Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

; the user what is the sense of a given flavour or even protocol handler >> which, as we know, is kind of error-prone. Agree?” Asking the user >> what sense of a given protocol? Are you saying we can’t ask users what >> apps they want to have handle various actions? If so,

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

col? Are you saying we can’t ask users what apps they want to have > handle various actions? If so, we do this all the time, in every OS on the > planet, and I wouldn’t say that simple process is error prone. Maybe I am > misunderstanding you? > > > > - Daniel > > > > From

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

uc...@microsoft.com><mailto:dabuc...@microsoft.com> Cc: public-webapps@w3.org<mailto:public-webapps@w3.org> Subject: Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling Daniel, as far as I can read the post, copy-and-paste-interoperability would be a "

RE: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

l From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:p...@hoplahup.net] Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 9:38 AM To: Daniel Buchner <dabuc...@microsoft.com> Cc: public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling Daniel, as far as I can read the post, copy-and-paste-interoperabili

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

On 2015-10-18 19:09, Aymeric Vitte wrote: Le 17/10/2015 16:19, Anders Rundgren a écrit : Unless you work for a browser vendor or is generally "recognized" for some specialty, nothing seems to be of enough interest to even get briefly evaluated. Right, that's a deficiency of the

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

Please stop on your side giving lessons again and stop trying to isolate/elude my initial answer, and refrain people on this list not to be insulting first. This one was not insulting, just a general consideration and you should consider it. But indeed, back to the "in-scope" technical

Re: Making progress with items in Web Platform Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

Offlist. On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:36:54 +0200, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-10-17 17:58, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote: Regarding App-to-App interaction I'm personally mainly into the Web-to-Native variant. As I already pointed out to Daniel, this stuff is

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

Daniel, as far as I can read the post, copy-and-paste-interoperability would be a "sub-task" of this. It's not a very small task though. In my world, E.g., there was a person who inventend a "math" protocol handler. For him it meant that formulæ be read out loud (because his mission is making the

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

Le 17/10/2015 16:19, Anders Rundgren a écrit : > Unless you work for a browser vendor or is generally "recognized" for some > specialty, nothing seems to be of enough interest to even get briefly > evaluated. > Right, that's a deficiency of the W3C/WHATWG/whatever specs process, where people

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

Anders Rundgren wrote: > Unless you work for a browser vendor or is generally "recognized" for > some > specialty, nothing seems to be of enough interest to even get briefly > evaluated. Maybe the right thing is assemble "user representative" groups and be enough heard on such places as this

Re: Making progress with items in Web Platform Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

Le 17/10/2015 17:58, Chaals McCathie Nevile a écrit : > Aymeric, that could apply to you to - and in fact the requirement to > behave courteously is a general one for this list and others of the Web > Platform WG Replying only to this for now, you don't know what you are talking about and don't

Re: Making progress with items in Web Platform Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

On 2015-10-17 17:58, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote: Regarding App-to-App interaction I'm personally mainly into the Web-to-Native variant. As I already pointed out to Daniel, this stuff is not in the current scope of the group, and you should work on it in the context of e.g. the Web Incubator

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

On 2015-10-16 18:00, Aymeric Vitte wrote: Well, since I was on the list, I took the liberty of commenting a bit on this. Unless you work for a browser vendor or is generally "recognized" for some specialty, nothing seems to be of enough interest to even get briefly evaluated. Regarding

Making progress with items in Web Platform Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:19:17 +0200, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-10-16 18:00, Aymeric Vitte wrote: Well, since I was on the list, I took the liberty of commenting a bit on this. Please work on being more civil and constructive when you do. (Aymeric,

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

: Samsung account [mailto:bnw6...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 9:26 AM To: Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Buchner <dabuc...@microsoft.com>; public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling 2015/1

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

Ccing the authors of [1], [2] and [3] if there is still an interest. > > at this stage we don't have a deliverable for this work - i.e. the W3C > members haven't approved doing something like this in Web Platform working > group. Given that people repeatedly attempt to do it, I think the >

Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

On 10/14/15 12:33 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote: Hey WebAppers, Just ran into this dragon for the 1,326^th time, so thought I would do a write-up to rekindle discussion on this important area of developer need the platform currently fails to address:

RE: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling

<art.bars...@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Buchner <dabuc...@microsoft.com>; public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: App-to-App interaction APIs - one more time, with feeling 2015/10/15 下午11:58於 "Arthur Barstow" <art.bars...@gmail.com<mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com>>寫道： > &