On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:33:47PM +0100, Brice Figureau wrote:
On 2/12/08 22:34, Luke Kanies wrote:
On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Lorenz Schori wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:45:02 -0600
Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
It's
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:29:24 -0600
Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I see now what you mean about above/below being reasonable terms;
you have to add the bottom
On Dec 3, 2008, at 1:41 PM, Lorenz Schori wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:29:24 -0600
Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I see now what you mean about above/below being
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can start with 'contains' and 'containedby', unless someone else
has a better term than 'containedby'.
I stand firmly by my suggestion of 'container' instead of 'containedby'
--Paul
On 2/12/08 22:34, Luke Kanies wrote:
On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Lorenz Schori wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:45:02 -0600
Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
It's almost like a container relationship -- the container must be
created before
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 12, 2008, at 3:10 AM, Lorenz Schori wrote:
Hi Luke,
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 23:16:03 -0600
Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I did some more research in redmine and found #428 (Deletion should
invert sort
On Dec 1, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
It's almost like a container relationship -- the container must be
created before its contained resources, and the contained resources
must be deleted before their container. Maybe 'contains' and
'containedby'?
I vote for 'contains' and
Just as a suggestion regarding the terminology:
use
before and after (for now an alias to require) if you simply want
the old behaviour (run before or after another resource, wether it is
deleted or added).
use
need (above in Lorenzs terminology) and isneeded (below) if you want
the new
On Nov 5, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Lorenz Schori wrote:
Hi Luke
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 12:11:54 -0600
Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
files and play with them on a vanilla puppet installation. See the
first one on how to install and use the plugin:
Hi Florian
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 04:04:01 -0800 (PST)
jerico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Lorenz,
I've commented on that before but i might revise my statement. I use
classes almost exclusively for grouping together defines and
therefore i'm not very concerned about class-level
On Oct 25, 2008, at 6:16 AM, Lorenz Schori wrote:
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:48:17 -0500
Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, first i want to say that i'm very happy with puppet and the way it
works. The require-thing is just one little annoyance which really
bugged me long enough that i
On Oct 30, 2008, at 5:22 AM, Lorenz Schori wrote:
Hell Again,
Well, after reading a big part of the puppet source, the rspec tests
and the wiki i'm still convinced that the puppet dependency handling
can be enhanced by implementing my original proposal. I now found a
way
to provide
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:48:17 -0500
Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, first i want to say that i'm very happy with puppet and the way it
works. The require-thing is just one little annoyance which really
bugged me long enough that i decided to look at it closer. So if i
criticize some
On 25/10/08 13:16, Lorenz Schori wrote:
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:48:17 -0500
Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snipped discussion]
Please do not attach your patches in your mails but instead use
git-send-email so that they appear in the mail body. This way we can
review and comment
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:45:34 +0200
Brice Figureau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Please do not attach your patches in your mails but instead use
git-send-email so that they appear in the mail body. This way we can
review and comment easily.
For more information about puppet patch
On Oct 23, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Lorenz Schori wrote:
Anyway, to cut a long story short i propose to add two new meta
parameters called above and below, where the direction is given by
the state change of a resource. Lets assume that we construct a system
from bottom to top (bottom = bare os,
16 matches
Mail list logo
