> On Feb 4, 2019, at 4:11 AM, Ernest W. Durbin III wrote:
>
> The top five vote-getters are:
>
> - Barry Warsaw
> - Brett Cannon
> - Carol Willing
> - Guido van Rossum
> - Nick Coghlan
Congratulations to the new council members! I wish you all the best.
Thank you to everyone else on the tic
[Guido]
> There are some interesting speculations possible about the spread of
> the numbers ,and they give extra data on how the voters seem to think
> and which (types of) candidates are likely to do well in future elections.
Ir was already speculated about before the election ;-) As predicted
On February 4, 2019 at 11:30:13 AM, Donald Stufft (don...@stufft.io) wrote:
Did voting require you to select 5 candidates? Or was it up to 5? I don’t
recall, but if it was the latter that could explain it.
It did not. Voting was "Up To Five" per PEP 13 and PEP 8100
signature.asc
Description: Me
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 8:20 AM Ernest W. Durbin III
wrote:
> Antoine noted the same lack of transparency at
> https://discuss.python.org/t/2019-steering-council-election-results/824/3?u=ewdurbin
> .
>
> Ultimately I chose to initial publish results ASAP at the minimum
> granularity necessary give
[Ernest W. Durbin III ]
> Of 96 eligible voters, 69 cast ballots.
FYI, the total number of votes Helios showed me summed to 340. At 5
approvals per ballot, I'd expect to see 5 * 69 = 345 for 69 ballots.
Are we missing a ballot?
___
python-committers mai
Did voting require you to select 5 candidates? Or was it up to 5? I don’t
recall, but if it was the latter that could explain it.
> On Feb 4, 2019, at 11:28 AM, Tim Peters wrote:
>
> [Ernest W. Durbin III ]
>> Of 96 eligible voters, 69 cast ballots.
>
> FYI, the total number of votes Helios sh
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 16:20, Ernest W. Durbin III wrote:
> I can open a PR to 8100 with detailed results if no objections are heard.
+1
Paul
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytho
Antoine noted the same lack of transparency at
https://discuss.python.org/t/2019-steering-council-election-results/824/3?u=ewdurbin.
Ultimately I chose to initial publish results ASAP at the minimum granularity
necessary given that there wasn’t direction on what level of detail should be
publis
As a voter, I can see the full list of how many votes each candidate
received. I wonder if this should be published somewhere? There are some
interesting speculations possible about the spread of the numbers ,and they
give extra data on how the voters seem to think and which (types of)
candidates a
> On 4 Feb 2019, at 13:34, Kushal Das wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 5:43 PM Ernest W. Durbin III wrote:
>>
>> Voting closed at 2019-02-04 12:00 UTC as prescribed in [PEP
>> 8100](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-8100/).
>>
>> Of 96 eligible voters, 69 cast ballots.
>>
>> The top fi
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 5:43 PM Ernest W. Durbin III wrote:
>
> Voting closed at 2019-02-04 12:00 UTC as prescribed in [PEP
> 8100](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-8100/).
>
> Of 96 eligible voters, 69 cast ballots.
>
> The top five vote-getters are:
>
> - Barry Warsaw
> - Brett Cannon
> - Car
Voting closed at 2019-02-04 12:00 UTC as prescribed in [PEP
8100](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-8100/).
Of 96 eligible voters, 69 cast ballots.
The top five vote-getters are:
- Barry Warsaw
- Brett Cannon
- Carol Willing
- Guido van Rossum
- Nick Coghlan
No conflict of interest as define
I packaged my first release. *wipes sweat off of face*
Go get it here:
https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-380a1/
Python 3.8.0a1 is the first of four planned alpha releases of Python 3.8,
the next feature release of Python. During the alpha phase, Python 3.8
remains under heavy devel
Hi Marc-André,
I find this feedback very interesting :-)
As PG is a sophisticated piece of high-quality software, if that process
works for them, then it may deserve trying on our side as well.
Regards
Antoine.
Le 04/02/2019 à 12:03, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
> I've attended FOSDEM over the we
I've attended FOSDEM over the weekend, where Jon Conway (one of the
PostgreSQL committers) gave a talk about, among other things, the
PG community and how it is structured:
https://fosdem.org/2019/schedule/event/postgresql11/
(the community part starts at around 8 min into the video)
What struck
Happy to see that you like the idea. Our hope is that more conferences
will pick it up as well.
On 31.01.2019 18:41, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 31, 2019, at 2:15 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>
>> To help with growing the team, putting it more into the spotlight and
>> give them a plac
16 matches
Mail list logo
