in
PCG and Random123 too ;-)
Quite so!
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
(all?) relevant dimensions.
http://xorshift.di.unimi.it/
I'm favorable to the PCG family these days, though xorshift* and Random123 are
reasonable alternatives.
http://www.pcg-random.org/
https://www.deshawresearch.com/resources_random123.html
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to b
s or the analysis, and it isn't
really germane to Chris' historical question. I mention it only because I had
just run across this paper last night, so it was fresh in my mind when you
mentioned studies on the subject.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world
t was written, and I personally witnessed all of the history myself so I
don't need it repeated back to me.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an u
ject o2)
not a pointer to PyObject?
Typo, I'm fairly certain.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying
l(x, y, Py_EQ) treats identical objects as equal.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/79e5bb0d9b8e/Objects/object.c#l716
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though i
-- ./child_script.py --no-verbose --etc
This is a common idiom across many argument processors. parse_known_args() is
not a good solution for this situation even if you mitigate the prefix issue.
Exact matches of --options are still possible.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that t
On 2013-06-14 23:31, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2013-06-14 21:55, R. David Murray wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:12:00 +0200, Martin Schultz wrote:
2. Testing for empty lists or empty ndarrays:
In principle, `len(x) == 0` will do the trick. **BUT** there are several
caveats here:
- `len
(rarer still is testing for emptiness not knowing if it is an array or some
other sequence). What people usually want from bool(some_array) is either
some_array.all() or some_array.any(). In the face of this ambiguity, numpy
refuses the temptation to guess and raises an exception explaining matt
4, 0), dtype=float64)
[~]
|5> np.empty([3,4,0])[1]
array([], shape=(4, 0), dtype=float64)
[~]
|6> len(np.empty([3,4,0]))
3
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret
predictable. I have never seen
__subclasses__ actually used in production code, so I'm wondering
whether someone might be affected by such a change.
I do use a package that does use __subclasses__ in production code, but the
order is unimportant.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believ
projects would be making use of this
ability already -- just think of uses for numpy's subclasses of "float".
We don't.
[~]
|1> type(float(np.float64(1.0)))
float
[~]
|2> type(int(np.int32(1)))
int
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an
mean that they have given you permission
to redistribute it. If the agreements that you have with the copyright owner do
not mention redistribution, you do not have permission to redistribute it.
IANAL, TINLA.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a har
s revived, mostly by
the press, to describe officials in the Nixon and Ford administrations and
continues today.
"""
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._executive_branch_%27czars%27
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
th
this is a problem with "stat calls"?
All he said is that reading about that problem and its solution gave him an idea
about dealing with stat call overhead. The cost of stat calls has demonstrated
itself to be a significant problem in other, more typical contexts.
--
Robert Kern
&qu
n, yes, they are probably mostly
using 90+.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:35, Alexander Belopolsky
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> ..
>> And in fact, 0.0/0.0 is covered by the more general rule that x/0.0 raises
>> ZeroDivisionError, not a rule that converts IEEE-754 INVALID excepti
On 4/29/11 1:35 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
Actually, Python treats all NaNs as quiet NaNs and never signalling NaNs.
Sorry, did I get that backwards? I thought it was signalling NANs that cause
a signal (in Python
this helps anyone.
Actually, Python treats all NaNs as quiet NaNs and never signalling NaNs.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth.&qu
of inputs and
"confirm" their guess as to the general rule from that.
But your point stands, numpy arrays cannot be members of sets or keys of dicts
or orderable/"in-able" elements of lists.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a
On 4/28/11 11:55 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
Smaller, certainly. But now it's a trilemma. :-)
1. Have just np.float64 and np.complex128 scalars follow the Python float
semantics since they subclass Python float and complex, respective
do states. Some bugs only show up under -O, so you
ought to be running your test suite under -O, too.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying trut
On 4/28/11 12:37 AM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2011-04-27 23:24 , Guido van Rossum wrote:
..
So do new masks get created when the outcome of an elementwise
operation is a NaN?
No.
Yes.
from MA import array
print array([0])/array
On 4/27/11 11:54 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2011-04-27 23:01 , Guido van Rossum wrote:
And I wouldn't want to change that. It sounds like NumPy wouldn't be
much affected if we were to change this (which I'm not saying we
On 2011-04-27 23:24 , Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
..
