Art wrote:
The proposal to merge the WebApps WG and the HTML WG has started a formal
review period that ends September 10:
http://w3c.github.io/charter-html/group-charter.html
IRC: active participants, particularly editors, regularly use the #webapps
W3C IRC channel
is this channel
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-webstorage-20150609/
Particpate: [sic]
the event must have its key attribute initialised to the name of the key in
question,
`initialized` [About 11,800,000 results] should be spelled as such for
w3c specs (w3c is en-us) instead of
`initialised` [About 553,000
http://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/publish/service_worker/WD-service-workers-20150625/
Invoke Run Service Worker algorithm with serviceWorker as the arguement
[sic].
Fetch invokes Handle Fetch with request. As a result of performing Handle
Fetch, the Service Woker [sic] returns
1. w3c is en-us
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerlock/raw-file/ea789b4e5b82/index.html#abstract
modelling - modeling
2. Xlib
It's Passover [1]. Passover begins in the evening of Friday, April 6,
2012, and ends in the evening of Saturday, April 14, 2012.
As it happens, your calendar hits the *end* of Passover which is just
as major of a holiday as the beginning (the middle is somewhat minor).
At the risk of being seen
Since webapps is currently rechartering, is this something it wants to consider?
Note that I'm not a member of webapps at this time.
There have been some requests for zip support [1], and probably less
relevant for xhr [2]. Note that the use case I'm forwarding [3]
requires support for both
Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
We should make this configurable via execCommand:
document.execCommand(TabBehavior, false, bitmask);
The bitmask is because you might want a different set of behaviors:
-Tabbing in lists
-Tabbing in table cells
-Tabbing blockquotes
-Tab in none of the
I think crypto is supposed to be in scope of another WG that was being
chartered nowish
On 11/30/11, Joran Greef jo...@ronomon.com wrote:
It would be great to have a native binding to Zlib and Snappy exposed to
Javascript in the browser. Zlib covers the expensive disk use-cases, Snappy
covers
I'd like to request that people stop sending posts about web intents to
public-webapps@w3.org and public-device-a...@w3.org
The new list exists and should be used:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-intents/2011Nov/
On 11/18/11, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
On 11/18/11
As sa note, that document is in violation of
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Translation/
The working language of the W3C is US English. The official version of a W3C
document is the US English language version at the W3C site.
So I fully expect it to change.
On 11/14/11, Giuseppe Pascale
Some of this really should wait until there's a list.
I believe that generally one wants to adjust audio as close to the
source as possible, in which case the TV doesn't know anything.
Some parallels:
A. If you have a cable box = vcr = tv in old serial fashion and use
old fashion remotes,
is that the web page actually does change the
volume on the viewing device. That's the beauty of these home networking
protocols.
-Clarke
On 11/10/11 2:53 PM, timeless timel...@gmail.com wrote:
Some of this really should wait until there's a list.
I believe that generally one wants to adjust audio
There are a couple of instances where the scribe.pl script broke and
s///'s appear. Also because of that, there are a number of times when
'scribe:' appears as a speaker, with the former resolved, most of
these should disappear.
Lastly, due to autocompletion, there's a third scribe listed
We've seen people who abused hidden style to smuggle evil shell
commands into seemingly innocuous shell instructions.
When pasting text into a word processor, one generally gets a
functional preview of the results. When pasting into a shell, things
are typically executed immediately sans preview.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Although there are ongoing discussions regarding exceptions, there were no
objections to this CfC. As such, I will request publication of a LC
specification to encourage broader review and comments.
Sorry, I'm in the
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:21 PM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
1. Graphical breakpoints. The user marks some DOM element or attribute to
trigger break. The debugger inserts mutation listeners to watch for the
event that causes that element/attribute to be created/modified.
to the user how to press it; it isn't
usefully labeled.
On 6/23/11, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
timeless,
I agree, it'd be nice to know. I'd really like to see this put toward
the AG (Accessibility Guidelines)
people, as they're the ones who follow this kind of things.
It's absolutely
And what if the device in question is just a touchscreen with no
keyboard, mouse or hardware buttons?
On 6/20/11, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
wrote:
On 06/21/2011 12:25 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
The use-case
Cheers!
