On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
> Ian, if there is anything I can do to help with Web Storage, please let
> me know.
The main thing we need, I think, is a test suite.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A
Hi Art, Ian
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> All - based on Hixie's Web Storage bug processing today, at the moment,
> there are no open bugs for this spec. As such, I will start (separately) a
> CfC to publish a new LCWD of Web Storage.
>
> Those working on the widget specs
All - based on Hixie's Web Storage bug processing today, at the moment,
there are no open bugs for this spec. As such, I will start (separately)
a CfC to publish a new LCWD of Web Storage.
Those working on the widget specs know the Widget Interface spec has a
normative reference for Web Storag
Well, I guess the good news is that (at the time of this writing), there
aren't 355 bugs ;).
All - Inputs and proposals for these bugs are encouraged!
On Apr/28/2011 2:33 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
What is the plan to address the following Web Storag
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
> What is the plan to address the following Web Storage bugs:
>
> 1. Bug-12111; spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match
> implementation behavior
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
>
> 2. Bug-12272; Improve sect
All,
What is the plan to address the following Web Storage bugs:
1. Bug-12111; spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match
implementation behavior
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
2. Bug-12272; Improve section on DNS spoofing attacks to address user
attack
