On 12/24/05, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Tim]
> >> FWIW, test_builtin and test_pep263 both passed on WinXP in rev 39757.
> >> That's the last revision before the AST branch was merged.
> >>
> >> I can't build rev 39758 on WinXP (VC complains that pythoncore.vcproj
> >> can't be loaded
[Tim]
>> FWIW, test_builtin and test_pep263 both passed on WinXP in rev 39757.
>> That's the last revision before the AST branch was merged.
>>
>> I can't build rev 39758 on WinXP (VC complains that pythoncore.vcproj
>> can't be loaded -- looks like it got checked in with unresolved SVN
>> conflict
On 12/24/05, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, test_builtin and test_pep263 both passed on WinXP in rev 39757.
> That's the last revision before the AST branch was merged.
>
> I can't build rev 39758 on WinXP (VC complains that pythoncore.vcproj
> can't be loaded -- looks like it got ch
FWIW, test_builtin and test_pep263 both passed on WinXP in rev 39757.
That's the last revision before the AST branch was merged.
I can't build rev 39758 on WinXP (VC complains that pythoncore.vcproj
can't be loaded -- looks like it got checked in with unresolved SVN
conflict markers -- which isn'
[Neal Norwitz]
> This gives me an idea (ie, wild ass guess). r39680 checked in on
> 2005-10-06 to speed up unicode charmap decoding. Dunno if it's likely
> or not. Gotta run, I'm headed east. Good luck.
Nope, it's not calling any decoding functions at all on Windows, let
alone optimized ones ;
Folks,
There's a bug about number coercion about Decimal
(http://www.python.org/sf/1355842).
The bug appeared after some changes Raymond and I did a few months
ago, solving something else (started to return NotImplemented instead
of raising TypeError, to better work with custom objects that
imple
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> On 12/24/05, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
>> >> The code up to the first failure is short:
>> >>
>> >> bom = '\xef\xbb\xbf'
>> >> compile(bom + 'print 1\n', '', 'exec')
>
>> That sets `a` to point at the start of the string, `b` to point at
On 12/24/05, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're asking a Windows guy about make: bad career move ;-)
:-)
> -uall is helpful in finding bugs. One thing in particular here is
> that test_compiler runs only a tiny subset of its full test unless an
> appropriate -u flag is given.
Not
[Samuele Pedroni]
> PEP263:
>
> """
> To aid with platforms such as Windows, which add Unicode BOM marks
> to the beginning of Unicode files, the UTF-8 signature
> '\xef\xbb\xbf' will be interpreted as 'utf-8' encoding as well
> (even if no magic encoding comment is given).
> ""
2005/12/22, Fred L. Drake, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In general, my worry is less with dealing with spam than with ensuring
> integration of content enhancements before release candidates go out.
Well, I think that the most important part of annotable documentation
is just cuantitative feedback,
Tim Peters wrote:
> [Neal]
>
>>Hmmm, I thought others were running the tests on Windows too. There
>>was one report on Nov 22 about running Purify on Windows 2k (subject:
>>ast status, memory leaks, etc). He had problems with a stack overflow
>>in test_compile. He was going to disable the test
[Neal]
> Hmmm, I thought others were running the tests on Windows too. There
> was one report on Nov 22 about running Purify on Windows 2k (subject:
> ast status, memory leaks, etc). He had problems with a stack overflow
> in test_compile. He was going to disable the test and re-run. I
> never
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Steve> Alternatively, is there any mileage in trying to either get
> Steve> Sourceforge to provide Windows machines in the compile farm, or
> Steve> get Microsoft to provide more software fee to Windows testers?
>
> How about seeing if Microsoft has or will c
Steve> Alternatively, is there any mileage in trying to either get
Steve> Sourceforge to provide Windows machines in the compile farm, or
Steve> get Microsoft to provide more software fee to Windows testers?
How about seeing if Microsoft has or will create a compile farm?
Skip
__
Neal> I guess you might have to binary search by date to try and find
Neal> the problem.
Probably needs to be a binary search by revision. I believe Martin
indicated a side effect of the conversion to subversion was that date-based
updates don't work.
Skip
__
Steve Holden wrote:
[...]
> Alternatively, is there any mileage in trying to either get Sourceforge
> to provide Windows machines in the compile farm, or get Microsoft to
> provide more software fee to Windows testers?
^fee^free^
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> On 12/23/05, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>http://docs.python.org/dev/results/
>>
>>Wow! You get no test failures! I guess nobody tests on Windows
>>anymore. I've been getting test failures for months, and just
>
>
> Hmmm, I thought others were running t
17 matches
Mail list logo