On 6/23/11, Mark Pilgrim pilg...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12965
Summary: Problem: I want to perform DNS queries from a HTML5
app, but the networking functions available are too
restrictive to build a stub resolver. Why: DNS is not
just for
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
Is this what you were thinking?
yes
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
For example, say that we in version 2 of indexedDB add support for
foreign keys. So that you can say:
createObjectStore(car, { keyPath: id, foreignKeys: [{keyPath:
brand, objectStore: car-brands}]);
It seems bad that if a
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Hallvord R. M. Steen
hallv...@opera.com wrote:
to/from native clipboard types? Just off the top of your head? The typical
Web MIME types would of course be something along the lines of
text/plain
text/html
image/jpg
image/gif
image/png
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
There are a few things going on here:
yes
1) Does the filesystem preserve case? If it's case-sensitive, then
yes. If it's case-insensitive, then maybe.
2) Is it case-sensitive? If not, you have to decide how to do case
2011/5/12 Scott Wilson scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com:
I'd be tempted to just strip off any trailing slashes on import.
Actually I might do that for all path components in a WARP origin rather than
throw an error.
So. I was hoping it could be fixed by Stores when they import, but of
course
2011/5/11 Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com:
Here's an alternative suggestion that addresses the issues I had
above, while (I think) still addressing all your use-cases. Create a
new interface:
interface SpellcheckRange {
readonly unsigned long start;
readonly unsigned long length;
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
Timeless replied:
no, if the api is case insensitive, then it's case insensitive
*everywhere*, both on Turkish and on English systems. Things could
only be case sensitive when serialized to a real file system outside
of the API
I'm not really excited by the return of the attack on context menus.
Allowing web sites to hold user's browsers hostage is a bad starting
point. It might be ok if the user had to first opt into rich editing -
maybe.
Note that we only recently added protection for users against 'what
you see is
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
If *this API's* concept of filenames is case-insensitive, then IMAGE.JPG
and image.jpg represent the same file on English systems and two different
files on Turkish systems, which is an interop problem.
no, if the api is case
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
The one take-away I have from that bug: it would have been nice to have a
more descriptive error message.
It took awhile to figure out that the path length was too long for the
implementation.
if the exception included
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
This can be solved at the application layer in applications that want
it, without baking it into the filesystem API.
I wasn't talking about baking it into the api, i meant that the
application using it could write such code.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:43 AM, timeless timel...@gmail.com wrote:
My argument is that we should favor: 'case preserving' + 'case
folding' + 'case insensitivity'.
The virtual file system is going to be something which
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
I'm not worried about crashes or security issues, but I am worried
about performance. Not only is it the overhead of crossing from C++
into JS, but also the fact that the C++ code has to go through extra
pains to ensure that
suggest
the user use a more distinct name. As we're proposing file names that
are longer than most users are likely to use by default, we can
include datestamps (timeless unless collisions happen) to disambiguate
user generated collisions via a browser side import -- if such a
feature is provided at all).
It's pretty much impossible for me to figure out which things are new
or which i've missed in previous rounds. (It's also possible that I
didn't review this spec, in which case, I'm sorry.) I don't believe
these comments significantly affect the document, i.e. they're mostly
editorial, although
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Widget People - if you have any objections/concerns re Marcos' proposal
below, please respond by May 3 at the latest. (For some additional context,
the start of the thread is [1]).
Marcos - if no major
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Eliot Graff eliot.gr...@microsoft.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. Moving forward, I will track changes and resolution
of these suggestions in bug 9379 [1].
ok
Appreciate the time you've spent on this.
here's next next part, note that i drafted it a while
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
I expect this message to only have editorial comments. However, I'm
not fond of April 16th, this month is tax month and I still need to
file.
Transaction
A
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Louis-rémi's thread [1] on AppCache led to discussions about other storage
related APIs including DataCache, Google Gears, IDB and the File * APIs.
Of note, Google Gears is basically gone (as of Google Chrome 12 and
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/clipops/clipops.html
If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send them
to public-webapps by April 5 at the latest.
