Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
> SWIG in my opinion is good when you want some kind of an API made
> available to you quickly, but in a static environment where can put some
> thought into functionality, usability, Pythonic-ness of every approach,
> write documentation with good examples and a
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Nick wrote:
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
BTW, did we ever considered using SWIG to map the Apache API ? I know
it can be quite tricky to use, but it could be a real time saver.
That's essentially what mod_snake did, and why I liked it so much. Though I
don't remember if it used
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
> BTW, did we ever considered using SWIG to map the Apache API ? I know
> it can be quite tricky to use, but it could be a real time saver.
That's essentially what mod_snake did, and why I liked it so much. Though I
don't remember if it used swig or pyrex.
Nick
It looks good, which proves the power of RTFM. We should test it, of
course, to make sure subtleties like virtual host are taken into
account (the doc says so but the code knows better).
BTW, did we ever considered using SWIG to map the Apache API ? I know
it can be quite tricky to use, but it cou
