On 16/11/2007, Gustavo Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I can do that, as well as I can use the 'continue' statement, but both
versions are slightly more verbose and less clear than what I propose.
This should go to python-ideas, I guess. (FWIW, I can see the
attraction of the idea, but I
On 16/11/2007, Benji York [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Carneiro wrote:
I am finding myself often doing for loops over a subset of a list, like:
for r in results:
if r.numNodes != numNodes:
continue
# do something with r
It would
Gustavo Carneiro wrote:
I am finding myself often doing for loops over a subset of a list, like:
for r in results:
if r.numNodes != numNodes:
continue
# do something with r
It would be nice if the plain for loop was as flexible as
I started thinking about itertools when I saw this then I realised
that your question was about changing the syntax to produce fewer
lines of code rather than writing more effiicient code.. seemed like a
case where you could use ifilter.
//Martin
are talking about cvhanging the syntax
I am finding myself often doing for loops over a subset of a list, like:
for r in results:
if r.numNodes != numNodes:
continue
# do something with r
It would be nice if the plain for loop was as flexible as list
comprehensions and allowed an
2007/11/16, Gustavo Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, I can do that, as well as I can use the 'continue' statement, but both
versions are slightly more verbose and less clear than what I propose.
The question is: is this slightly more verbosity and less clarity
worth enough as to make a syntax
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (11/09/07 - 11/16/07)
Tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1323 open (+13) / 11612 closed (+25) / 12935 total (+38)
Open issues with patches: 418
Average
On Nov 15, 2007 12:48 PM, Steven Bethard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 1:18 PM, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 10:30 AM, Isaac Morland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I wrote a Signature class. Instances of the class represent all the
information present
Gustavo Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|I am finding myself often doing for loops over a subset of a list, like:
|
|for r in results:
|if r.numNodes != numNodes:
|continue
|# do something with r
Why write it
* Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-16 18:31:12 -0500]:
Gustavo Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|I am finding myself often doing for loops over a subset of a list, like:
|
|for r in results:
|if r.numNodes != numNodes:
|
On Nov 15, 2007 12:48 PM, Steven Bethard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 1:18 PM, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 10:30 AM, Isaac Morland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I wrote a Signature class. Instances of the class represent all the
information present
11 matches
Mail list logo