Sorry, i've been doing other stuff
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
Disagree. In explanatory text the more correct term is clearer. math is
only american in usage, and avoiding the feeling that it is a typo would
reduce congitive dissonance without being incorrect.
ok
not
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:32:57 +0100, timeless timel...@gmail.com wrote:
a nokia maps application uses json for localization and could be
easily ported to the widget format.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
Could you automatically port
note that you don't *need* to duplicate html files.
the format allows for one to have json based localizations.
a nokia maps application uses json for localization and could be
easily ported to the widget format.
i can't do it publicly because i don't own/manage the code.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Scott Wilson
scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com wrote:
things like widgets.preferences.12345=xyz throw exceptions.
widgets.preferences[12345]=xyz probably works...
note that i should have said:
widgets.preferences[12345]=xyz probably works...
since other reserved words don't work well unquoted... and obviously
if your identifier includes , ', or \, you may need to quote it or
escape it appropriately...
This specification standardizes a packaging format and metadata for a class
of software known as widgets. Unlike traditional user interface widgets (e.g.,
buttons, input boxes, toolbars, etc.), widgets as specified in this document
are full-fledged client-side applications that are authored
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Scott Wilson
scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just had a look at this:
https://apps.mozillalabs.com/
In some respects this is very much what we are aiming for (apps using
HTML+JS+CSS) however it proposes a new proprietary app manifest format for
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Web Applications Working Group Issue
Tracker sysbot+trac...@w3.org wrote:
'mousewheel' was later dropped based on feedback from implementers (Mozilla,
Microsoft), who expressed a reluctance to implement 'mousewheel', and a lack
of useful interoperability and
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
it might be cool (and not too complicated) to (optionally) expose 1xx
responses to the caller (see
http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html#status.1xx).
There's one application I know of (not browser based) which
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Regrets
Minor note, I had told people in August that I would be on vacation
for September, thus I should have been listed in Regrets for this
meeting (and the previous one).
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Devdatta Akhawe dev.akh...@gmail.com
wrote:
1) There are now two methods for getting at the URL parameters. The
and none for setting them?
That's correct. Looking at various libraries,
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com wrote:
Alway use a http uri. Should we make an Authoring note in PC about this?
https should be ok too :)
Thanks to Art, I'll be there. Most likely I'll be available as a scribe.
I'm still digging through my backlog (one month's vacation takes time
to recover). I should be done w/ my webapps backlog sometime tonight
minus comments on actual documents (and that leaves one more mailing
list w/ 400
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Web Applications Working Group Issue
Tracker sysbot+trac...@w3.org wrote:
ISSUE-137 (IME-keypress): Should keypress events fire when using an IME?
[DOM3 Events]
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/137
Raised by: Doug Schepers
On product: DOM3 Events
complete ti as timeless,
from my perspective this is really an IME effect, it's equivalent to
me pasteing timeless or meless over/after ti (however you want
to think about it), it isn't equivalent to me typing t i m e
l e s s, as I didn't do that. One reason to consider this is
when you look at how PuTTY
Whomever adds delete/continue back to the spec needs to inline into
the spec an explanation of why it's ok per ES5.
Most (all) of us grew up pre ES5 and *believe* that they're truly
reserved keywords and that what you're doing is invalid.
So without inlining the explanation into the spec, you're
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.com wrote:
Another advantage is that...
blobdata://http_responsible_party.org:80/3699b4a0-e43e-4cec-b87b-82b6f83dd752
... makes it clear to the end user who the responsible party is when these
urls are visible in the user
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Mike Belshe mbel...@google.com wrote:
Changes:
* changed the setPriority() method to be an attribute priority
Applications may alter the priority by calling the setPriority() method on
the XMLHttpRequest object.
The priority set on the object at the time
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Giles Hogben
giles.hog...@enisa.europa.eu wrote:
I am a security expert at ENISA (the European Network and Information
Security Agency).
We conducting a study on smartphone security and would like to have input
from the Web
Apps WG via the attached
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Max Froumentin max...@opera.com wrote:
- isBattery: true if the current power source is a battery
- isBeingCharged: true if the current power source is a battery and is
and drop current from the descriptions.
Why? The power source can be changed over time.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Max Froumentin max...@opera.com wrote:
Ah, I see. It was the most logical place to put it. After both high and
low were defined, but not separate. I don't know if it's wise repeating
the same text in both places, either.
