I don't think this is exactly on the same axis. Being able Python to
build with a free compiler won't change this issue. Scientific Python
won't be only the free compiler version, Visual Studio would remain
the main citizen. It may fragment a little bit more the environment
with people needing to p
Very interesting. Although os.walk may not be widely used in cluster
applications, anything that lowers the number of calls to stat() in an
spplication is worthwhile for parallel filesystems as stat() is handled by
the only non-parallel node, the MDS.
Small test on another NFS drive:
Creating tree
> The core RNG is going to be part of the randomized hashing function
> patch. The patch will be applied to all Python version from 2.6 to 3.3.
> Some people may want to applied it to 2.4 and 2.5, too. As the patch is
> going to affect six to eight Python versions, it should introduce as few
> new
Hi,
I'm not a core Python developer, but it may be intesting to use a real
Crush resistant RNG, as one from Random123 (a parallel random generator
that is Crush resistant, contrary to the Mersenne Twister, and without a
state).
Cheers,
Matthieu Brucher
2012/1/3 Christian Heimes
&g
2010/7/31 David Cournapeau :
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Michael Foord
> wrote:
>> For those of you who found this document perhaps just a little bit too long,
>> I've written up a *much* shorter intro to the plugin system (including how
>> to get the prototype) on my blog:
>>
>> http:
> That's only two points. :-)
In French, we say that several starts with 2 ;)
> On 1; If that's true, I won't mention git again.
I tis, you can check on the git repository (it's a mix of C, perl,
shell scripts, Python, ...)
> On 2; Who knows what their life cycle is.
You can check on their web
> I'd be happy to see bzr and mercurial and git all made it together
> into the stdlib for python 3. That would give a superb updating
> mechanism for python that would propel python well beyond
> the dinosaur badlands of CPAN and other languages.
I think there are several points that make them no
2009/3/31 R. David Murray :
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 at 11:50, Bill Hoffman wrote:
>>>
>>> B. It does not allow the CMakeLists.txt file control the --help
>>
>> output. This appears to be an intentional decision
>> (http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake-promote/2006-May/95.html).
>> To replace it,
2009/1/25 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton :
> according to the wikipedia entry on dlls, dlls do not support data,
> only functions.
What do you mean by "not support data"? Having global data variables in a dll?
In wikipedia, it is explicitely told that this is possible to have
data (http://en.wikiped
(Sorry for the double send...)
2009/1/16 James Mills :
> I've noticed over the past few weeks lots of questions
> asked about multi-processing (including myself).
Funny, I was going to blog about this, but not just for Python.
> For those of you new to multi-processing, perhaps this
> thread may
>> When I learnt C, I was always told to explicitely cast.
>
> Maybe your professor was used to old C :)
That's more than likely :D
Matthieu
--
Information System Engineer, Ph.D.
Website: http://matthieu-brucher.developpez.com/
Blogs: http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog
Hi,
2009/1/2 Alexander Belopolsky :
> First, by copying c++-sig, let me invite C++ experts to comment on
> this thread and the tracker issue:
>
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/084685.html
> http://bugs.python.org/issue4805
>
> My patch highlights several issues:
>
> 1. (
2008/11/4 Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>
>> you *will* have to ship gmp.dll to your users, as well ... So then
>
>> you have to include the source (of GMP
>
> Are you sure? I thought the source-provision requirements
> of the *GPL licences only apply when you distribute
s, arguably, silly. As we've seen in the last 2 months
>Josiah> with Chrome, multiple processes for a single "program" is
>Josiah> actually a pretty good idea.
>
> I have no idea what Chrome is. Is it a CPU-intensive algorithm which can be
> parallelized?
It&#x
2008/7/5 Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a general question and a specific question. First the general one:
>
> (1) When is it okay to use C99 code in the Python core? More particularly,
> is it considered acceptable to use widely-implemented library functions that
> are specified in
>
> As for PDCurses library itself there is a Makefile in PDCurses distribution
> for Microsoft Visual C++ 2.0+ named vcwin32.mak I can't afford buying
> Visual Studio to test if it works with newer versions, but logically Visual
> Studio should be able to convert Makefile to a newer format.
You
Hi,
2008/5/17 Jim Kleckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>
>> In building a package with several platforms, I
>>> ran across the warning message below from Visual
>>> Studio 2008. Should we add the /EHsc option to the
>>> compile_options in distutils for MSVC? Or is it more
>>>
2008/5/16 Hrvoje Nikšić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 08:04 -0400, Tom Pinckney wrote:
> > Here's one example, albeit from a few years ago
> >
> > http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/numpy-discussion/1625465
>
> Thanks for the pointer. I'm not sure I fully understand Konr
Sorry for the double post, Jeroen :|
-- Forwarded message --
From: Matthieu Brucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 21 mars 2008 10:03
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Python source code on Bazaar vcs
To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2008/3/21, Jeroen Rui
Thank you very much !
Matthieu
2007/7/13, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[Stephen J. Turnbull]
> Shouldn't the "until" in the doc be "while"? Alternatively, "true"
> could be changed to "false".
Yes. I'll make the change.
Raymond
___
Py
2007/7/13, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[Matthieu on itertools.dropwhile() docs]
> Make an iterator that drops elements from the iterable as long as the
predicate is true; afterwards, returns every element. Note,
> the iterator does not produce any output until the predicate is true,
Hi,
There seems to be a typo in the doc of itertools.dropwhile() :
Make an iterator that drops elements from the iterable as long as the
predicate is true; afterwards, returns every element. Note, the iterator
does not produce *any* output until the predicate is true, so it may have a
lengthy st
Hi,
I think the complaint is not so much about simplicity, but correctness.
close_fd also closes stdin/stdout/stderr, which might be undesirable
and differs from POSIX.
According to the docs, stdin/stdout and stderr are not closed (
http://docs.python.org/lib/node529.html)
Matthieu
___
23 matches
Mail list logo
