RE: Can we land heycam's WebIDL tests as-is and address review comments following?

Travis, Great. Glad to hear that you are working on the tests. Perhaps you can try Simon' method to make your update in a new branch in w3c/web-platform-tests, so that others can make updates together. Thanks, Zhiqiang From: Travis Leithead [mailto:travis.leith...@microsoft.com] Sent: Monday,

RE: Can we land heycam's WebIDL tests as-is and address review comments following?

Yves and I have been reviewing these tests and revising them according to recent WebIDL changes and we think they may be ready to be integrated. The updates are in a PR on heycams page. Let’s not integrate heycam’s original PR until our update is done first please… From: Simon Pieters

Re: Can we land heycam's WebIDL tests as-is and address review comments following?

On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 07:34:12 +0100, Zhang, Zhiqiang wrote: Hi, 2+ years ago, heycam submitted WebIDL tests at https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/271 These tests have been reviewed by several guys but get no update ever since. I wonder if we could land the tests as-is and ad

Re: [WebIDL] T[] migration

On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 18:04:27 +0100, Olli Pettay wrote: On 12/18/2015 06:20 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: From: Simon Pieters [mailto:sim...@opera.com] Note that it requires liveness. Does that work for a frozen array? Frozen array instances are frozen and cannot change. However, you can ha