On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Given the changing dynamics of the desktop launch menus to better
support direct access as an alternative to hierarchical navigation,
would it be reasonable to consider including the major version number
in the start
On 21/12/2010 01:57, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Antoine Pitrousolip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Diffing is completely an implementation detail of how the failure
messages are generated. The important thing is that failure messages
make sense with respect to actual result and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On behalf of the Python development team, I'm happy to announce the
second beta preview release of Python 3.2.
Python 3.2 is a continuation of the efforts to improve and stabilize the
Python 3.x line. Since the final release of Python 2.7, the 2.x
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Michael Foord
fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
On 21/12/2010 01:57, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Antoine Pitrousolip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
Diffing is completely an implementation detail of how the failure
messages are generated. The
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Michael Foord
fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
On 21/12/2010 01:57, Nick Coghlan wrote:
My own +1 goes to keeping the actual/expected terminology (and
ordering) and adjusting the diffs accordingly (with a header noting
that the diff is old=expected,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Georg Brandl ge...@python.org wrote:
Since PEP 3003, the Moratorium on Language Changes, is in effect, there
are no changes in Python's syntax and built-in types in Python 3.2.
Minor nit - we actually did tweak a few of the builtin types a bit
(mostly the stuff
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
I actually agree with Guido that anything we do is going to be
suboptimal in some way. Encouraging the actual/expected ordering and
updating the diff output so expected=old strikes me as least bad,
but using the neutral
On 12/21/2010 7:01 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Martin v. Löwismar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Given the changing dynamics of the desktop launch menus to better
support direct access as an alternative to hierarchical navigation,
would it be reasonable to consider
On 12/21/2010 8:37 PM, alexander.belopolsky wrote:
Author: alexander.belopolsky
Date: Wed Dec 22 02:37:36 2010
New Revision: 87433
Log:
Both PEP 3131 and the current implementation use NFKC normalization
for identifiers. Fixed the documentation to agree.
Modified:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
..
A non-normative HTML file listing all valid identifier characters for
Unicode
4.1 can be found at
http://www.dcl.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/home/loewis/table-3131.html
Has that file been updated for Unicode 6.0?
Apparently
On 12/22/2010 1:23 AM, Adal Chiriliuc wrote:
Microsoft recommendations:
Irrelevant.
Avoid putting a version number in a program name unless that is how
users normally refer to your program.
Version numbers are the point of this issue, because people *do* have
multiple version installed.
11 matches
Mail list logo
