On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I'm not sure how useful it is to have a build slave which you can't
commit to having for more than 3 months. So I'm -0 on adding this
slave, but it is up to Antoine to decide.
I am likely switch to places within 3
On 05/01/2012 01:12 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
That would be great! First thing is addressing Guido's concerns from
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117515.html and
then handling any issues you found. Not sure if Larry was asking about
this out of curiosity or because he too
On 02.05.2012 08:07, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Martin v. Löwismar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I'm not sure how useful it is to have a build slave which you can't
commit to having for more than 3 months. So I'm -0 on adding this
slave, but it is up to Antoine to decide.
Right now the CPython trunk religiously declares all variables at the
tops of scopes, before any code, because this is all C89 permits. Back
in the 90s all the C compilers took a page out of the C++ playbook and
independently, but nearly without exception, extended the language to
allow
Georg Brandl wrote:
On behalf of the Python development team, I'm happy to announce the
third alpha release of Python 3.3.0.
This is a preview release, and its use is not recommended in
production settings.
Python 3.3 includes a range of improvements of the 3.x series, as well
as easier
On Wed, 02 May 2012 01:43:32 -0700
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
I realize we can't jump to C99 because of A Certain Compiler. (Its name
rhymes with Bike Row Soft Frizz You All See Muss Muss.) But even that
compiler added this extension in the early 90s.
Do we officially
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Mark Shannon m...@hotpy.org wrote:
Or maybe three parts?
New features.
Behavioural changes (i.e. bug fixes)
Performance enhancements
The release PEPs are mainly there for *our* benefit, not end users.
For end users, it's the What's New document that matters.
Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Mark Shannon m...@hotpy.org wrote:
Or maybe three parts?
New features.
Behavioural changes (i.e. bug fixes)
Performance enhancements
The release PEPs are mainly there for *our* benefit, not end users.
For end users, it's the What's New
On May 2, 2012 6:00 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Wed, 02 May 2012 01:43:32 -0700
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
I realize we can't jump to C99 because of A Certain Compiler. (Its name
rhymes with Bike Row Soft Frizz You All See Muss Muss.) But even that
Matt Joiner, 02.05.2012 15:37:
On May 2, 2012 6:00 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Wed, 02 May 2012 01:43:32 -0700
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
I realize we can't jump to C99 because of A Certain Compiler. (Its name
rhymes with Bike Row Soft Frizz You All See Muss Muss.) But even
On Wed, 02 May 2012 21:37:35 +0800, Matt Joiner anacro...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 2, 2012 6:00 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Wed, 02 May 2012 01:43:32 -0700
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
I realize we can't jump to C99 because of A Certain Compiler. (Its
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
I'm not sure if MSVC and MSVC++ are the same thing, but I surely remember
reports by MSVC users only a few years ago that Cython generated C code
contained a declaration after an executed code at some point, and that
Hi all,
Are the download pages for older Python versions supposed to be kept up
to date at all? I just noticed that the 2.4.6 download page
(http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.4.6/) says things like
Python 2.4 is now in security-fix-only mode (whereas in fact it no
longer gets even
On Wed, 2 May 2012 14:07:09 +0800
Senthil Kumaran sent...@uthcode.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I'm not sure how useful it is to have a build slave which you can't
commit to having for more than 3 months. So I'm -0 on adding this
slave,
On Wed, 2 May 2012 13:13:15 +1000
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Senthil Kumaran sent...@uthcode.com wrote:
Also, I think the instructions in the wiki could be improved. I was
not able to su - buildbot after installing through package manager. I
shall
On 5/2/2012 10:16 AM, Carl Meyer wrote:
Hi all,
Are the download pages for older Python versions supposed to be kept up
to date at all? I just noticed that the 2.4.6 download page
(http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.4.6/) says things like
Python 2.4 is now in security-fix-only mode
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
What are the characteristics of your machine? We already have several
Linux x86/x86-64 buildbots... That said, we could also toy with other
build options if someone has a request about that.
It is not very unique. It
On 2 May 2012, at 16:55, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 5/2/2012 10:16 AM, Carl Meyer wrote:
Hi all,
Are the download pages for older Python versions supposed to be kept up
to date at all? I just noticed that the 2.4.6 download page
(http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.4.6/) says things like
On Thu, 3 May 2012 00:25:05 +0800
Senthil Kumaran sent...@uthcode.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
What are the characteristics of your machine? We already have several
Linux x86/x86-64 buildbots... That said, we could also toy with other
On 02/05/2012 19.33, Michael Foord wrote:
On 2 May 2012, at 16:55, Terry Reedy wrote:
I would send the above to webmas...@python.org (should be at the bottom of
pages). We develop CPython but do not directly manage the website.
Not true. The download pages are administered by the release
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/05/2012 19.33, Michael Foord wrote:
On 2 May 2012, at 16:55, Terry Reedy wrote:
I would send the above to webmas...@python.org (should be at the bottom
of pages). We develop CPython but do not directly manage
On 02.05.2012 17:55, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 5/2/2012 10:16 AM, Carl Meyer wrote:
Hi all,
Are the download pages for older Python versions supposed to be kept up
to date at all? I just noticed that the 2.4.6 download page
(http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.4.6/) says things like
Python
Are the download pages for older Python versions supposed to be kept up
to date at all?
I occasionally update them when I see issues with them. Your specific
issue, I missed so far.
If you would like to make this kind of update, please let me know.
Regards,
Martin
On 2012-05-01, at 4:12 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
That would be great! First thing is addressing Guido's concerns from
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117515.html and then
handling any issues you found. Not sure if Larry was asking about this out of
curiosity or
On 2012-05-02, at 2:46 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 05/01/2012 01:12 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
That would be great! First thing is addressing Guido's concerns from
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117515.html and then
handling any issues you found. Not sure if Larry was
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:33 AM, victor.stinner
python-check...@python.org wrote:
+ if (start = length || end start) {
+ assert(end == length);
+ return PyUnicode_New(0, 0);
+ }
That assert doesn't look right.
Consider:
abc[4:1]
Unless I'm missing something, end will
+ if (start = length || end start) {
+ assert(end == length);
+ return PyUnicode_New(0, 0);
+ }
That assert doesn't look right.
Oh, you're right. I added it for the first case: start=length. But
the assertion is really useless, I removed it. Thanks!
Victor
27 matches
Mail list logo
