On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:52:33 +0200, Adrian Bateman
adria...@microsoft.com wrote:
It's harder to participate without understanding the scope of the
problems being solved.
Bringing that point up just before publication as a means to block said
publication is not helpful. There has been ample
On Monday, August 15, 2011 2:22 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:21:46 +0200, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:06:58 +0200, Adrian Bateman
adria...@microsoft.com wrote:
The name was changed. We weren't terribly keen on the change. It is
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:21:46 +0200, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:06:58 +0200, Adrian Bateman
adria...@microsoft.com wrote:
The name was changed. We weren't terribly keen on the change. It is now
causing problems. I've had multiple people contact me confused
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:17:30 +0200, David Flanagan dflana...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On 8/4/11 12:21 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Alright, how about DOM4?
I suspect it is the inclusion of the word core that causes the
confusion, not the lack of a version number. If you google dom core
you
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:06:58 +0200, Adrian Bateman
adria...@microsoft.com wrote:
The name was changed. We weren't terribly keen on the change. It is now
causing problems. I've had multiple people contact me confused about
this. We should fix the problem.
Alright, how about DOM4?
This
On 8/4/11 12:21 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:06:58 +0200, Adrian Bateman
adria...@microsoft.com wrote:
The name was changed. We weren't terribly keen on the change. It is now
causing problems. I've had multiple people contact me confused about
this. We should fix the
