> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:ru...@intertwingly.net]
>
> Another way to phrase this question: what would the CR exit criteria be for
> such a WebIDL v1? The reason why I bring this up is that if they are too low
> to be meaningful, that brings into the question whether or not this exercise
> is meani
On 12/03/2014 11:10 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/3/14, 6:02 AM, Yves Lafon wrote:
Pretty much like refactoring XHR using Fetch or not. Most
implementations will most probably move to the latest version, but the
external interface will be the same.
"External interface" being the IDL syntax in
On 12/3/14, 6:02 AM, Yves Lafon wrote:
Pretty much like refactoring XHR using Fetch or not. Most
implementations will most probably move to the latest version, but the
external interface will be the same.
"External interface" being the IDL syntax in this case, not the
resulting web-exposed int
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
> Another option would be to define only the syntax and leave the bindings to
> v2 only, but it wouldn't help much for testing.
Well we don't want to test something known to be wrong (e.g.
sequence). And we want to retain the ability to make chang
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/1/14, 1:49 PM, Travis Leithead wrote:
I believe so; this will give many specs a baseline WebIDL document to point
to in their references at the very least. Many specs don't rely on the more
advanced feature set being defined in WebIDL Second Editi
On 12/1/14, 1:49 PM, Travis Leithead wrote:
I believe so; this will give many specs a baseline WebIDL document to point to
in their references at the very least. Many specs don't rely on the more
advanced feature set being defined in WebIDL Second Edition.
Here's the problem.
As of today, v2
thead
Cc: Yves Lafon; Adrian Bateman; public-webapps
Subject: Re: Help with WebIDL v1?
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Travis Leithead
wrote:
> At TPAC, I mentioned wanting to help move along WebIDL v1 to REC. Can you
> enumerate the next steps, and where I might be able to help? Thanks!
Is
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Travis Leithead
wrote:
> At TPAC, I mentioned wanting to help move along WebIDL v1 to REC. Can you
> enumerate the next steps, and where I might be able to help? Thanks!
Is there any actual value in doing this, since v2 has many additions,
improvements, and bug fi
