On 3/24/15 3:07 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 3/24/15 10:21 AM, Richard Ishida wrote:
is it possible to send mail to www-internatio...@w3.org each time
someone adds somethign to the github issue? (this is the list where
we track and discuss issues).
if so, i see no real difference between
so far.
Kenneth
-Original Message-
From: Phillips, Addison [mailto:addi...@lab126.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:43 PM
To: Christiansen, Kenneth R; public-webapps@w3.org
Cc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org
Subject: RE: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications
Hi Kenneth,
Thanks
: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications
Hi Kenneth,
Thanks for the reply.
I know you're using GitHub. However, whenever I'm filing/forwarding
comments on a document on behalf of the Working Group, I always look at
the SOTD in the document in question to see what instructions
On 3/24/15 10:21 AM, Richard Ishida wrote:
is it possible to send mail to www-internatio...@w3.org each time
someone adds somethign to the github issue? (this is the list where we
track and discuss issues).
if so, i see no real difference between using github or bugzilla – our
process is
...@lab126.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 6:20 PM
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Cc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org
Subject: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications
Hello Webapps,
As previously mentioned, I am about to send you comments from the
Internationalization Working Group on your document
Message-
From: Christiansen, Kenneth R [mailto:kenneth.r.christian...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 1:15 AM
To: Phillips, Addison; public-webapps@w3.org
Cc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org
Subject: RE: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications
Hi there,
The spec authors use
, 2015 4:43 PM
To: Christiansen, Kenneth R; public-webapps@w3.org
Cc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org
Subject: RE: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications
Hi Kenneth,
Thanks for the reply.
I know you're using GitHub. However, whenever I'm filing/forwarding
comments on a document on behalf
Hello Webapps,
As previously mentioned, I am about to send you comments from the
Internationalization Working Group on your document (whose current iteration
lives at [1]). Because we use Tracker for our comments, I will be sending each
comment under separate cover. The I18N WG is always happy
[comments below]
On 2010/03/27 18:49, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Thanks Felix, I will update the schema. However, the BIDI spec warns,
for security reasons, to avoid the overrides so I didn't include them
into our spec. Should I put lro and rlo into the spec regardless? the
spec now contains a note
Hi,
On 27/03/10 9:07 AM, Felix Sasaki wrote:
The spec itself looks fine. It seems that the schema at
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-schema/widgets.rnc
is not up to date yet. It still contains the *ITS* dir attribute, e.g. at
elem.author = element author {
attr.xmllang?,
[mailto:marc...@opera.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:35 AM
To: Martin J. Dürst
Cc: Felix Sasaki; Arthur Barstow; Phillips, Addison; public-i18n-
c...@w3.org; public-webapps; Richard Ishida
Subject: Re: i18n comments:
Hi Martin,
On 29/03/10 10:01 AM, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
[comments below
Hi Addison,
On 29/03/10 5:16 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote:
This doesn't make any sense to me. I think you are over-thinking this.
The author element contains the author's *NAME*. It can also include an href
and an email attribute. UTR#36 refers explicitly to IRIs and IDNA addresses,
which
The spec itself looks fine. It seems that the schema at
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-schema/widgets.rnc
is not up to date yet. It still contains the *ITS* dir attribute, e.g. at
elem.author = element author {
attr.xmllang?,
attr.itsdir?,
attribute href { xsd:anyURI }?,
On Mar 27, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Felix Sasaki felix.sas...@fh-potsdam.de
wrote:
The spec itself looks fine. It seems that the schema at
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-schema/widgets.rnc
is not up to date yet. It still contains the *ITS* dir attribute,
e.g. at
elem.author = element
[Changing the subject to keep the review comment thread clean]
Personally, I think we're ok with the changes.
RI
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://rishida.net/
-Original Message-
From:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:30 PM, jere.kapy...@nokia.com wrote:
Marcos,
thanks for a lucid and thorough widget I18N model proposal. This should
really help all concerned to come to agreement about how widgets should be
internationalized and localized. Also in this case I18N turned out to be
Marcos,
thanks for a lucid and thorough widget I18N model proposal. This should really
help all concerned to come to agreement about how widgets should be
internationalized and localized. Also in this case I18N turned out to be more
than many perhaps thought it would, but the effort is worth
hey, both of your messages were marked by gmail as phishing (they
claim the sender isn't who it appeared to be). Is this normal? Is it
because of the mailing list?
This means that people like me might not have seen either message.
Hi i18n core,
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Marcos Caceres
marcosscace...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Phillips, Addison addi...@amazon.com
wrote:
2. Section 7.4 (Widget) The various language bearing elements such as
name, description, etc. are of the zero-or-one
...@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-core-
requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 2:34 AM
To: public-i18n-c...@w3.org
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: Widgets 1.0 Packaging and Configuration: I18N
comments...
Hi i18n core,
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:28 PM
.
-Original Message-
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:marc...@opera.com]
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 8:03 AM
To: Phillips, Addison
Cc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org; public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: Widgets 1.0 Packaging and Configuration: I18N
comments...
Hi Addison,
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009
Dear i18n WG,
Inline comments below and just two quick final questions...
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Phillips, Addison addi...@amazon.com wrote:
Dear Webapps WG,
The Internationalization Core WG has reviewed the following document:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-widgets-20081222/
Here
22 matches
Mail list logo
