Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

2010-05-22 Thread Brian Quinlan
On May 23, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: On May 22, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Brian Quinlan wrote: Jesse, the designated pronouncer for this PEP, has decided to keep discussion open for a few more days. So fire away! As you wish! I retract my request ;-) The PEP should be consiste

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

2010-05-22 Thread Glyph Lefkowitz
On May 22, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Brian Quinlan wrote: > Jesse, the designated pronouncer for this PEP, has decided to keep discussion > open for a few more days. > > So fire away! As you wish! The PEP should be consistent in its usage of terminology about callables. It alternately calls them "c

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

2010-05-22 Thread Brian Quinlan
On May 23, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Brian Quinlan wrote: Rename "executor" => "executer" -1 for consistency with Java. -1 pending an explanation of why "executer" is better Rename "submit" to "apply" "apply" focuses attention on the

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

2010-05-22 Thread Jesse Noller
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Brian Quinlan wrote: > Hey all, > > Jesse, the designated pronouncer for this PEP, has decided to keep > discussion open for a few more days. > > So fire away! Man, everyone's faster on the email thing lately than me :) Yes, I spoke to Brian, and since we're not

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

2010-05-22 Thread Brian Quinlan
On May 23, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: I think the PEP's overall API is good to go. On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Brian Quinlan wrote: On 22 May 2010, at 23:59, R. David Murray wrote: If there is still discussion then perhaps the PEP isn't ready for pronouncement yet. At

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

2010-05-22 Thread Brian Quinlan
Hey all, Jesse, the designated pronouncer for this PEP, has decided to keep discussion open for a few more days. So fire away! Cheers, Brian ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsub

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

2010-05-22 Thread Jeffrey Yasskin
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Brian Quinlan wrote: > Rename "executor" => "executer" -1 for consistency with Java. > Rename "submit" to "apply" "apply" focuses attention on the function object, while "submit" focuses attention, properly I think, on the fact that you're handing something to t

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

2010-05-22 Thread Jeffrey Yasskin
I think the PEP's overall API is good to go. On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Brian Quinlan wrote: > > On 22 May 2010, at 23:59, R. David Murray wrote: >> If there is still discussion then perhaps the PEP isn't ready for >> pronouncement yet.  At some point someone can decide it is all >> bikeshe

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

2010-05-22 Thread Brian Quinlan
On 22 May 2010, at 23:59, R. David Murray wrote: On Sat, 22 May 2010 19:12:05 +1000, Brian Quinlan wrote: On May 22, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote: On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Brian Quinlan wrote: Except that now isn't the time for that discussion. This PEP has discussed on-an

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

2010-05-22 Thread R. David Murray
On Sat, 22 May 2010 10:09:37 -0400, Jesse Noller wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:59 AM, R. David Murray wr= > ote: > > On Sat, 22 May 2010 19:12:05 +1000, Brian Quinlan wr= > ote: > >> On May 22, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote: > >> > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Brian Quinlan > >>

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

2010-05-22 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Jesse Noller wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:59 AM, R. David Murray > wrote: >> On Sat, 22 May 2010 19:12:05 +1000, Brian Quinlan wrote: >>> On May 22, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote: >>> > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Brian Quinlan >>> > wrote: >>

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

2010-05-22 Thread Jesse Noller
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:59 AM, R. David Murray wrote: > On Sat, 22 May 2010 19:12:05 +1000, Brian Quinlan wrote: >> On May 22, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote: >> > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Brian Quinlan >> > wrote: >> >> Except that now isn't the time for that discussion. This PE

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

2010-05-22 Thread R. David Murray
On Sat, 22 May 2010 19:12:05 +1000, Brian Quinlan wrote: > On May 22, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote: > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Brian Quinlan > > wrote: > >> Except that now isn't the time for that discussion. This PEP has > >> discussed > >> on-and-off for several months on

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

2010-05-22 Thread Brian Quinlan
On May 22, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote: On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Brian Quinlan wrote: Except that now isn't the time for that discussion. This PEP has discussed on-and-off for several months on both stdlib-sig and python-dev. I think any time till the PEP is accepted is

Re: [Python-Dev] Ask a question for a script about re.findall Modlue

2010-05-22 Thread Hagen Fürstenau
> Your problem is easily explained however: the second argument to > p.findall() should be an offset, not a flag set. (You are confusing > re.findall() and p.findall().) I filed a doc bug for this: http://bugs.python.org/issue8785 Cheers, Hagen signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signa