On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:05:23AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 28.05.09 01:47, CJ van den Berg (c...@vdbonline.com) wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:33:48AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 28.05.09 00:53, CJ van den Berg (c...@vdbonline.com) wrote:
Well, I think
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 27/05/09 21:51 did gyre and gimble:
On Wed, 27.05.09 15:51, Brian J. Murrell (br...@interlinx.bc.ca) wrote:
Hmm, so you seem to be using the tunnel stuff a lot.
If you mean making the server available to the network, yeah. Just for
the ease of moving
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 27/05/09 20:14 did gyre and gimble:
On Thu, 28.05.09 00:54, Patrick Shirkey (pshir...@boosthardware.com) wrote:
So does that essentially mean that gnome-vu-control and pavucontrol from
Fedora 10 have been integrated into one in Fedora 11?
Kind of:
'Twas brillig, and Patrick Shirkey at 28/05/09 06:31 did gyre and gimble:
Thanks for the heads up. There is no desire to use an api that is not
going to be future proofed. Would you consider having a pajackcontrol
app that uses dbus to communicate with pa and provides the existing api
hooks to
Just noticed this.. happens with pulse volume control...
unload 'module-stream-restore'
Start banshee.. the volume meter in pulse volume control works as expected
Press next track... the volume meter breaks / stops
Not sure if this is a bug or some thing module-stream-restore does to keep
this
On Thu, 28.05.09 20:58, Jason Taylor (killerkiwi2...@gmail.com) wrote:
Just noticed this.. happens with pulse volume control...
unload 'module-stream-restore'
Start banshee.. the volume meter in pulse volume control works as expected
Press next track... the volume meter breaks / stops
LP == Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes:
[=]
LP Could you please extract a minimal test case for me, then I'll
LP have a look on it to find out what's wrong.
Dear Mr. Poettering,
thank for your interest for accessibility. You know that from our blind
point of view
Lennart,
In another thread on JACK/PA integration, you wrote:
I am sorry to inform you that eventually PA will use D-Bus for client
communication too. Already now building PA without D-Bus is not really
supported anymore (read: noone bothers to check if those builds still
compile).
Could you
2009/5/28 pl bossart bossart.nos...@gmail.com:
Lennart,
In another thread on JACK/PA integration, you wrote:
I am sorry to inform you that eventually PA will use D-Bus for client
communication too. Already now building PA without D-Bus is not really
supported anymore (read: noone bothers to
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 04:59:00PM CEST, Jan Buchal wrote:
LP == Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes:
[=]
LP Could you please extract a minimal test case for me, then I'll
LP have a look on it to find out what's wrong.
Dear Mr. Poettering,
thank for your
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 21:31 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm, please try to reproduce this harder. The load limiter only becomes
active when the load produced by PA is very high for a longer time.
As I write this, PA is consuming an entire core:
Cpu0 : 14.9%us, 3.7%sy, 7.4%ni,
As an additional data point...
Another long pause of rhythmbox (i.e. I got up and left the room and
came back an hour later) followed by a resume while PA was in this CPU
consumption and PA is now, no longer consuming gobs of CPU.
I didn't happen to notice how long after the pause that PA
12 matches
Mail list logo
