MOn Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 8:03 AM Pablo Galindo Salgado
wrote:
> > Would it be possible rerun the tests with the current
> setup for say the last 1000 revisions or perhaps a subset of these
> (e.g. every 10th revision) to try to binary search for the revision which
> introduced the change ?
>
> Ev
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 5:09 PM Tim Peters wrote:
>
> [Chris Jerdonek ]
> > It would have been nice to know beforehand if the results of the poll
> > were going to change the PEP.
>
> Don't look at me ;-) Like I said, "I'm not in charge of anything"
It would have been nice to know beforehand if the results of the poll
were going to change the PEP. I didn't participate because I didn't
feel like the poll had a fair process like the PEP's themselves.
--Chris
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 3:21 PM Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> FYI I just updated PEP 8001 wi
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 10:46 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le 23/10/2018 à 18:05, Tim Peters a écrit :
> > The rangevoting site has a great deal of info about all sorts of voting
> > systems. Over a decade ago, Ka-Ping Yee (who used to be very active in
> > Python development) ran some _visual_ vot
Great, thank you!
--Chris
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:44 AM Berker Peksağ
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 1:06 PM Chris Jerdonek
> wrote:
> > Hi Łukasz, I tried signing up three days ago, but it doesn't look like
> I've been approved yet (e.g. I'm not listed
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:47 PM Łukasz Langa wrote:
> On 28 Sep 2018, at 23:55, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
>
> I hope this thread about transitioning is exempt from this call to action!
> :)
>
> This e-mail is specifically re-posted on Discourse so you can discuss it
> there, to
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Łukasz Langa wrote:
> There is a user trust system where proven community members get more power
> in time, for example to fix typos and move topics to a better category.
>
Will committers start out as "proven," or will we need to "re-prove"
ourselves to gain add
FWIW, as an American I don't think it's appropriate to spell out the
n-word in a mailing list, even if it's not being directed at anybody
or even just being used as an example. There's no need, and it can
only cause discomfort or worse.
--Chris
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 3:35 PM, Ethan Furman wrot
I agree a name other than BDFL should be chosen, especially since (as
I understand it) Guido is still BDFL but just taking a permanent
vacation, and the name implies there should only be one.
Also, if we're considering particular people, I think Nick should also
be considered.
Should the position
I apologize if this has already been mentioned on a different thread,
but something else I like about the BDFL model is that it avoids
"design by committee." I think Python owes a lot of its success to its
coherence as a language, which is in large part due to Guido's vision,
as well as making the
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:31 PM, Tim Peters wrote:
> [Chris Jerdonek]
>>
>> I don’t think we should assume that a stalemate would be okay in all
>> cases. There may be cases in which a decision has to be made (e.g. if
>> nothing changes, bad things will happen). I thin
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:07 PM Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 at 11:37 Tim Peters wrote:
>
>> [Tim]
>>
>>> > If there are 3 Elders [snip]
>>>
>>
>> [Łukasz Langa]
>>
>> It looks like the number 3 is popular in this context. What makes it so
>>> attractive?
>>>
>>
>> Likely because it
What will be the threshold of activity? For example, if one hasn’t been
committing due to time but occasionally comments on or opens b.p.o. issues
or reviews pull requests, etc, would that mean the logo disappears? There
is value in having the logo show up when commenting.
—Chris
On Mon, Jun 18,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> ...
> Oh, my explanation makes the assumption that you all already enabled
> 2-factor auth on your email, right? :-) If you wasn't aware: email is
> simply the *most* critical part of your whole online data. If a hacker
> gets access to your
Even on projects I don't have access to, I've also found that running--
git commit --amend
with no changes and then force-pushing (git push -f) works to
re-trigger Travis CI. I believe it updates the date of the last commit
but otherwise leaves everything the same (so no need to edit files).
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Martin Panter wrote:
> In this particular pull request, I think the submitter has rebased
> their commit, and force-pushed it. These days, I notice Git Hub seems
> to forget old commits pretty soon after you force-push the branch they
> are on. I don't think you ca
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 12:17:21AM -0400, Ned Deily wrote:
>> Also, try without setting PYTHONHOME. I'm not sure what you're trying to do
>> by setting that but you shouldn't need to.
