On 3/24/15 3:07 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 3/24/15 10:21 AM, Richard Ishida wrote:
is it possible to send mail to www-internatio...@w3.org each time
someone adds somethign to the github issue? (this is the list where
we track and discuss issues).
if so, i see no real difference between
so far.
Kenneth
-Original Message-
From: Phillips, Addison [mailto:addi...@lab126.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:43 PM
To: Christiansen, Kenneth R; public-webapps@w3.org
Cc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org
Subject: RE: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications
Hi Kenneth,
Thanks
Subject: RE: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications
Hi there,
The spec authors use GitHub for issue tracking. I duplicated your
issues
there:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues
Thanks for looking into internationalization issues with the current
spec.
Cheers
On 3/24/15 10:21 AM, Richard Ishida wrote:
is it possible to send mail to www-internatio...@w3.org each time
someone adds somethign to the github issue? (this is the list where we
track and discuss issues).
if so, i see no real difference between using github or bugzilla – our
process is
Hi there,
The spec authors use GitHub for issue tracking. I duplicated your issues there:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues
Thanks for looking into internationalization issues with the current spec.
Cheers,
Kenneth
-Original Message-
From: Phillips, Addison
Message-
From: Christiansen, Kenneth R [mailto:kenneth.r.christian...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 1:15 AM
To: Phillips, Addison; public-webapps@w3.org
Cc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org
Subject: RE: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications
Hi there,
The spec authors use
, 2015 4:43 PM
To: Christiansen, Kenneth R; public-webapps@w3.org
Cc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org
Subject: RE: I18N comments on Manifest for Web applications
Hi Kenneth,
Thanks for the reply.
I know you're using GitHub. However, whenever I'm filing/forwarding
comments on a document on behalf
[comments below]
On 2010/03/27 18:49, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Thanks Felix, I will update the schema. However, the BIDI spec warns,
for security reasons, to avoid the overrides so I didn't include them
into our spec. Should I put lro and rlo into the spec regardless? the
spec now contains a note
Hi,
On 27/03/10 9:07 AM, Felix Sasaki wrote:
The spec itself looks fine. It seems that the schema at
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-schema/widgets.rnc
is not up to date yet. It still contains the *ITS* dir attribute, e.g. at
elem.author = element author {
attr.xmllang?,
[mailto:marc...@opera.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:35 AM
To: Martin J. Dürst
Cc: Felix Sasaki; Arthur Barstow; Phillips, Addison; public-i18n-
c...@w3.org; public-webapps; Richard Ishida
Subject: Re: i18n comments:
Hi Martin,
On 29/03/10 10:01 AM, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
[comments below
Hi Addison,
On 29/03/10 5:16 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote:
This doesn't make any sense to me. I think you are over-thinking this.
The author element contains the author's *NAME*. It can also include an href
and an email attribute. UTR#36 refers explicitly to IRIs and IDNA addresses,
which
The spec itself looks fine. It seems that the schema at
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-schema/widgets.rnc
is not up to date yet. It still contains the *ITS* dir attribute, e.g. at
elem.author = element author {
attr.xmllang?,
attr.itsdir?,
attribute href { xsd:anyURI }?,
On Mar 27, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Felix Sasaki felix.sas...@fh-potsdam.de
wrote:
The spec itself looks fine. It seems that the schema at
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-schema/widgets.rnc
is not up to date yet. It still contains the *ITS* dir attribute,
e.g. at
elem.author = element
13 matches
Mail list logo
