On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, Darin Fisher wrote:
Based on the ValidityState example, it seems that the members of Flags
should be camelCase then instead of UPPERCASE?
The platform convention, insofar as there is a convention, is that
constants are uppercase, members are camelCase, and interfaces and
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10234
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:09:13 +0200, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other
spec, like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we change to
use the same name all across our specs? Since we define ArrayBuffer in
the Typed
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:12:36 +0200, Arun Ranganathan
aranganat...@mozilla.com wrote:
So I shall do as you did in the erstwhile Web SQL Database API. Perhaps
I can keep the codes that I'm reusing from DOMException as is, so that
they are consistent with DOMException (for greater developer
Hi i18n Core,
The Web Apps is seeking a review and comments on the i18n portion of the
Widgets Packaging and Configuration Test Suite.
The descriptions and pass conditions for the tests can be found at the
following URL:
[1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/test-suite/#user-agent
Please
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Nathan Kitchen w...@nathankitchen.comwrote:
Hi all.
Stumbled across this article on Ars Technica regarding the abuse of the
WebSQL spec. I thought I'd share it here for a couple of reasons:
1. Someone might want to point out that it's part of the Offline
Opera would like to announce the first release of the test suite for the
Digital Signatures for Widgets specification [1]. The test suite is here:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/test-suite/
The WebApps WG is seeking review of the test cases from members of
XMLSec and WebApps, the
Thanks, I posted a comment on the original article to shed some light on
this. Looks like the iOS implementation either doesn't follow the
recommendations or doesn't give the user the means (information or
functionality) to prevent user tracking.
Hopefully this will stop people complaining about
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com wrote:
Opera would like to announce the first release of the test suite for the
Digital Signatures for Widgets specification [1]. The test suite is here:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/test-suite/
The WebApps WG is
On 9/4/10 6:36 AM, ext Doug Schepers wrote:
To that end, could you provide a link to the requirements document, or
if there isn't one, could you start one?
FYI: when the Web Application Formats WG transitioned XBL2 from Last
Call WD to CR (March 2007), the transition request included the
1. Most people that I talk to dislike the name Blob, much less having
it spread to things like BlobReader.
I could maybe understand this if blob were a new term we were
inventing. But it's not. It's a well-known computer science concept.
It seems worse to try and coin a totally new name for
On Sep 8, 2010, at 12:13 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:09:13 +0200, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other spec,
like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we change to use the same
name all
(Removed the WHATWG list (cross-posting is such a pain and XMLHttpRequest
is mostly developed here) and renamed the subject.)
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:22:44 +0200, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
ArrayBuffer certainly has momentum behind it. It started as a part of
the WebGL spec as a
On 08.09.2010 17:35, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
...
Okay. I guess we can all add support for it and see who screams :-)
I can certainly add this to XMLHttpRequest Level 2 and have been wanting
to do that since forever. As you might have seen notes to that effect
are in the specification. send()
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:22:44 +0200, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 12:13 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:09:13 +0200, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other
spec, like
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Nathan Kitchen w...@nathankitchen.com wrote:
Hi all.
Stumbled across this article on Ars Technica regarding the abuse of the
WebSQL spec. I thought I'd share it here for a couple of reasons:
Someone might want to point out that it's part of the Offline Storage
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
On 08.09.2010 17:35, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
...
Okay. I guess we can all add support for it and see who screams :-)
I can certainly add this to XMLHttpRequest Level 2 and have been wanting
to do that since
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other spec,
like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we change to use the same
name all across our specs? Since we define ArrayBuffer in the Typed
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:12:36 +0200, Arun Ranganathan
aranganat...@mozilla.com wrote:
So I shall do as you did in the erstwhile Web SQL Database API. Perhaps I
can keep the codes that I'm reusing from DOMException as
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, Darin Fisher wrote:
Based on the ValidityState example, it seems that the members of Flags
should be camelCase then instead of UPPERCASE?
The platform convention, insofar as there is a convention, is that
On Sep 8, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:22:44 +0200, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 12:13 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:09:13 +0200, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
Several specs, like File API and
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:13:19 +0200, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
ArrayBuffer certainly has momentum behind it. It started as a part of
the WebGL spec as a way of passing buffers of data of various types
(sometimes heterogeneous types) to the WebGL engine. Since then, it
has found
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Web Sockets is certainly another candidate, but I meant Web Workers. There
have been informal discussions on using ArrayBuffers as a way to safely share
binary data between threads. I don't believe anything has been formalized
here.
You
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Web Sockets is certainly another candidate, but I meant Web Workers. There
have been informal discussions on using ArrayBuffers as a way to safely
share binary data between
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Web Sockets is certainly another candidate, but I meant Web Workers. There
have been informal discussions on using ArrayBuffers as a way to safely
share binary data between threads. I don't
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10585
Summary: Need an error to indicate that the user disallowed
access
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Web Sockets is certainly another candidate, but I meant Web Workers.
There have been informal discussions on using
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Web Sockets is certainly another
28 matches
Mail list logo
