On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:05:44 +0100, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Arun Ranganathan
aranganat...@mozilla.comwrote:
Simon,
Is the relevant part of HTML sufficient to refer to?
I think it might be time to have a CFC to propose moving Widget URI and Widget
Updates to WG Notes. Although both specs have gotten implemented, I'm not
interested in continuing the work unless I have industry backing.
Kind regards,
Marcos
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:05:37 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
If we can't U+FFFD unpaired surrogates on paste, I agree it makes sense
to
U+FFFD them in APIs. If the only way to get them is a JS escape, then an
exception seems OK.
People use JS strings to handle binary data. This
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
My
preference would be to deal with them by encoding them to U+FFFD for
the same reason that we let the HTML parser do error recovery rather
than XML-style draconian error handling.
I'm not really opposed to making APIs
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:50:22 +0100, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
That is certainly one point of view. However, we've been collecting
features for a v2 since before June of 2011 [1]. To that effect, we've
had several email exchanges between the WG members where we agree to
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
It is our belief based on internal feedback and external partner feedback
that the technology will remain un-deployed and in draft form if we continue
to make changes like this.
Yes it might take a little longer, but
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:56:05 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Just to be clear. We've all been here long enough to know that Last
Call is not what matters, what matters is when implementations ship
and when enough content is authored that making incompatible changes
will break too
I think we've been feature complete for a while now. With one
exception, which is that some error handling that we've discussed on
the list needs to be edited into the spec.
Apart from that we have a number of fairly minor uncontroversial fixes
(details around generators, order in
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:56:05 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Just to be clear. We've all been here long enough to know that Last
Call is not what matters, what matters is when implementations ship
and when
Hi,
While looking at the FileSystem API draft I noticed that we only expose
'modificationTime' in 'Metadata' object. Since FileEntry itself doesn't
have 'size' field unlike File object maybe it's reasonable to add 'size'
field to Metadata?
From: Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
I think we've been feature complete for a while now. With one
exception, which is that some error handling that we've discussed on
the list needs to be edited into the spec.
Apart from that we have a number of fairly minor uncontroversial fixes
Dear All,
At this time, the meeting will NOT happen on those dates since we didn't
find a host for the meetings.
I'm looking to see if we could do one in May/June (or July at most). As
soon as we manage to secure a host for it, I'll propose new dates.
Thank you to all who provided feedback,
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:33:15 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Last I think I heard it was in relation to renaming CORS headers which
also is in WD stage.
I have proposed renaming them if that is what you mean; people objected.
We could certainly try to make this change when
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Odin Hørthe Omdal odi...@opera.comwrote:
From: Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
I think we've been feature complete for a while now. With one
exception, which is that some error handling that we've discussed on
the list needs to be edited into the spec.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Joshua Bell jsb...@chromium.org wrote:
Are there implementations of the IDB*Sync APIs for Workers?
Gecko does not implement the IDBSync APIs, and I don't think that is likely
to change in the next few months.
- Kyle
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
While looking at the FileSystem API draft I noticed that we only expose
'modificationTime' in 'Metadata' object. Since FileEntry itself doesn't
have 'size' field unlike File object maybe it's reasonable to add
On Feb 28, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
While looking at the FileSystem API draft I noticed that we only expose
'modificationTime' in 'Metadata' object. Since FileEntry itself
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Ms2ger ms2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
There are a number of bugs in the WebIDL blocks in
http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/file-system/file-writer.html.
* The 'in' token has been removed; void append (in Blob data); should
be void append (Blob data);.
Fixed.
*
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
I think WebSocket should do the same, for the same reason.
Have you filed a bug?
(No, not until this conversation moves along a bit further.)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
I
I like the Event Invariants writeup at the end. It's only
informative, but it is, indeed, informative.
However, I'm not sure it quite matches the normative text in one
respect. Where you say [8.5.6 step 4]: Terminate any steps while
processing a read method. Does that also terminate the steps
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
I think WebSocket should do the same, for the same reason.
Have you filed a bug?
(No, not until this conversation moves along a bit further.)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
IE is not planning on implementing the IDBSync APIs for IE10 and we proposed to
mark them “At Risk” on the current spec.
Israel
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:17 AM, Kyle Huey wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Joshua Bell
jsb...@chromium.orgmailto:jsb...@chromium.org wrote:
Are there
://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20120228#l-39.
I was a little confused at the above explanation. I think what you mean is
that the lock is held so long as a FileRequest object is active (eg. has
yet to dispatch a success or error event). More concretely, at the end of
each microtask (if you
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16157
Summary: WebSocket shouldn't throw SyntaxError on unpaired
surrogates
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Arun Ranganathan
aranganat...@mozilla.comwrote:
or use another algorithm with an identical result, and be decoded as
UTF-8.
I think this can be removed. You can always replace algorithms with
equivalent ones, in any part of an implementation.
and be decoded as
25 matches
Mail list logo
