.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/VHFUQFEF3TCI6LHLBAUEKMFM2A6V3CQO/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
--
Dr. Gary Herron
Professor of Computer Science
DigiPen Institute of
"string test". Perhaps that should be "strong test", but that would
seem to contradict the sentence which follows.
--
Dr. Gary Herron
Department of Computer Science
DigiPen Institute of Technology
(425) 895-4418
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Guido van Rossum
ar add
on directive.
Gary Herron
--
Dr. Gary Herron
Department of Computer Science
DigiPen Institute of Technology
(425) 895-4418
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscri
And most
importantly, has no need to introduce any "magic" into the language.
Gary Herron
regards,
Kilian Klimek
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
h
;>> s = 'abc'
>>> t = s[:]
>>> s is t
True
>>> id(s)
3081872000L
>>> id(t)
3081872000L
Gary Herron
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Uns
ernative
(of bytes instead of strings) is fine with me, and seems the most
natural choice.
(In fact what I'm currently passing around is strings produced by
cPickle, but I'm assuming that the Python3 version of cPickle will
create/consume bytes. True?)
Gary Herron
_
ail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/gherron%40islandtraining.com
>
>
Hear hear!
+1
Gary Herron
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
rds "Date Revision" ...file list...
The list of keywords it will handle is
LastChangedDate (or Date)
LastChangedRevision (or Revision or Rev)
LastChangedBy (or Author)
HeadURL (or URL)
Id
Gary Herron
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Py
Michael Hudson wrote:
>Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>>>Given the later addition of generator expressions with mandatory
>>>parentheses , the mandatory-parentheses version of a conditional expression
>>>looks less strange to me than it did then ;-). So I could happily use i