I suspect most of us would oppose changing it on general
backwards-compatibility grounds rather than actually *liking* the
On 2011-04-27 23:01 , Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
But for dtype=float arrays (which contain C doubles, not Python objects) we
use C semantics. Literally, we use whatever C's == operator gives us for the
two double values. Since there
On 2011-04-27 22:16 , Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
On 4/27/11 12:44 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 4/27/2011 10:53 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Maybe we should just call off the odd NaN comparison behavior?
Eiffel seems to have survived, though
s an array, not a bool, so we can't do containment tests for
lists of arrays), so NaN is pretty easy to explain afterward.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it
numpy/npy_3kcompat.h#L299
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
___
Pyth
On 2010-12-12 21:30 , Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
level = getattr(logging, opt.logLevel)
While this is the approach I would recommend, it does have a couple of
downsides:
1. An upper() call is also needed to allow strings like "info"
gging, opt.logLevel)
or
level = logging._levelNames[opt.logLevel]
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
es them further. :-)
On 12/8/10 11:43 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
Robert Kern gmail.com> writes:
I don't think the warning helps much, if at all.
Perhaps not. I'm not so hung up on the importance of the message now, but it
certainly *was* important when logging was first introduced,
On 12/8/10 2:51 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
Robert Kern gmail.com> writes:
I really don't understand how this view can be consistent with the
practice of adding NullHandler to loggers. If this message is so important
to prevent misconfiguration, then why should a library author decide to
On 2010-12-07 17:58 , Vinay Sajip wrote:
Robert Kern gmail.com> writes:
If I had my druthers, I would simply remove the "No handlers could be
found for logger XXX" message. If we always wrote entire applications
from the ground up, it makes a lot of sense. The person that wr
On 12/7/10 4:59 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
On 12/7/10 2:26 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
This issue was brought to my notice today:
http://bugs.python.org/issue10626
and reference was made in the comments to possible obstacles facing stdlib
maintainers who might wish to use logging in the stdlib and in
or him to add logging to his application.
This is only my personal anecdotal experience, but the current behavior has
always wasted my time and never saved any of my time.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our
u are trying to emulate
does. It looks like it is building up a list of values, not defining a function.
If you take your question over to python-list, I can explain more.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by
ial checkout happens to be slower, but I don't know whose fault that
is. I'm still using Mercurial 1.5.1 on my OS X box, and while I wasn't doing
much that would take up CPU or bandwidth, I wasn't trying especially hard to
prevent such interference, either.
--
Robert Kern
thing about Sphinx's docstring extraction features in
contrast with other such tools. It doesn't generate a manual from the
docstrings; it makes you explicitly reference the docstrings into the manual's
text. This would fit in very naturally with Python's library reference.
--
Rober
the appropriate /usr/shared/ subdirectory.
Writing portable libraries (with portable setup.py files!) is difficult to do
that way, though.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpre
On 2010-03-29 01:17 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2010-03-27 00:32 , David Cournapeau wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
On Mar 26, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Xavier Morel wrote:
How about raising an exception
and other
such methods. They do not, and should not, know about isnan().
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying trut
. We can control whether invalid operations raises
an exception or not, we had isnan/isfinite for a long time, and the
fact that nan != nan has never been a real problem AFAIK.
Nonetheless, the closer our float arrays are to Python's float type, the happier
I will be.
--
Robert Kern
&q
Not at all. This is quite incorrect for most use cases. Fuzzy comparisons are
sometimes useful for equality testing, but almost never for ordering.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt t
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:31, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:35:46 -0600, Robert Kern wrote:
>> On 2010-03-08 15:20 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
>> > Mark Russell wrote:
>> >> Boolean flags are a common enough case that I'd be inc
d spelling
add_flag():
http://code.google.com/p/argparse/issues/detail?id=62
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying
On 2010-02-11 17:57 PM, Holger Krekel wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2010-02-11 16:20 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Guido van Rossumwrites:
The argument that a unittest framework shouldn't be "abused" for
regression tests (or integration tests,
the latter kinds of tests also could use setUpClass/setUpModule. It would be a
waste (and honestly kind of ridiculous) to force people to use a whole new
framework (which would duplicate unittest in almost its entirety) for want of
those two methods.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to
other kinds of tests).
nosetests allows you to write such module-level and class-level setup and
teardown functions.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
version of coverage:
http://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/src/tip/coverage/execfile.py
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying
ages, let them use the services that already exist for *just* that purpose
like Ohloh. They have the time and energy to implement these mechanisms with the
care and attention that they need.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
e time for word of the poll
to propagate through Twitter, blogs, etc.
