Tim Peters schrieb:
> [Martin v. Löwis]
>> It's been a while that a failure to build some extension modules doesn't
>> cause the "compile" step to fail; this just happened with the _ssl.pyd
>> module before.
>
> I'm guessing only on the release24-maint branch?
Yes. I backported some change which
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Scott Dial wrote:
[...]
> In retrospect, perhaps "{de|en}codestring" was a poor name choice.
> urllib2 should be calling b64encode directly.
>
> I have submitted a patch to the tracker: [ 1574068 ] urllib2 - Fix line
> breaks in authorization headers.
urllib should also be fixe
[Tim]
> I just noticed that the bsddb portion of Python fails to compile on
> the 2.4 Windows buildbots, but for some reason the buildbot machinery
> doesn't notice the failure:
But it does now. This is the revision that broke the Windows build:
"""
r52170 | andrew.kuchling | 2006-10-05 14:49:36
[Tim Peters]
>> I just noticed that the bsddb portion of Python fails to compile on
>> the 2.4 Windows buildbots, but for some reason the buildbot machinery
>> doesn't notice the failure:
[Martin v. Löwis]
> It's been a while that a failure to build some extension modules doesn't
> cause the "comp
Tim Peters schrieb:
> I just noticed that the bsddb portion of Python fails to compile on
> the 2.4 Windows buildbots, but for some reason the buildbot machinery
> doesn't notice the failure:
It's been a while that a failure to build some extension modules doesn't
cause the "compile" step to fail;
The Doctor What wrote:
> The problem is that base64.encodestring() adds newlines to wrap the
> encoded characters at the 76th column.
>
The encodestring is following RFC 1521 which speficies:
The output stream (encoded bytes) must be represented in lines of no
more than 76 characters eac
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006, The Doctor What wrote:
>
> I found a bug in urllib2's handling of basic HTTP authentication.
Please submit your bug to SourceForge, then (optional) post the bug
number back here.
See http://www.python.org/dev/faq/#bugs
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http:
I found a bug in urllib2's handling of basic HTTP authentication.
urllib2 uses the base64.encodestring() method to encode the
username:password.
The problem is that base64.encodestring() adds newlines to wrap the
encoded characters at the 76th column.
This produces bogus request headers like thi
I just noticed that the bsddb portion of Python fails to compile on
the 2.4 Windows buildbots, but for some reason the buildbot machinery
doesn't notice the failure:
"""
Compiling...
_bsddb.c
Linking...
Creating library .\./_bsddb_d.lib and object .\./_bsddb_d.exp
_bsddb.obj : warning LNK4217:
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Tim Lesher wrote:
>
>> 1. Does this seem like a reasonable addition to the standard library?
>
> I cannot remember ever doing this, or seeing anyone except Perforce
> doing this, and it'll only save you a few lines of code every other year
> or so, so my answer is definit
Kristján V. Jónsson schrieb:
> the VisualStudio8 64 bit build of 2.5 doesn't compile clean. We have a
> number of warnings of truncation from 64 bit to 32:
> Often it is a question of doing an explicit cast, but sometimes we are
> using "int" for results from strlen and such.
>
> Is there any in
Georg Brandl wrote:
> Georg Brandl wrote:
>> [ Bug http://python.org/sf/1541585 ]
>>
>> This seems to be handled like a security issue by linux distributors,
>> it's also a news item on security related pages.
>>
>> Should a security advisory be written and official patches be
>> provided?
>
> May
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 9, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>> 1. Does this seem like a reasonable addition to the standard library?
>
> I cannot remember ever doing this, or seeing anyone except Perforce
> doing this, and it'll only save you a few lines of cod
Tim Lesher wrote:
> 1. Does this seem like a reasonable addition to the standard library?
I cannot remember ever doing this, or seeing anyone except Perforce
doing this, and it'll only save you a few lines of code every other year
or so, so my answer is definitely no.
(if you're serious about
Both marshal and pickle allow multiple objects to be serialized to the
same file-like object.
The pattern for deserializing an unknown number of serialized objects
looks like this:
objs = []
while True:
try:
objs.append(marshal.load(fobj)) # or objs.append(unpickler.load())
except EOFErro
Georg Brandl wrote:
> [ Bug http://python.org/sf/1541585 ]
>
> This seems to be handled like a security issue by linux distributors,
> it's also a news item on security related pages.
>
> Should a security advisory be written and official patches be
> provided?
May I ask again whether this is ha
the VisualStudio8 64
bit build of 2.5 doesn't compile clean. We have a number of warnings of
truncation from 64 bit to 32:
Often it is a
question of doing an explicit cast, but sometimes we are using "int" for results
from strlen and such.
Is there any
interest in fixing this up?
Cheer
This patch looks really nice to use here at CCP. Our code is full of string
contcatenations so I will probably try to apply the patch soon and see what it
gives us in a real life app. The floating point integer cache was also a big
win. Soon, standard python won't be able to keep up with the
Larry Hastings wrote:
> Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> MAL's pybench would probably be better for this presuming it does some
>>> addition with string operands.
>>>
>> or stringbench.
>>
>
> I ran 'em, and they are strangely consistent with pystone.
>
> With co
"Calvin Spealman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know I can not do this, but what are the chances on changing the
> rules so that we can? Basically, since the if __debug__: lines are
> processed before runtime, would it be possible to allow them to be
> used to control the inclusion or omission
I know I can not do this, but what are the chances on changing the
rules so that we can? Basically, since the if __debug__: lines are
processed before runtime, would it be possible to allow them to be
used to control the inclusion or omission or entire blocks (except,
else, elif, etc.) with them be
21 matches
Mail list logo
