Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy writes:
>
> On Sun, 20 May 2007, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > FWIW, the full name of the TLP will be: "Apache " - so "Apache
> > PyPache" doesn't roll off the tongue very well...
>
> Yes, Apache PyPache does sound a bit silly. My vote is then:
>
> +1 Quetzalcoatl
Jorey Bump writes:
> Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
> > The whole point of the changes which were made was to draw a well
> > defined line between the code modules used in the web application and
> > which reside in the document tree, or other specially specified areas
> > by way of mod_python module i
Graham Dumpleton writes:
> And that is what the documentation I pointed you at states:
>
> """Note that with the new module importer, as directories associated
> with Python*Handler directives are no longer being added automatically
> to sys.path and they are instead used directly by the module i
Graham Dumpleton writes:
> > When I go to http://localhost/~dpopowich/py/syspath, a simple
> > mpservlet that writes out the current value of sys.path, I do NOT see
> > /home/dpopowich/public_html/py in the path.
>
> You will not see the path listed in sys.path. The mod_python module
> importer p
Graham Dumpleton writes:
> Read:
>
> http://www.modpython.org/live/current/doc-html/pyapi-apmeth.html
>
> Especially the area which starts just before:
>
> PythonOption mod_python.importer.path "['~']"
>
> Your particular issue is mentioned just after this example.
Doesn't work, either in
In mod_python 3.2.x, if I set a directory to use mod_python with a
.htaccess file, I will find that directory in sys.path. That is, if:
/var/www/somedir/.htaccess
contains:
SetHandler python-program
then sys.path will have "/var/www/somedir" as element zero.
With 3.3.x this does not hap
In mod_python 3.2.x, if I set a directory to use mod_python with a
.htaccess file, I will find that directory in sys.path. That is, if:
/var/www/somedir/.htaccess
contains:
SetHandler python-program
then sys.path will have "/var/www/somedir" as element zero.
With 3.3.x this does not hap
Graham Dumpleton (JIRA) writes:
> If mod_python is to still support Python 2.2, which it looks like we
> are still because of Nokia work, then can't use the Python bool type
> yet as that was only added to Python 2.3.
But can't a decision be made? I think deciding by not deciding is
less than an
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy writes:
>
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>
> > Depending on Grisha's preference, I think we should either put the
> > content in svn and have a cron job on modpython.org do a nightly update,
> > or start using the Apache infrastructure for the website. Se
+1 Debian (testing, aka, etch), Apache 2.0.55-worker, Python 2.3.5
Jim Gallacher writes:
> Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> > To confirm Jim's arithmetic anyway, I say -1 on 3.2.6 as it stands.
> >
> > As to 3.2.7, I say +1, subject to removal of problematic test case
> > as already raised and with us at least confirming tests run OK for
> > version out of SVN prior to
Graham Dumpleton writes:
> Daniel J. Popowich wrote ..
> > PS
> > If it's not obvious I'm gearing up to get way more involved...I've
> > been waiting (patiently) for 3.2 to be released and jump in with new
> > 3.3 development...I guess I'm chompi
Jim Gallacher writes:
> Daniel J. Popowich wrote:
> > Regardless, I do not think it is within the scope of mod_python
> > developers to keep users forward-compatible with the underlying python
> > version. Sorry, but IMHO, this is not scalable software engineering.
&
Nicolas Lehuen writes:
> I've just checked in some changes to the Python source code in order
> to support Python 2.2. Now the test suite runs successfully on Python
> 2.2.3 on Windows 2000. I've checked that no regressions were
> introduced in later Python versions, too.
>
> The changes are pret
Jim Gallacher writes:
> Daniel J. Popowich wrote:
> > Jim Gallacher writes:
> >
> >>Jim Gallacher wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Using an internal_redirect messes with some of these attributes but not
> >>>others. Those that chang
Jorey Bump writes:
> > o req.hostname is set by the contents of the full URI, or in absence
> >of a full uri, the value of the Host header (this is what is
> >actually said in the mod_python docs). As mentioned before, in the
> >case when HTTP/1.1 AND the full URI are not specified, r
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy writes:
> I think a properly designed site should insist on its host name, i.e. "I
> see you think I'm gobbledygook.bleh, but I'm going to redirect you to
> http://www.modpython.org/ because that is my true name". This is very
> common with sites that respond to both
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy writes:
>
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
>
> > If I understand you correctly, req.hostname is not reliable in case where
> > virtual hosting is not used. What about server.server_hostname, which seems
> > to be used by the code from mod_rewrite you posted
18 matches
Mail list logo
