Re: [Python-Dev] subprocess docs patch

2010-02-01 Thread Chris Rebert
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:14 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> Any help you could provide would be appreciated. > > Please use unified diffs in the future. Duly noted. > I'm -0 on this patch; it still has the negative, cautionary-patronizing > tone ("Do not", "can be tricky", "be mindful"), Thank

Re: [Python-Dev] subprocess docs patch

2010-02-01 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Any help you could provide would be appreciated. Please use unified diffs in the future. I'm -0 on this patch; it still has the negative, cautionary-patronizing tone ("Do not", "can be tricky", "be mindful"), as if readers are unable to grasp the description that they just read (and indeed, in

[Python-Dev] subprocess docs patch

2010-01-31 Thread Chris Rebert
Hello mighty Python developers, I was wondering if someone could take a gander at, and hopefully act upon, a patch I submitted a while ago for the subprocess module's docs. It's been languishing in the bug tracker: http://bugs.python.org/issue6760 Any help you could provide would be appreciated.