>
> I didn't think I needed to either, but when I try
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Chris Jerdonek
> wrote:
>>
> Out of curiosity, why do you want to know? Just anxious to know and don't
> want to wait until the language summit to find out? Or do you want to k
Is the attendee list for next March's PyCon available to registrants?
What core developers are attending? Maybe members of this list that
are going can reply to this e-mail, or someone more familiar with the
speaker list can at least start the list off.
I'm attending.
Thanks,
--Chris
___
I was testing whether Rietveld could be used to review a devguide
patch, and I accidentally created this server-side clone:
http://hg.python.org/cjerdonek/sandbox-devguide/
Is there a way for me to remove it, or does someone else need to do
it? In addition, if "Remote hg repo" URLs on the issue
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 1:50 AM, "Martin v. Löwis"
> wrote:
>>
>> Am 29.12.12 01:21, schrieb Brett Cannon:
>>
>> > It doesn't matter to me who writes the email. I was not thinking so
>> > formally, bit it wouldn't hurt.
>>
>> So has a
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Chris Jerdonek
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 5:28 AM, R. David Murray
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 12/25/2012 5:56 PM, Łukasz Langa wrote
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 5:28 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>>
>> On 12/25/2012 5:56 PM, Łukasz Langa wrote:
>> > I'm seriously considering writing all this as a PEP (most likely
>> > without any personal details). I hope this won't be useful in the
>> > future but it might help having this gathered a
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> This is a continuation of my answer to Christian
>
>
> On 12/25/2012 5:56 PM, Łukasz Langa wrote:
>>
>> Dnia 25 gru 2012 o godz. 13:37 Nick Coghlan
>> napisał(a):
>>
>>> I'm well and truly to the point of caring far more about the
>>> feeling
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>
>> > Did anything come of this? There are now a few more threads on
>> > python-ideas that are almost pure Anatoly-instigated noise :P
>>
>> Back in November, I had asked if anyone had ever given him an
>> official/explicit warning that he wo
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Andrew Svetlov
> wrote:
>> Let's wait a bit.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> From his response to me he seems to be unaware that there is a problem...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, No
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Trent Nelson wrote:
>
> On Dec 24, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>> IIRC, commit privileges have been offered based on the last thread, it's up
>> to Serhiy when he wants to accept them. Perhaps the second nomination will
>> persuade him to accept :)
>
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>> >
>> > All in all, is anyone of the opinion that losing him as a community
>> > member
>> > is worse than keeping him around?
>>
>> No.
>
>
> It's pretty clear that he's
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:08 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:26:15 +0100, wrote:
>> What can we do? Apart from the obligatory joke of nudging him gently
>> towards Ruby, I think calling his behavior out is a good idea. Cory
>> Doctorow also thinks that "many trolls are perfectl
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>
> I had the privilege of joining Google's Mountain View office yesterday, and
> was wondering who else from the core development team works there, or in
> Google in general (in addition to Guido, of course).
Congrats, Eli! This may not be c
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Chris Jerdonek
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Chris Jerdonek
>> wrote:
>>> Is the sandbox repository
>>> something we can create on our own, or do we need to r
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Chris Jerdonek wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Chris Jerdonek
>> > wrote:
>> >> Is the sandbox repository
&g
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Chris Jerdonek
> wrote:
>> Is the sandbox repository
>> something we can create on our own, or do we need to request it?
>
> You can just use the "server-side clone
Antoine pointed out to me the possibility of using a custom repository
for testing purposes:
http://docs.python.org/devguide/buildbots.html#custom-builders
Is the standard procedure for a developer to create and use their own
sandbox repository under http://hg.python.org/sandbox/? Or should we
u
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012, Jesús Cea Avión wrote:
>
> Alexander Belopolsky is a core developer but the bugtracker doesn't [edit:
> but now does]
> have a "contributor form received" flag for him?
FWIW, you can see a list of all such core developers using this URL:
http://bugs.python.org/user?iscommit
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I just cleared Chris' subscription to this list and he has sent in his SSH
> keys (no one has added them yet, though; hopefully soon when Antoine, Georg,
> or myself get around to it).
>
> Welcome aboard, Chris!
Thanks, Brett. And thanks, ev
36 matches
Mail list logo
