Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 07:43 PM 12/5/2007 -0700, Neil Toronto wrote:
>> FWIW, I like it. Though the hash should really incorporate the hash of
>> the type name as well as the attribute's so that sometype.method calling
>> othertype.method doesn't invalidate the cache. Locality makes the global
Guido> I think I've seen this too when running the bsddb3 unittest. I
Guido> think it's caused by a previous test ending badly and leaving
Guido> junk behind that the test suite doesn't properly remove before
Guido> starting. But I don't recall the details.
Thanks, that at least g
At 07:43 PM 12/5/2007 -0700, Neil Toronto wrote:
>Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> > At 10:48 PM 12/5/2007 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
> >> Neil Toronto schrieb:
> >>> So Jim and PJE finally convinced me to do it the right way. :) Thanks
> >>> guys - it turned out very nice.
> >> How does this relate to Armi
I've built and tested the latest py3k from scratch on Ubuntu, Fedora
7, OSX 10.4 and OSX 10.5, and found no issues.
So the code freeze is a fact. Don't check anything into the py3k
branch unless I tell you to. Please file high-priority bugs and assign
them to me if you think you've found a showsto
On Dec 5, 2007 6:34 PM, Daniel Arbuckle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > The asyncore and asynchat modules are in a difficult position when it
> > comes to Python 3000. None of the core developers use it or
> > particularly care about it (AFAIK), and the API has problems bec
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 10:48 PM 12/5/2007 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
>> Neil Toronto schrieb:
>>> So Jim and PJE finally convinced me to do it the right way. :) Thanks
>>> guys - it turned out very nice.
>> How does this relate to Armin Rigo's method cache patch?
>>
>> (http://bugs.python.org/i
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> The asyncore and asynchat modules are in a difficult position when it
> comes to Python 3000. None of the core developers use it or
> particularly care about it (AFAIK), and the API has problems because
> it wasn't written to deal with bytes vs. unicode. E.g. in
> http://b
> Hm... [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced. I wonder what's going on there..
I'm now in an EWT spin-off company. The new email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, I frequently check the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account too.
Raymond
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python
> I never even saw that one. I'm hoping Raymond will have another look.
Great. Will review it this week.
Raymond
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/
I'm planning to freeze the py3k branch in 2-3 hours, some time
after/around 8pm PST (midnight UTC).
If someone wants to do another svnmerge from the trunk please do it
before then -- though we're nearly current so I don't mind not having
the last few changes merged into this release (it's only Ray
I think I've seen this too when running the bsddb3 unittest. I think
it's caused by a previous test ending badly and leaving junk behind
that the test suite doesn't properly remove before starting. But I
don't recall the details.
--Guido
On Dec 5, 2007 5:24 PM, Gregory P. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd expect 4.5 to work fine but I don't know why you're getting such a
strange error, i've never seen that. fwiw i suggest people avoid
berkeleydb 4.6 for now.
On 12/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I noticed that test_anydbm and test_bsddb seemed to hang, so I -x'd them.
>
Hm... [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced. I wonder what's going on there...
On Dec 5, 2007 4:11 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2007 4:08 PM, Kevin Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 5, 2007 5:50 PM, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Dec 5, 2007 12:54 PM, Gary Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > The asyncore and asynchat modules are in a difficult position when it
> > comes to Python 3000. None of the core developers use it or
> > particularly care about it (AFAIK), and the API has problems becaus
On Dec 5, 2007 4:08 PM, Kevin Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2007 5:50 PM, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At 10:48 PM 12/5/2007 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
> > >Neil Toronto schrieb:
> > > > So Jim and PJE finally convinced me to do it the right way.
On Dec 5, 2007 5:50 PM, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:48 PM 12/5/2007 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
> >Neil Toronto schrieb:
> > > So Jim and PJE finally convinced me to do it the right way. :) Thanks
> > > guys - it turned out very nice.
> >
> >How does this relate to Armin Rigo'
At 10:48 PM 12/5/2007 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
>Neil Toronto schrieb:
> > So Jim and PJE finally convinced me to do it the right way. :) Thanks
> > guys - it turned out very nice.
>
>How does this relate to Armin Rigo's method cache patch?
>
>(http://bugs.python.org/issue1685986)
Interesting. A
Neil Toronto schrieb:
> So Jim and PJE finally convinced me to do it the right way. :) Thanks
> guys - it turned out very nice.
How does this relate to Armin Rigo's method cache patch?
(http://bugs.python.org/issue1685986)
Georg
___
Python-Dev mailin
So Jim and PJE finally convinced me to do it the right way. :) Thanks
guys - it turned out very nice.
http://bugs.python.org/issue1560
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pHIJrYc_pnIUpTm6QSG2gZg&hl=en_US
It caches type/metatype attribute lookups, including missing attributes.
Summary of the
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> The asyncore and asynchat modules are in a difficult position when it
> comes to Python 3000. None of the core developers use it or
> particularly care about it (AFAIK), and the API has problems because
> it wasn't written to deal with bytes vs. unicode. E.g. in
> http://b
On 5 Dec, 2007, at 21:25, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> How about this: delete them in 2.6 (3.0 will follow after a merge); in
> 2.5.2, put them inside an #if or #ifdef. Bonus points if you can use a
> condition that's true on 10.4 and false on 10.5, but always false is
> okay with me too, as long as
On 5 Dic, 20:27, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Good to know there are users.
>
> And I use Medusa, which is built on top of asyncore.
>
> Bill
+1.
I use asyncore/asynchat modules in a public project of mine.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Pyth
How about this: delete them in 2.6 (3.0 will follow after a merge); in
2.5.2, put them inside an #if or #ifdef. Bonus points if you can use a
condition that's true on 10.4 and false on 10.5, but always false is
okay with me too, as long as there's a comment explaining it.
--Guido
On Dec 5, 2007 1
On 5 Dec, 2007, at 17:56, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Thanks! The sooner the better given that tonight (PST) I plan to do
> the code freeze for the 3.0a2 release, and Anthony is also making
> noises about 2.5.2 again.
I'm working on it right now. I would like a pronouncement on a
backward incomp
> Good to know there are users.
And I use Medusa, which is built on top of asyncore.
Bill
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-de
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 06:17:34PM +, Michael Foord wrote:
> Can I suggest a new module for the standard library: 'antigravity.py'.
A friend of mine (the person who has suggested "raise without
arguments") recommends implementing it in two phases. The first should be
from __future__ import
On Dec 5, 2007 10:04 AM, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2007 9:19 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The asyncore and asynchat modules are in a difficult position when it
> > comes to Python 3000. None of the core developers use it or
> > particularly care ab
Hello all,
Can I suggest a new module for the standard library: 'antigravity.py'.
Perhaps it could display a particular image on import...
Michael
http://www.manning.com/foord
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/ma
The asyncore and asynchat modules are in a difficult position when it
comes to Python 3000. None of the core developers use it or
particularly care about it (AFAIK), and the API has problems because
it wasn't written to deal with bytes vs. unicode. E.g. in
http://bugs.python.org/issue1067, Thomas s
Thanks! The sooner the better given that tonight (PST) I plan to do
the code freeze for the 3.0a2 release, and Anthony is also making
noises about 2.5.2 again.
--Guido
On Dec 4, 2007 11:19 PM, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4 Dec, 2007, at 22:49, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > O
30 matches
Mail list logo
