On 1/26/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> any progress ? does the script work in the buildbot setting, or
> does it need tweaking ?
I haven't gotten to it and won't be able to in the next week+. If no
one beats me to it, I will get to it in a few weeks. I've got most of
the buildbo
any progress ? does the script work in the buildbot setting, or
does it need tweaking ?
> > Neal Norwitz wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Does that make sense? We would just need /f's script in SVN.
> > > > >
> > > > > in python/Tools/something or sandbox/something ?
> > > >
> > > > python/Doc/tools/som
I wrote:
> Neal Norwitz wrote:
>
> > > > > Does that make sense? We would just need /f's script in SVN.
> > > >
> > > > in python/Tools/something or sandbox/something ?
> > >
> > > python/Doc/tools/something?
> >
> > Fredrik were you still working on that? I can make the changes to the
> > bb ma
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> > > > Does that make sense? We would just need /f's script in SVN.
> > >
> > > in python/Tools/something or sandbox/something ?
> >
> > python/Doc/tools/something?
>
> Fredrik were you still working on that? I can make the changes to the
> bb master. I thought Trent's sugg
On 1/11/06, Trent Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Does that make sense? We would just need /f's script in SVN.
> >
> > in python/Tools/something or sandbox/something ?
>
> python/Doc/tools/something?
Fredrik were you still working on that? I can make the changes to the
bb master. I though
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> > My initial thought was that we could ask alpha testers to run this script on
> > their alpha builds, and report back, but it just struck me that the
> > "buildbot"
> > already builds stuff on a couple of interesting platforms.
> >
> > Can buildbot deal with custom test/
Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> A limited solution is just to make the script put the files where they will be
> published by something other than buildbot. e.g. Twisted's docs are built
> from
> SVN by one of our buildslaves, and placed in a directory published at
> http://twistedmatrix.com/users/warne
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:19:08AM +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> > My initial thought was that we could ask alpha testers to run this script on
> > their alpha builds, and report back, but it just struck me that the
> > "buildbot"
> > already builds stuff on a couple of
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> My initial thought was that we could ask alpha testers to run this script on
> their alpha builds, and report back, but it just struck me that the "buildbot"
> already builds stuff on a couple of interesting platforms.
>
> Can buildbot deal with custom test/validation script
> PS If there was a method on ShellCommand, adding a step would be simpler,
> e.g.,
>
> def addStep(self, cls, **kwds):
> self.steps.append((cls, kwds))
Ooh! I like that.
> then we could do: f.addStep(Catalog, command=Catalog.command)
It would be even simpler: f.addStep(Catalog). The comma
> > Does that make sense? We would just need /f's script in SVN.
>
> in python/Tools/something or sandbox/something ?
python/Doc/tools/something?
Trent
--
Trent Mick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.pyt
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> Does that make sense? We would just need /f's script in SVN.
in python/Tools/something or sandbox/something ?
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
[Neal Norwitz wrote]
> > [Fredrik Lundh wrote]
> > > Can buildbot deal with custom test/validation scripts, and collect the
> > > output
> > > somewhere ?
> >
> ...
> It looks like we could define a class similar to Test, such as:
>
> class Catalog(ShellCommand):
> name = "catalog"
> warn
On 1/10/06, Trent Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Fredrik Lundh wrote]
> > Can buildbot deal with custom test/validation scripts, and collect the
> > output
> > somewhere ?
>
> Yes, it should be able to. However, it might change the part of the the
> master.cfg file that defines the build steps
[Fredrik Lundh wrote]
> Can buildbot deal with custom test/validation scripts, and collect the output
> somewhere ?
Yes, it should be able to. However, it might change the part of the the
master.cfg file that defines the build steps from being trivial
(probably something like:
building_python
15 matches
Mail list logo