On 05-21-2013 08:06, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
One thing we need in future is some kind of regression test
environment, so that we
can do fully-automatic tests of all those storage plugins.
While the needed regression test environment include the needed storage
backends? If not we will have to mak
> The licensing problem only restricts distributing the zfs code with the GPL
> linux
> kernel. If the user is installing the zfs code himself there's no conflict.
> You ca
> install zfs on Proxmox by simply adding the Ubuntu PPA and doing apt-get
> install
> ubuntu-zfs.
This is a big problem,
> The problem with zfs on linux is that it is fuse based mening big cpu overhead
> and bad io performance.
zfsonlinux is not fuse based!
The licensing problem only restricts distributing the zfs code with
the GPL linux kernel. If the user is installing the zfs code himself
there's no conflict. Yo
> > > That is not the problem. I simply don't want to spent any work into such
> > Software.
> > >
> > But you have no problem spending work on Windows?
>
> I have. And I really keep that at minimum.
BTW, this is just my personal opinion. If you need support for ZFS, you are free
to send patches
> The problem with zfs on linux is that it is fuse based mening big cpu overhead
> and bad io performance.
It is only based on fuse because of license restrictions. So the real problem
is the license.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
> > That is not the problem. I simply don't want to spent any work into such
> Software.
> >
> But you have no problem spending work on Windows?
I have. And I really keep that at minimum.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve
I use zfs on ubuntu 10.04 from
https://launchpad.net/~zfs-native/+archive/stable/
It works perfectly on an always on, always used machine. I can't speak for
performance directly, but I am using 12x 2tb hitachi disks with 2 512mb/s rw
SSD\'s and it easily saturates a 2GB nic, even with multiple
On Mon, 20 May 2013 12:05:35 +0200
Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> No it isn't. zfsonlinux.org is stable and useable. I haven't any speed
> testing.
>
From ther FAQ:
"To achieve good performance with your pool there are some easy best
practices you should follow. Additionally, it should b
No it isn't. zfsonlinux.org is stable and useable. I haven't any speed testing.
Stefan
Am 20.05.2013 um 12:00 schrieb Michael Rasmussen :
> The problem with zfs on linux is that it is fuse based mening big cpu
> overhead and bad io performance.
>
> Martin Maurer wrote:
>>
>> > > btrfs is not
The problem with zfs on linux is that it is fuse based mening big cpu overhead
and bad io performance.
Martin Maurer wrote:
>> > btrfs is not stable and is not recommended for use in production.
>> > AFAIK btrfs is not even feature complete yet.
>>
>> and it's horrible unstable... i was runnin
> > btrfs is not stable and is not recommended for use in production.
> > AFAIK btrfs is not even feature complete yet.
>
> and it's horrible unstable... i was running into 4 bugs (using 3.8 and
> 3.9 kernel) while testing it for just 2 weeks.
>
> Stefan
Yes, not the best news. How about stabili
11 matches
Mail list logo
