30

2012-08-20 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 8/10/12 12:34 AM, ext Takeshi Yoshino wrote: No technical comments. A few editorial comments. CLOSING (numeric value 2) The connection is going through the closing handshake. The readyState can enter CLOSING also when close() is called before establishment. In that case, it's not going

Re: Widget access request policy

2012-08-20 Thread Marcos Caceres
The access request policy says to address security concerns. This raises a few questions. One is what are the security concerns. That widgets will be able to access resources from anywhere over HTTP because they are not bound to the HTML same origin policy (because HTML does really define what

[widgets] PC ready for pub - Re: CfC: publish Widgets PC as a Proposed Edited Recommendation; deadline August 8

2012-08-20 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 13:36, Marcos Caceres wrote: On 9 Aug 2012, at 13:10, Chaals McCathieNevile w...@chaals.com (mailto:w...@chaals.com) wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:52:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com (mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com) wrote: Chaals,

Re: [widgets] PC ready for pub - Re: CfC: publish Widgets PC as a Proposed Edited Recommendation; deadline August 8

2012-08-20 Thread Chaals McCathieNevile
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:46:00 +0200, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote: On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 13:36, Marcos Caceres wrote: On 9 Aug 2012, at 13:10, Chaals McCathieNevile w...@chaals.com On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:52:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com

[Bug 10896] enable device independent access to event handlers

2012-08-20 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10896 Travis Leithead [MSFT] tra...@microsoft.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug 10896] enable device independent access to event handlers

2012-08-20 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10896 Travis Leithead [MSFT] tra...@microsoft.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX

[Bug 18221] the word 'using' is repeated in the last line following 'Shared Blacklists' (This information can then be shared with other sites, using using visitors' IP)

2012-08-20 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18221 Eliot Graff eliot...@microsoft.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Re: [admin] using Bugzilla's component tracking feature? [Was: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla

2012-08-20 Thread Michael[tm] Smith
Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com, 2012-08-20 08:11 -0400: On 8/16/12 1:29 PM, ext Dimitri Glazkov wrote: That's a great point. It's already tracking all of the Web Components work (it looks like I am by far the spammiest -- not the best of honors, but I'll take it). Perhaps we could just

[UndoManager] Disallowing live UndoManager on detached nodes

2012-08-20 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
Greetings all, We've been implementing undo manager in WebKit, and we've found out that allowing live undo manager on a detached undo scope host is a terrible idea. e.g. say you have a subtree like follows: - A - B - D - C where A is the undo scope host. If we then