Re: Shadow DOM spec for v1 is ready to be reviewed

Thank you for the feedback! Let me take a look at the filed issues. I really appreciate it. It looks https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/308 is the only conceptual problem. I think I can send "Intent to Implement: Shadow DOM v1" in Blink soon. :) On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:43 AM Ryosuke

Re: Shadow DOM spec for v1 is ready to be reviewed

Thanks for the update! > On Aug 27, 2015, at 11:33 PM, Hayato Ito wrote: > > Let me post a quick update for the Shadow DOM spec: > https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/ >

Re: PSA: publish WD of "WebIDL Level 1"

> On 31 Aug 2015, at 20:12, Ms2ger wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Yves, > > On 08/31/2015 03:28 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: >> In fact, I would prefer to have the editors’ copy published as >> TR/WebIDL/, and let -1 -2 … -n be pointers to the

Re: PSA: publish WD of "WebIDL Level 1"

> On 01 Sep 2015, at 14:27, Ms2ger wrote: > > Hi Yves, > > On 09/01/2015 11:30 AM, Yves Lafon wrote: >> On 31 Aug 2015, at 20:12, Ms2ger wrote: >>> On 08/31/2015 03:28 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: In fact, I would prefer to have the editors’ copy published as

Re: PSA: publish WD of "WebIDL Level 1"

Hi Yves, On 09/01/2015 11:30 AM, Yves Lafon wrote: > On 31 Aug 2015, at 20:12, Ms2ger wrote: >> On 08/31/2015 03:28 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: >>> In fact, I would prefer to have the editors’ copy published as >>> TR/WebIDL/, and let -1 -2 … -n be pointers to the stable version >>>

Re: PSA: publish WD of "WebIDL Level 1"

> On Sep 1, 2015, at 7:27 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: >> I think you’re missing the point. The point of these documentation is to >> know exactly what the patch author was looking at the time he wrote

Re: PSA: publish WD of "WebIDL Level 1"

> On Aug 31, 2015, at 8:51 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: >> Let's say we implement some feature based on Web IDL published as of today. >> I'm going to refer that in my source code commit message.

Re: PSA: publish WD of "WebIDL Level 1"

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > I think you’re missing the point. The point of these documentation is to > know exactly what the patch author was looking at the time he wrote the > patch. If there was a typo in the spec, that’s an important information.