Stefan Behnel, 09.12.2011 09:02:
I think Py3.3 would be a good milestone for cleaning up the stdlib support
for XML.
[...]
I still think it is, so let me sum up the current discussion here.
What should change?
a) The stdlib documentation should help users to choose the right tool
right from
Mark Shannon wrote:
I have a new dict implementation which allows sharing of keys between
objects of the same class.
We already have the __slots__ mechanism for memory savings.
Have you done any comparisons with that?
Seems to me that __slots__ ought to save even more memory,
since it elimina
Hi, I Just added issue 13607 with a patch that removes the generator
specific checks and code out of the ceval PyEval_EvalFrameEx() function.
Those parts where moved up into the generator gen_send_ex() function.
Doing that removed the generator flag checks from the eval loop and made
it a bit c
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:18:18 +
Mark Shannon wrote:
For the gcbench benchmark (from unladen swallow),
cpython with the new dict is about 9% faster and, more importantly,
reduces memory use from 99 Mbytes to 61Mbytes (a 38% reduction).
All tests were done on my ancient
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:34 AM, benjamin.peterson
wrote:
> +abc
> +---
> +
> +Improved support for abstract base classes containing descriptors composed
> with
> +abstract methods. The recommended approach to declaring abstract descriptors
> is
> +now to provide :attr:`__isabstractmethod__` as
Am 15.12.2011 12:59, schrieb Hossein:
> I wanted to say something in the bug page petri showed (
> http://bugs.python.org/issue12082 ) however I though about first
> discussing it here. If faking a stat struct and a function to fill it
> solves the problem, and checking for existing files and folde
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:18:18 +
Mark Shannon wrote:
>
> For the gcbench benchmark (from unladen swallow),
> cpython with the new dict is about 9% faster and, more importantly,
> reduces memory use from 99 Mbytes to 61Mbytes (a 38% reduction).
>
> All tests were done on my ancient 32 bit intel
Hi all,
The current dict implementation is getting pretty old,
isn't it time we had a new one (for xmas)?
I have a new dict implementation which allows sharing of keys between
objects of the same class.
You can check it out here:
http://bitbucket.org/markshannon/hotpy_new_dict
Performance:
F
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:44 PM, benjamin.peterson
wrote:
> +# eval_input is the input for the eval() functions.
Shouldn't this be "function" rather than "functions"?
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailma
Hi,
I organize an online sprint on CPython this week-end with french
developers. At least six developers will participe, some of them don't
know C, most know Python.
Do you know simple task to start contributing to Python? Something
useful and not boring if possible :-) There is the "easy" t
On 12/15/2011 3:58 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
1. It is not a proposal, but a defect (well, you may argue, but please,
don't)
You state a controversial opinion as a fact and then request that others
not discuss it. To me, this is a somewhat obnoxious hit-and-run tactic.
If you do not want t
Terry Reedy udel.edu> writes:
>
> It appears you are adding two methods to do the same thing. One is to
> subclass and override one or two functions. The other is to define one
> or two custom functions and attach as attributes. Both seem equally
> easy. (Actually, subclassing takes one line
Antoine Pitrou pitrou.net> writes:
>
> "def filename(self, name)" sounds like a poor method name.
>
You're right - perhaps "def rotation_filename(self, default_name)" is better.
Regards,
Vinay Sajip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.
On 12/15/2011 5:31 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
In response to http://bugs.python.org/issue13516 I'm thinking of implementing
some changes in the rotating file handlers, as outlined here:
http://plumberjack.blogspot.com/2011/12/improved-flexibility-for-log-file.html
The changes (including tests) are
Le jeudi 15 décembre 2011 15:29:23 vous avez écrit :
> If faking a stat struct and a function to fill it
> solves the problem, and checking for existing files and folders is the
> only thing that python needs to be compiled (i'm talking about 2.7) then
> it's possible to fail-check it by just tryin
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:31:08 + (UTC)
Vinay Sajip wrote:
> In response to http://bugs.python.org/issue13516 I'm thinking of implementing
> some changes in the rotating file handlers, as outlined here:
>
> http://plumberjack.blogspot.com/2011/12/improved-flexibility-for-log-file.html
>
> The c
It does have its own file handling functions: Opening, getting the size,
enumerating directories, etc.
It has its own limitations too. No dates supported, folders only one
level deep, maximum 99 files inside each folder, etc.
There is not a function called stat. But I am considering faking it,
w
I wanted to say something in the bug page petri showed (
http://bugs.python.org/issue12082 ) however I though about first
discussing it here. If faking a stat struct and a function to fill it
solves the problem, and checking for existing files and folders is the
only thing that python needs to
In response to http://bugs.python.org/issue13516 I'm thinking of implementing
some changes in the rotating file handlers, as outlined here:
http://plumberjack.blogspot.com/2011/12/improved-flexibility-for-log-file.html
The changes (including tests) are almost ready to check in, but I thought I'd
On 12/14/2011 05:04 PM, Hossein wrote:
If there is anything I should do
You can determine what the code that calls stat() is trying to do, and
implement that with other primitives that your platform provides. For
example, you can determine whether a file exists by trying to open it in
read-
Il 15 dicembre 2011 09:58, anatoly techtonik ha scritto:
> 1. It is not a proposal, but a defect (well, you may argue, but please,
> don't)>
You can't copy/paste multiline scripts into system shell either,
unless you append "\".
It's likely that similar problems exists in a lot of other interact
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> Am 24.09.2011 01:32, schrieb Guido van Rossum:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:25 PM, anatoly techtonik
> wrote:
> >> Currently if you work in console and define a function and then
> >> immediately call it - it will fail with SyntaxError.
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
