Hi,
No, not a browser cache issue. I was looking for "async" or "await" in the
table of contents, so I didn't notice the new "coroutines" sections.
Sorry for the noise.
-Nikolaus
On Aug 02 2015, Yury Selivanov wrote:
> Nikolaus,
>
> Strange. PEP 492 changes are fully documented since b3.
>
> H
On 2015-08-02 4:04 PM, Xavier Combelle wrote:
Shouldn't at least ayncio doc
https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/asyncio.html be updated accordingly ?
for example
https://docs.python.org/3.5/search.html?q=await&check_keywords=yes&area=default
doesn't mention https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/asy
Shouldn't at least ayncio doc
https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/asyncio.html be updated accordingly ?
for example
https://docs.python.org/3.5/search.html?q=await&check_keywords=yes&area=default
doesn't mention https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/asyncio.html
2015-08-02 16:21 GMT+02:00 Yury Seliv
Nikolaus,
Strange. PEP 492 changes are fully documented since b3.
Here are just few examples:
https://docs.python.org/3.5/whatsnew/3.5.html#pep-492-coroutines-with-async-and-await-syntax
https://docs.python.org/3.5/reference/datamodel.html#coroutines
https://docs.python.org/3.5/reference/compo
Hello,
Looking at the language reference for 3.5.0b4, I noticed that it
mentions neither async nor await.
Is this still going to get updated, or will the only documentation
consist of the PEP itself? I think having a Python release recognize
keywords that are not mentioned in the language referen
