On 8 March 2011 06:33, Joran Greef jo...@ronomon.com wrote:
On 08 Mar 2011, at 7:23 AM, Dean Landolt wrote:
This doesn't seem right. Assuming your WebSQL implementation had all the
same indexes isn't it doing pretty much the same things as using separate
objectStores in IDB? Why would it be
Marcos would like to publish a new Last Call Working Draft of the Widget
Packaging and Configuration spec and this is a Call for Consensus (CfC)
to do so:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/
The changes since the last publication (26-October-2010) are summarized
in the spec:
-20110308
(3) Instructions for providing feedback
This W3C Working Draft version of the Ontology for Media Resources 1.0
specification incorporates requests for changes from comments sent
during the first Last Call Review, as agreed with the commenters and
changes following implementation
On 3/7/2011 5:04 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Mar 7, 2011, at 3:54 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Chris Marrincmar...@apple.com wrote:
Now that ArrayBuffer has made its way into XHR, I think it would be reasonable
to somehow use this new object type as a way to pass
On 08/03/2011 15:08, Somnath Chandra wrote:
We have already started working on Mobile Rendering Engine and Fonts
development which would enable seamless display across platforms and
devices.
That's interesting. Did you know about work currently under way
involving Harfbuz to provide a
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
That could be dealt with by adding methods like ArrayBuffer.discard(),
though...
Scratch that--discarding after postMessage is racy, since the other side
could receive the object before the worker calls discard(). The
I have one point for consideration regarding the scope.
Ref Section: Cross-document messaging
Consideration- should messaging be bi-directional?
For example; in the example within the Cross-document messagingIntroduction
section, document A calls the function causing an event to fire in document
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Joran Greef jo...@ronomon.com wrote:
On 08 Mar 2011, at 7:23 AM, Dean Landolt wrote:
This doesn't seem right. Assuming your WebSQL implementation had all the
same indexes isn't it doing pretty much the same things as using separate
objectStores in IDB? Why
Actually I am not sure now if SQLite uses BDB now (they might be moving to
it though). However BDB definitely now has an SQLite-3.0 compatible API now
and supports better concurrency, as well as AES encryption. So at the moment
looks like i'm moving to using BDB instead of SQLite, (apart from when
On 1/31/11 11:04 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
Hi,
Why is FileList defined as
typedef sequenceFile FileList;
rather than as an interface similar to NodeList? It seems that in
Gecko and WebKit FileList is more like NodeList than as a sequence.
(In the process of going through feedback to
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com wrote:
Actually I am not sure now if SQLite uses BDB now (they might be moving to
it though). However BDB definitely now has an SQLite-3.0 compatible API now
and supports better concurrency, as well as AES encryption. So at the
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:47:47 +0100, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On 1/31/11 11:04 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
Hi,
Why is FileList defined as
typedef sequenceFile FileList;
rather than as an interface similar to NodeList? It seems that in Gecko
and WebKit FileList is more
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11097
Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11564
Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Steve Nester wrote:
For example; in the example within the Cross-document
messagingIntroduction section, document A calls the function causing an
event to fire in document B. Document B should either be able to call a
function causing an event to fire in document A OR
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11257
Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
As far as I recall, we never settled on how key path should be specified.
Right now in Chrome, we allow any combination of .'s and static array
lookups. So, for example, we allow foo.bar[1][2].baz. I don't remember
any
2011/2/23 Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com:
From: jungs...@google.com [mailto:jungs...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jungshik
Shin (???, ???)
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 2:08 PM
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote:
* Pablo Castro wrote:
We
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com
No objections here.
Keean.
On 8 March 2011 21:14, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Tab Atkins Jr.
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Keean Schupke
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:03 PM
No objections here.
Keean.
On 8 March 2011 21:14, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Jeremy Orlow
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.comwrote:
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Keean Schupke
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:03 PM
No objections here.
Keean.
On 8 March 2011 21:14, Jonas Sicking
On 3/8/2011 6:12 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com mailto:pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
Hi Richards,
Thanks for the input. Yes we are aware of the work and investigating Indian
Language /Scripts Complexities on that platform also. Certainly our idea is not
to redo the same work and to address specific issues of each Indic languages.
Best Regards,
Somnath
On 03/08/11, Richard
InkML is a development relevant to mobile Web.
Tablets and other input-rich devices are gaining in acceptance (and
becoming easier to purchase).
InkML is one of the few specs to put forward both a stream-based and
archive-oriented format.
We'll be using it to serialize input between
25 matches
Mail list logo
