Re: Server-Side Events encoded in JSON

2011-04-29 Thread Benjamin Goering
All of this functionality can be built upon the current spec, but constraining the spec to support this convenience precludes other uses. On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Brett Zamir bret...@gmail.com wrote: user to parse the response text, why not simply allow each event to be a JSON-encoded

Re: Model-driven Views

2011-04-29 Thread Olli Pettay
On 04/29/2011 04:11 AM, Garrett Smith wrote: On 4/28/11, Olli Pettayolli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote: On 04/28/2011 04:46 AM, Rafael Weinstein wrote: Would be good to know what are the use cases you had in mind. I'm never sure if I'm using the term use case correctly =-). Our primary

[IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)

2011-04-29 Thread Pablo Castro
We've had quite a bit of debate on this but I don't think we've reached closure. At this point I would be fine with either one of a) postpone to v2 and agree that for now we'll just do binary collation everywhere or b) the last form of the proposal sent around: extra collation argument

Re: [widgets] Dig Sig spec

2011-04-29 Thread Frederick.Hirsch
Marcos I'd suggest you first send an email with the top 10 substantive changes to the list, e.g. which algorithms change from mandatory to optional or optional to mandatory etc, which processing rules you are relaxing, etc this would take less time for you and be much clearer to all. thanks

Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)

2011-04-29 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote: We've had quite a bit of debate on this but I don't think we've reached closure. At this point I would be fine with either one of a) postpone to v2 and agree that for now we'll just do binary collation everywhere

Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)

2011-04-29 Thread Keean Schupke
On Friday, 29 April 2011, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote: We've had quite a bit of debate on this but I don't think we've reached closure. At this point I would be fine with either one of a) postpone to v2

Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)

2011-04-29 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com wrote: On Friday, 29 April 2011, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote: We've had quite a bit of debate on this but I don't think we've reached

[Bug 12574] New: AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget

2011-04-29 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12574 Summary: AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW

Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)

2011-04-29 Thread Keean Schupke
There is always something like UCA: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr10/ which looks interesting. Cheers, Keean. On 29 April 2011 20:32, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com wrote: On Friday, 29 April 2011, Jonas Sicking

Re: Model-driven Views

2011-04-29 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Apr 28, 2011, at 5:46 AM, Alex Russell wrote: On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Apr 28, 2011, at 2:33 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: I agree with much of this. However it's hard to judge without a bit more meat on it. Do you have any ideas for