I am fine with adding it (as CSP), but like Marcos, it would be great
to know the plans for IE and Safari regarding ServiceWorker.
Would it be an option to immediately work on L2 in parallel with L1
being moved to LC?
Kenneth
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Marcos Caceres mar...@marcosc.com
There used to be an anon flag that allows users to make anonymous requests.
4 months ago, it was dropped [1] (lack of followers? [2], [3])
Why is withCredentials not supported for same-origin requests?
Presumably because its default value is false, and changing such behavior would
break
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24610
Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Why is withCredentials not supported for same-origin requests?
Presumably because its default value is false, and changing such behavior
would
break backwards-compatibility?
If so, I request to allow it to have three values:
Hi Rob,
I already suggested pretty much exactly this in
On Feb 16, 2014, at 2:16 AM, Marcos Caceres mar...@marcosc.com wrote:
On Sunday, February 16, 2014, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
tl;dr: I strongly agree (and data below shows) that installable web apps
Hi,
Was just skimming through the Push API spec.
I'm aware that no payload is sent with push message for privacy reasons (as
push service is most certainly a third party), but that isn't mentioned in
the spec.
I suggest adding a non-normative note that:
1. describes the reasons of this
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24691
Bug ID: 24691
Summary: Allow shared Web workers to persist across page loads
from same origin
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS:
On Feb 17, 2014 8:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 2014, at 2:16 AM, Marcos Caceres mar...@marcosc.com wrote:
On Sunday, February 16, 2014, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
tl;dr: I
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24692
Bug ID: 24692
Summary: Define 'default orientation'
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: ASSIGNED
Severity: normal
On 2/17/14 6:47 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
On Feb 17, 2014 8:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
mailto:m...@apple.com wrote:
I personally would like to see it become an official draft of the
Working Group if it isn't already
Yes, me too.
(the Publication Status page implies not,
On Monday, February 17, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
BTW, I noticed there is no Bugzilla component for Service
Workers so I will ask Mike Smith to create one).
I think they bug tracker on GH is being used instead. It's already very active
and it would be a shame to have to
On 2/17/14 8:03 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Monday, February 17, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
BTW, I noticed there is no Bugzilla component for Service
Workers so I will ask Mike Smith to create one).
I think they bug tracker on GH is being used instead. It's already very
Hi All,
The registration page for the WebApps' 10-11 April f2f meeting in San
Jose CA US is now open:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42538/WebApps-April2004-f2f/
Please register for the meeting by March 28.
The meeting page follows. Please feel free to directly add proposed
topics or
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote:
On 2/17/14 8:03 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Monday, February 17, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
BTW, I noticed there is no Bugzilla component for Service
Workers so I will ask Mike Smith to create
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote:
On 2/17/14 6:47 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
On Feb 17, 2014 8:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com mailto:
m...@apple.com wrote:
I personally would like to see it become an official draft of the Working
Group if
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24692
Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24614
Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24612
Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24609
Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24608
Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24695
Bug ID: 24695
Summary: Allowed orientations should be an enum
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24697
Bug ID: 24697
Summary: Use Promises for lockOrientation and unlockOrientation
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24698
Bug ID: 24698
Summary: Expose/lock to the screen orientation angle
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24699
Bug ID: 24699
Summary: Reconsider -primary and -secondary orientations
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24700
Bug ID: 24700
Summary: Should 'foo' be entirely equivalent to [
'foo-primary', 'foo-secondary' ]
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24701
Bug ID: 24701
Summary: Apply Marcos' comments
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24702
Bug ID: 24702
Summary: Apply Anne's comments sent in public-webapps
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
Hi,
Arthur pointed out that the Screen Orientation API WD was not updated
since a long time. However, the ED got a few updates so we would like to
refresh the WD to have a better reflection of the current state of the
implementation.
You can find the current specification at:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24703
Bug ID: 24703
Summary: No easy way to lock to a set of accepted orientations
if one UA doesnt support one of them
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Hi Alex,
You wrote:
This doesn't seem like progress. I'd hope an imperative API would,
instead, be used to explain how the existing system works and then
propose layering that both accommodates the existing system and opens
new areas for programmatic use.
I think Ryosuke's
Thanks for the comments, Tobie. I will provide an update draft proposal soon to
address them.
Note also that I'm preparing a proposal to actually include a message body, and
other enhancements to the current API to broaden support among browsers. I
should have a draft for review in the next
31 matches
Mail list logo
