Re: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?

2011-12-13 Thread Laurence Rowe
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:18:40 +0100, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote: On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 09:50 -0500, PJ Eby wrote: As someone who ported WebOb and other stuff built on top of it to Python 3 without using from __future__ import unicode_literals, I'm

Re: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?

2011-12-13 Thread Laurence Rowe
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:42:12 +0100, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote: On 13/12/2011 13:33, Laurence Rowe wrote: On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:18:40 +0100, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote: On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 09:50 -0500, PJ Eby wrote: As someone who ported WebOb

Re: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?

2011-12-09 Thread Laurence Rowe
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 13:27:20 +0100, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote: On Dec 08, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote: Well, if 3.2 remains in use for a longish time, then it is relevant, in the broader context, isn't it? We know how conservative Linux distributions can be with their