On 2010-05-24 22:32, Hercynium wrote:
Can do. What's the preferable approach on this list? Posting to
pastebin/gist, or directly in-message?
Inline in the message, please. Having to surf to a webpage to view
the information sucks, especially if you read mail offline.
/Bellman
--
On May 25, 2010, at 2:47 AM, Thomas Bellman wrote:
On 2010-05-24 22:32, Hercynium wrote:
Can do. What's the preferable approach on this list? Posting to
pastebin/gist, or directly in-message?
Inline in the message, please. Having to surf to a webpage to view
the information sucks,
On May 23, 8:14 pm, Nigel Kersten nig...@google.com wrote:
Have you considered just pinning this package via a file and requiring that
before this resource?
I have, and already implemented that, thanks! :) However I can already
think of other situations where being able to extend existing types
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Hercynium sscaff...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 23, 8:14 pm, Nigel Kersten nig...@google.com wrote:
Have you considered just pinning this package via a file and requiring
that
before this resource?
I have, and already implemented that, thanks! :) However I can
On May 24, 4:14 pm, Nigel Kersten nig...@google.com wrote:
I believe we actually have a feature request in for the apt provider to do
what you've asked for btw.
Cool, I'll look for it and subscribe. Even though the example I posted
is easily solved with pinning, there can be much more
