Hi Yury,
On 21 June 2015 at 21:37, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> Yes, I agree with you on that, but personally, I don't see much of a
> problem with folks out there playing with source to source translation
> and type inference; to my mind that's perfectly alright.
Yes, sorry if I was unclear. It's
Hi Armin,
On Sun, 2015-06-21 at 14:50 +0200, Armin Rigo wrote:
>
> There is not much we can actively do. Of course running a loop only
> 100 times gives a bad idea about the performance of any real JIT.
Just to clarify, from what I understood, they basically ran
timeit.repeat(stmt, repeat=
Hi Yury,
On 21 June 2015 at 14:25, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> In conclusion, I'm afraid there is not much at all to learn from this
> publication...
>
> ... except that, maybe, this kind of papers should be reviewed by
> experts on the subject, and not by domain scientists (in this case,
> astrophy
On Sun, 2015-06-21 at 11:52 +0200, Laura Creighton wrote:
>
>
> http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213133714000687
I'm curious whether I'm the only one to find this paper disappointing?
To summarize, the authors developed a translation system into C++ for a
very restricted subs
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213133714000687
I think some of our poor performance is because they never let the
jit warm up, but should we grab some of their benchmarks and
see if we can do better?
Laura
___
pypy-dev mailing list
p
