Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 4/18/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Would automated inlining be a legitimate use for ast-hacking?
>
> Perhaps, if you can do it in a way that it also works for IronPython
> and Jython...
Would automatically falling back on non-inlining be
acceptable if s
On 4/18/06, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Perhaps, if you can do it in a way that it also works for IronPython
> > and Jython...
>
> Is it expected that IronPython and Jython will have similar performance
> characteristics to CPython? That seems hard to achie
"Jim Jewett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/17/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > > Inlining code obviously addresses this, but that's often
> > > killing code structure.
>
> > Would automated inlining be a legitimate use for
> > ast-hacking?
>
> T
On 4/17/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Inlining code obviously addresses this, but that's often
> > killing code structure.
> Would automated inlining be a legitimate use for
> ast-hacking?
To keep the same semantics, you need some notification that the (
Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>>Inlining
>>>code obviously addresses this, but that's often killing code
>>>structure.
>>
>>Would automated inlining be a legitimate use for ast-hacking?
>
>
> Perhaps, if you can do it in a way that it also works for IronPython
> and Jython...
Is it expected that Iron
On 4/18/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > Inlining
> > code obviously addresses this, but that's often killing code
> > structure.
>
> Would automated inlining be a legitimate use for ast-hacking?
Perhaps, if you can do it in a way that it also works for Iro
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Inlining
> code obviously addresses this, but that's often killing code
> structure.
Would automated inlining be a legitimate use for ast-hacking?
--
Greg
___
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.
On 4/17/06, Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How slow *are* function calls? There seems to be a common "function
> calls in Python are slow" meme. It's never been a significant issue
> for me, but my code is pretty much always IO-bound, so that doesn't
> surprise me. Are they slow enough to
