On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:24:47 +0100, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
wrote:
On 12/17/2011 04:30 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:08:55 +0100, Arthur Barstow
art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
All - What are the opinions on what, if anything, to do with XBL2
vis-a-vis the
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:08:55 +0100, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
All - What are the opinions on what, if anything, to do with XBL2
vis-a-vis the charter update? Leave it on the REC track, stop work and
publish it as a WG Note, something else?
I would leave it as, but add a
On 12/17/2011 04:30 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:08:55 +0100, Arthur Barstow
art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
All - What are the opinions on what, if anything, to do with XBL2
vis-a-vis the charter update? Leave it on the REC track, stop work and
publish it as a WG Note,
Hi Arthur,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote:
Hi IanF, All,
Following up on Quota API vis-à-visCharterChanges wiki [1] ...
Does the group want to add Quota API to the group's charter? If yes, where
is a draft/strawman proposal?
We have an early
to be agreement with the proposal.
-AB
[CharterChanges] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/CharterChanges
Original Message
Subject: Re: Quota API and WebApps [Was: Re: Consolidating charter
changes]
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:22:38 +0900
From: ext Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org
On 11/23/11 1:10 PM, ext Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
Let's iterate and get it to the digestible
point :)
Thanks for the list. Given we consider Web Components already in scope,
I added it to the Additions Agreed section as a reminder it should be an
explicit deliverable [1].
I expect that Web
Hi IanF, All,
Following up on Quota API vis-à-visCharterChanges wiki [1] ...
Does the group want to add Quota API to the group's charter? If yes,
where is a draft/strawman proposal?
-AB
[1] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/CharterChanges
On 11/8/11 12:37 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi IanF, All,
Following up on IME and WebApps vis-à-vis CharterChanges wiki [1] ...
IanF - during our f2f meeting [2], you agreed to supply some additional
information e.g. use cases as requested by at least Maciej. When can we
expect that info?
-AB
[1]
Hi All,
In the context of WebApps' rechartering, what are our plans and
expectations for XBL2 and Component modeling? For example, what do we
want to stop (e.g. move to WG Note); are there any new deliverable(s) we
want to add?
(I just noticed we are coming up on five years since the XBL2
Hi Arthur!
I am a procedural n00b and apologize in advance if this is not exactly
what you're looking for. Let's iterate and get it to the digestible
point :)
In the next few months, I'll be working on and refining (with the help
of folks who are interested in the subject):
1) a detailed spec
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:37:55 -0800, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
During the October 31 meeting, we discussed [1] various additions,
changes and deletions for WebApps' current charter [2]. To consolidate
the various proposals, I created the following doc:
On 11/11/11 12:41 PM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:37:55 -0800, Arthur Barstow
art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
During the October 31 meeting, we discussed [1] various additions,
changes and deletions for WebApps' current charter [2]. To
consolidate the various proposals, I
Hi,
On Nov 9, 2011, at 00:25 , James Hawkins wrote:
Under 'Additions Agreed':
* Web Intents - this will be a joint deliverable with DAPI WG
Pedantically, not politically: My recollection is that the agreement was only
to add Web Intents to the Webapps charter (neither accepting nor denying
On 11/10/11 4:36 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
Hi,
On Nov 9, 2011, at 00:25 , James Hawkins wrote:
Under 'Additions Agreed':
* Web Intents - this will be a joint deliverable with DAPI WG
Pedantically, not politically: My recollection is that the agreement was only
to add Web Intents to the
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:36:24 +0100, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
On 11/10/11 4:36 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
Hi,
On Nov 9, 2011, at 00:25 , James Hawkins wrote:
Under 'Additions Agreed':
* Web Intents - this will be a joint deliverable with DAPI WG
Pedantically, not
+1 , separate mail list, task force, joint deliverable, participation of
members of both WGs. Is there any problem remaining?
but use DAP instead of DAPI in your communications, Art :)
thanks
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
On Nov 10, 2011, at 8:36 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
During the October 31 meeting, we discussed [1] various additions,
changes and deletions for WebApps' current charter [2]. To consolidate
the various proposals, I created the following doc:
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/CharterChanges
My expectation is that Doug will this information
I propose using the mail list and then after we get consensus, the wiki
is updated accordingly.
On 11/8/11 1:04 PM, ext James Hawkins wrote:
To clarify, should we comment on this thread or in the wiki?
Thanks,
James
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
Under 'Additions Agreed':
* Web Intents - this will be a joint deliverable with DAPI WG
Pedantically, not politically: My recollection is that the agreement was
only to add Web Intents to the Webapps charter (neither accepting nor
denying a joint deliverable with DAPI). The status of the joint
19 matches
Mail list logo
