Hi,
This is my first post on this list, so i'm obviously not a long time
puppet user/dev. Nevertheless i want to propose a change to improve the
semantic correctness and reliability of the dependency handling system
of puppet.
I've been working on some puppet modules to cope with chroots, bind
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:48:17 -0500
Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, first i want to say that i'm very happy with puppet and the way it
works. The require-thing is just one little annoyance which really
bugged me long enough that i decided to look at it closer. So if i
criticize some
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:45:34 +0200
Brice Figureau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Please do not attach your patches in your mails but instead use
git-send-email so that they appear in the mail body. This way we can
review and comment easily.
For more information about puppet patch
Hi Florian
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 04:04:01 -0800 (PST)
jerico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Lorenz,
I've commented on that before but i might revise my statement. I use
classes almost exclusively for grouping together defines and
therefore i'm not very concerned about class-level
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:29:24 -0600
Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Paul Lathrop wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I see now what you mean about above/below being reasonable terms;
you have to add the bottom