I'm just flagging. I'm hoping someone
Please note, that like Jonas, I'm not endorsing any of this.
http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/
the system which they are running on.
... on which they are running.
Specifically, properties pertaining to the device hardware are addressed.
exposed?
Therefore, a conforming
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Max Froumentin max...@opera.com wrote:
On 10/05/2010 11:12, timeless wrote:
Please note, that like Jonas, I'm not endorsing any of this.
What do you mean by that?
Oh, it's sort of a standard disclaimer that people involved with
Mozilla or as members of other
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com wrote:
With the WG's permission, I would like to move the widget specs to the
DVCS platform.
sounds good
Maybe we can put it on the agenda for discussion tomorrow.
2010/4/30 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) ife...@google.com:
I remain perplexed by the state of the spec is feature complete and looking
for implementations - potential implementors saying the spec has X,Y,Z
flaws - sorry, the spec is feature complete. We're looking for
implementations. At this rate,
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gregg Tavares g...@google.com wrote:
I'm sorry if I'm not familiar with all the details of how the widgets spec
is going but the specs encourage comment so I'm commenting :-)
It seems like widgets have 2 uses
#1) As a way to package an HTML5 app that can be
cool.
thankfully the way the standards stuff works, it's too late to change
any of this.
e.g. the standards group has already selected a signing mechanism to
which mozilla objects, but it can't be changed. similarly, zip can't
be replaced in widgets.
people are free to write replacement
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote:
I just produced an update of VMMF to make it ready for publication:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/.
Essentially I changed it so that it corresponds to CSS Media Queries. That,
plus it being a UI oriented
://viper.haque.net/~timeless/blog/2/popups/ is the write-up, it's
actually the oldest thing in my blog :).
Note that my opinion has nothing specifically to do with widgets, I
don't approve of random applications on my computer launching my web
browser and ordering it to go somewhere. I'd rather my web
2010/1/29 Pierre-Antoine LaFayette pierre.lafaye...@gmail.com:
Perhaps if we found some creative commons icons to use as defaults for the
most used extensions. It wouldn't match the native theme but at least we'd
have something for cases where platform icons are not available. We'd need
to
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote:
The term drive-by comment is one made against a specification in passing
without the diligence and conscientiousness to participate in the follow-up
discussion; and typically to then re-iterate it later. I believe that the
Regrets, i'm on vacation for a month starting tomorrow
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:49 PM, jere.kapy...@nokia.com wrote:
/4/ Finally, the IRI vs URI naming debate applies as ever. I agree it's
messy in that we are so accustomed to URIs, but really should be using IRIs,
and that not everyone is conditioned to mentally replace URI with IRI every
time.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Innovimax SARLinnovi...@gmail.com wrote:
I wanted to propose that the mediatype should be
application/widget+zip
In this case it is clear that it is a zip package (just in case
another widget package come along with another packaging format :
gzip, opc,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Mark Bakerdist...@acm.org wrote:
I don't understand. In what scenario would a script be comparing URIs
produced by different implementations?
implementations tend to be stupid and parse things by hand.
if you don't believe this, all you have to do is look at
I'd rather we formally indicate that using file urls in
XMLHttpRequests is not expected to work with an explanation that there
are security concerns which prevent XMLHttpRequest safely exposing
arbitrary file urls.
People who need access to local files should use a locally bound web
server or if
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
- drag and drop allows a precise visual target identification thus may be
considered safer (and this is actually implemented so: you can faster
drag-and-drop URLs than copy and paste them).
this isn't true.
depending on how friendly your drop target is, it theoretically
Jacob Rossi wrote:
Are you mostly referring to non-touch mobile users?
I'll answer this first, by saying that it was a general reference.
Although, it is true that today I work in the mobile industry. But i
also worry about other scenarios. Perhaps for some people it's hard to
use a mouse (there
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Sebastian
Markbågesebast...@calyptus.eu wrote:
I agree with Jacob. I find this part of the spec... puzzling.
so, one advantage of not distinguishing is that it enables people w/o
mice to trigger drag events.
if you don't do this, you effectively block such users
Marcos Caceres wrote:
a class of software application
Was plural intended?
