On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:57:19 +0900, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
The specification does not state it yet, but it has been suggested that
the maximum time any cache entry can persist in the preflight result
Here is an update on my last status messsage.
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:43:54 +0900, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
[...]
I would very much appreciate it if people involved in CORS (and other
interested parties of course) can read through this e-mail and share
their thoughts. The
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:57:47 +0900, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
After renaming the specification I decided to go through the normative
parts of the specification again to clean various things up and resolve
some outstanding issues. Since the October 6 editor's draft (last
Thomas
Thanks for the careful review.
comments inline
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
On Feb 25, 2009, at 7:06 AM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote:
In reviewing the latest draft, a couple of comments.
Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures
Editor's Draft 23 February 2009
On 25 Feb 2009, at 13:50, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
- 5.2 and 5.3 have an issue about additional algorithms. I suggest
just being silent about them.
ok to remove the issues?
To the extent to which these are about unspecified additional
algorithms, that's what I'm proposing. The second
Hi Laurens,
As we no longer require user agents that conform the the packaging
spec to support any media types, I have added xhtml as a default start
file (extensions are .xhtml and .xht). This will be in the spec when I
next check the spec in.
Kind regards,
Marcos
2008/12/10 Laurens Holst
Regarding the http redirect security violation steps, the spec (
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/) says If async is set to
false raise a NETWORK_ERR exception and terminate the overall algorithm.
I tried out IE7, Firefox 3, and WebKit nightlies and none of them seem to
throw an
Hi,
I have a question about the overloaded operations in an effective
overload set in Web IDL. In the example of 'Interface A' in 3.3.3.
Operation, the Draft 19 December 2008 says,
There are thus no overloaded operation resolution ambiguities for
the interface,
but the following three
Hi folks,
unfortunately I have not been able to catch up with Doug (a combination of
both of us travelling and then I had a minor accident that put me out of
commission for a while), so as far as I know we have no agenda planned for
tonight's call.
The call is booked:
Telephone:
In short, I agree with all actions below.
I do have some implementation feedback regarding redirects, but I'll
start a separate thread on that.
/ Jonas
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
Here is an update on my last status messsage.
On Mon, 09 Feb
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
Hi folks,
unfortunately I have not been able to catch up with Doug (a combination of
both of us travelling and then I had a minor accident that put me out of
commission for a while), so as far as I know we have no
On 2/25/09 7:46 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
Hi folks,
unfortunately I have not been able to catch up with Doug (a combination of
both of us travelling and then I had a minor accident that put me out of
commission for
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 2/25/09 7:46 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
Hi folks,
unfortunately I have not been able to catch up with Doug (a combination
of
both
Thanks for the proposal Thomas.
This proposal requiring Basic Path Validation seems to conflict with
X509Data being optional, the current language that I think we
discussed during the meeting:
Generation:
5c) The ds:KeyInfo element MAY be included and MAY include
certificate, CRL and/or
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:59:06 +0100, Sean Hogan
shogu...@westnet.com.au wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
It might be worth discussing the load event;
http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/events.html#event-load
Seems that it is specified to fire on Document or
15 matches
Mail list logo
