Full results have now been published at
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-8100/#results via
https://github.com/python/peps/pull/915
On February 4, 2019 at 7:11:36 AM, Ernest W. Durbin III (ern...@python.org)
wrote:
Voting closed at 2019-02-04 12:00 UTC as prescribed in [PEP
> On Feb 4, 2019, at 4:11 AM, Ernest W. Durbin III wrote:
>
> The top five vote-getters are:
>
> - Barry Warsaw
> - Brett Cannon
> - Carol Willing
> - Guido van Rossum
> - Nick Coghlan
Congratulations to the new council members! I wish you all the best.
Thank you to everyone else on the
[Guido]
> There are some interesting speculations possible about the spread of
> the numbers ,and they give extra data on how the voters seem to think
> and which (types of) candidates are likely to do well in future elections.
Ir was already speculated about before the election ;-) As predicted
On February 4, 2019 at 11:30:13 AM, Donald Stufft (don...@stufft.io) wrote:
Did voting require you to select 5 candidates? Or was it up to 5? I don’t
recall, but if it was the latter that could explain it.
It did not. Voting was "Up To Five" per PEP 13 and PEP 8100
signature.asc
Description:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 8:20 AM Ernest W. Durbin III
wrote:
> Antoine noted the same lack of transparency at
> https://discuss.python.org/t/2019-steering-council-election-results/824/3?u=ewdurbin
> .
>
> Ultimately I chose to initial publish results ASAP at the minimum
> granularity necessary
[Ernest W. Durbin III ]
> Of 96 eligible voters, 69 cast ballots.
FYI, the total number of votes Helios showed me summed to 340. At 5
approvals per ballot, I'd expect to see 5 * 69 = 345 for 69 ballots.
Are we missing a ballot?
___
python-committers
Did voting require you to select 5 candidates? Or was it up to 5? I don’t
recall, but if it was the latter that could explain it.
> On Feb 4, 2019, at 11:28 AM, Tim Peters wrote:
>
> [Ernest W. Durbin III ]
>> Of 96 eligible voters, 69 cast ballots.
>
> FYI, the total number of votes Helios
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 16:20, Ernest W. Durbin III wrote:
> I can open a PR to 8100 with detailed results if no objections are heard.
+1
Paul
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
Antoine noted the same lack of transparency at
https://discuss.python.org/t/2019-steering-council-election-results/824/3?u=ewdurbin.
Ultimately I chose to initial publish results ASAP at the minimum granularity
necessary given that there wasn’t direction on what level of detail should be
As a voter, I can see the full list of how many votes each candidate
received. I wonder if this should be published somewhere? There are some
interesting speculations possible about the spread of the numbers ,and they
give extra data on how the voters seem to think and which (types of)
candidates
> On 4 Feb 2019, at 13:34, Kushal Das wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 5:43 PM Ernest W. Durbin III wrote:
>>
>> Voting closed at 2019-02-04 12:00 UTC as prescribed in [PEP
>> 8100](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-8100/).
>>
>> Of 96 eligible voters, 69 cast ballots.
>>
>> The top
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 5:43 PM Ernest W. Durbin III wrote:
>
> Voting closed at 2019-02-04 12:00 UTC as prescribed in [PEP
> 8100](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-8100/).
>
> Of 96 eligible voters, 69 cast ballots.
>
> The top five vote-getters are:
>
> - Barry Warsaw
> - Brett Cannon
> -
12 matches
Mail list logo
