Igal Koshevoy i...@pragmaticraft.com writes:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Daniel Pittman dan...@rimspace.net wrote:
I am going to mention patchwork again - a bunch of Linux kernel projects use
it to monitor patches that go past on their lists; it could easily capture,
in
fact, not just
Jacob Helwig ja...@puppetlabs.com writes:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:34:48 +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote:
I am going to mention patchwork again - a bunch of Linux kernel projects use
it to monitor patches that go past on their lists; it could easily capture,
in
fact, not just the deliberate dev
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 21:14 -0700, Matt Robinson wrote:
I've verified this works and fixes the error you get if there's non
puppet files. Brice, any chance you could write a test to motivate
this change? I know the puppet_generator.rb doesn't have any tests,
but I see you wrote the original
On Thursday 28 Oct 2010 19:00:13 Markus Roberts wrote:
[...]
Proposed Solution III: Shim with default deprecation
-
Do the shim of Solution II with a deprecation warning and then add a new
shim function with a better API
- Teyo Tyree t...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Would you all be interested knowing what we are working on each week?
Our iterations will tend to have a theme. This week we are working
on building out an inventory service. A high level design document is
available in Redmine:
James Turnbull wrote:
We're back with a maintenance release: 2.6.3. This
release addresses some issues in the 2.6.2 release.
For those using Fedora or RHEL/CentOS, I've updated the yum repos at:
http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/repo/puppet/
Packages for EL 4 - 6 and Fedora 12 - 14 are
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:42 AM, R.I.Pienaar r...@devco.net wrote:
- Teyo Tyree t...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Would you all be interested knowing what we are working on each week?
Our iterations will tend to have a theme. This week we are working
on building out an inventory service.
- Nigel Kersten ni...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
- Teyo Tyree t...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Would you all be interested knowing what we are working on each
week?
Our iterations will tend to have a theme. This week we are working
on building out an inventory service. A high level
On 29 October 2010 15:19, Nigel Kersten ni...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:42 AM, R.I.Pienaar r...@devco.net wrote:
- Teyo Tyree t...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Would you all be interested knowing what we are working on each week?
Our iterations will tend to have a
On 28 October 2010 23:39, Teyo Tyree t...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Like to note a few things about our development shift that we
unfortunately did not communicate effectively in our initial email.
We are iterating on our internal development process in order to more
rapidly deliver complete
On Oct 29, 7:32 am, Paul Nasrat pnas...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 October 2010 23:39, Teyo Tyree t...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Like to note a few things about our development shift that we
unfortunately did not communicate effectively in our initial email.
We are iterating on our internal
On Oct 29, 2010, at 7:19 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
[...]
I'm pretty sure Luke sent this out a while ago and asked for input.
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/InventoryServiceArchitecture
This is my mistake. I sent the next RFC out (Catalog Service) but for some
reason I never
On 29/10/10 19:29, Teyo Tyree wrote:
On Oct 29, 7:32 am, Paul Nasrat pnas...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 October 2010 23:39, Teyo Tyree t...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Like to note a few things about our development shift that we
unfortunately did not communicate effectively in our initial email.
We
Hi Teyo,
On 29/10/10 00:39, Teyo Tyree wrote:
Like to note a few things about our development shift that we
unfortunately did not communicate effectively in our initial email.
We are iterating on our internal development process in order to more
rapidly deliver complete features across our
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:40:48 +0200, Brice Figureau wrote:
I suppose once the iteration is done and patches merged in next, raising
a red flag on some changes will be too late, is that right (at least for
this iteration)?
The patches are being merged into next before the end of the
15 matches
Mail list logo