Plural?
as in: software applications
DoC: ok
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Marcos Caceresmarc...@opera.com wrote:
For the sake of the DoC, can you live with the current i18n model?
No.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Marcos Caceresmarc...@opera.com wrote:
Fixed issues below. If satisfied with the corrections, please give us
an OK for the DoC :)
DoC: OK
I guess the person at Times Square that made the decision to activate
the widget.
Oh well. Someday that user will be
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Marcos Caceresmarc...@opera.com wrote:
Fixed all editorial comments below for this third set of comments. If
satisfied with the corrections, please give us
an OK for the DoC :)
DoC: OK
This would be the author's fault for including an empty file. The UA
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Marcos Caceresmarc...@opera.com wrote:
Addressed your final set of editorial issues. If satisfied with the
corrections, please give us
an OK for the DoC :)
DoC: OK except for the one below.
4:37 PM A user agent will acquire a potential Zip archive from a data
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Marcos Caceresmarc...@opera.com wrote:
I talked to our localization guys about this, they said that is
definitely not a good thing. They said any content is better than no
content, even if there is a mismatch.
I've spoken w/ coworkers recently, and other people
I wrote:
hey, you won't like this, but... I think we botched the
l10n stuff :). The problem is that the design is based on individual
resources, which is wrong. Negotiation should really be done at the
Package level. This is one of those things where thinking HTTPish
screws you over. A user
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:22 AM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
The picasa-style example mentioned earlier uses the word upload.
I've not used Picasa, but it appears to read files off a local
network.
confused. i suspect i was the one who mentioned it.
Picasa is mostly a local
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Robin Berjonro...@berjon.com wrote:
Precisely: defining behaviour would turn us into a UI specification — which
we dearly want to avoid.
yep.
Constant prompting makes for a dreadful UX, that's for sure,
yep.
but fixing that should be up to UA vendors.
or
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/
Date: Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:52 AM
2:29 AM me: hey
suppose that times square becomes widget capable
2:30 AM and starts running widgets, like a Clock.wdgt
who's the end user? :){
9 minutes
2:40 AM me: Bluetooth is spelled as
Date: Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:42 AM
8:42 AM me: A conformance checker (CC) is a user agent that verifies
if a widget package and a configuration document conform to this
specification.
if = whether
56 minutes
9:38 AM me: liwhen the a class=no-toc no-num
Date: Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:52 PM
4:15 PM me: (e.g., floating and application mode)
either floating mode and application mode
or the floating and application modes
The following example shows the usage of the name element.
widget xmlns=http://www.w3.org/ns/widgets;
name short=Weather
The
btw, don't forget the little people when you make the credits :)
have a good vacation, sorry about the delays.
all done :)
Date: Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:48 PM
6:36 PM me: (e.g., a user agent could use an array, or an object, or a
hash map, etc.).
drop each or
6:41 PM For each element in the elements list, if the element is one
of the following:
A preference element:
doesn't mention readonly (this might be ok, or maybe
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Arun Ranganathana...@mozilla.com wrote:
Hixie, I think a Base64 representation of the file resource may be
sufficient, particularly for the image use case (which is how it is used
already). Can you flesh out why the new schema is a good idea?
so. I have
Hi, apologies for the late comments.
I hope all of my comments are of an editorial nature. The only one
that might not be is the last one which is a question.
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/
-
I'm aware this is non normative:
1.4 Example
CanonicalizationMethod
Why is Id written in mixed case?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Thomas Roessler t...@w3.org wrote:
That's a choice that was made in the original version of the XML Signature
spec 7 years ago.
gah. thanks, and i think i've actually asked about this before. oops.
ok, retracted. sorry :)
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Thomas Roessler t...@w3.org wrote:
2. Where does the requirement for query strings suddenly come from? I can't
find it in the current editor's draft, and (beyond a side discussion with
timeless) don't recall conversation about it.
Basically web apps expect
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Thomas Roessler t...@w3.org wrote:
Just to be clear... The expectation you're talking about is that:
1. upon dereferencing, the query part is ignored
I'm not specifically making this request, I believe in our unminuted
discussion we talked about the potential
regrets, i'm traveling (again, i seem to do this often these days)
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