You should also make an announcement on python-announce.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though i
It is a common expectation, but a false one. __eq__ and __ne__ are explicitly
allowed to return anything, not just bools.
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0207/
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own m
ns, open source projects don't really "assign" work. If you
want to help, help. Don't wait for someone to tell you exactly what to do. No
one will. Go to the tracker, find something interesting, and do it.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an
ines which give different doctest results on different platforms.
Using a consistent routine would actually improve the ability to use doctests in
that one regard. It certainly would make writing examples much more consistent,
particularly for those of us that use infs and nans frequently.
--
Robert Ker
e case, as mentioned earlier, was for debugging your parser on the
interactive prompt. A custom subclass may also be able to hold more
machine-readable information about the error than the formatted error message,
but I don't have any particular use cases about what may be the most useful.
--
capsulated in the _SubparsersAction class. You can register a
new class for it:
parser.register('action', 'parsers', MySubParsersAction)
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own ma
://argparse.googlecode.com/svn/tags/r101/doc/other-methods.html#sub-commands
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
grams that use wxPython and PyQt on
Windows that print to stdout/stderr, and they appear to work fine.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
his role for optparse. It might be straightforward to
port it to argparse.
http://cfgparse.sourceforge.net/
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an under
On 2009-08-25 13:29 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2009-08-25 12:37 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
In retrospect, it should have been called sys._setdefaultencoding().
That sends an extra signal that it's not meant for genera
f the function than the current situation.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
ation is Lib/distutils within the standard library.
He said "docutils", not "distutils".
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though
line number
information. You need to stub warnings.warn_explicit().
>>> import warnings
>>> def mywarn_explicit(*args):
... print 'xx', args
...
>>> warnings.warn_explicit = mywarn_explicit
>>> compile("def f():\n a = 1\n global a\n", "",
On 2009-05-30 21:02, Greg Ewing wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
The 'single' mode, which is used for the REPL, is a bit different than
'exec', which is used for modules. This difference lets you insert
"blank" lines of whitespace into a function definition without exit
lets you insert "blank" lines of
whitespace into a function definition without exiting the definition. Ending
with a truly empty line does not cause the IndentationError, so the REPL can
successfully compile the code, signaling that the user has finished typing the
function.
--
Robert K
ystem-wide boolean somewhere. One would have to query the target directory
for this information. I am not aware of the existence of code that does such a
query, though.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our
dateutil seems like another
possibility. That would guarantee an instant user base. From there, if it
is found to be useful it could make the leap to be part of the datetime
module.
dateutil.relativedelta appears to do everything monthdelta does and more in a
general way. Adding monthdelta to dateut
On 2009-04-16 17:17, Paul Moore wrote:
2009/4/16 Robert Kern:
from dateutil.relativedelta import *
dt = relativedelta(months=1)
dt
relativedelta(months=+1)
from datetime import datetime
datetime(2009, 1, 15) + dt
datetime.datetime(2009, 2, 15, 0, 0)
datetime(2009, 1, 31) + dt
gt;> datetime(2009, 1, 15) + dt
datetime.datetime(2009, 2, 15, 0, 0)
>>> datetime(2009, 1, 31) + dt
datetime.datetime(2009, 2, 28, 0, 0)
>>> dt.months
1
>>> datetime(2009, 1, 31) + relativedelta(years=-1)
datetime.datetime(2008, 1, 31, 0, 0)
--
Robert Kern
"I h
rough the code manually, the
performance is not all that important. However, up until that breakpoint, you
are running a lot of code "in bulk". It would be useful to have a performant
trace function that interferes with that code the least.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe
x=pretty.pretty(sys.modules)
10 loops, best of 3: 39.9 ms per loop
In [13]: len(sys.modules)
Out[13]: 517
The comparison is somewhat dodgy, though. pretty is not so much a refactoring of
pprint as a reimplementation, so the time differences may not be due to the
dispatch.
--
Robert Kern
"I have
rth looking at Armin Ronacher's pretty.py for a starting point.
http://dev.pocoo.org/hg/sandbox/file/tip/pretty
I've been using it as my default displayhook under IPython for a few weeks now.
It uses a combination of a function registry and a __pretty__ special method to
find the right pretty
ite matrix object. I don't think there are many
scientists/engineers/whatnot who want to double the number of operators to learn
or who care if the matmult operator works on lists of lists or anything else in
the standard library.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole w
___ entrypoint: test_nicefail
def test_nicefail():
x = 12
E assert x == 10
> assert 12 == 10
[/Users/rkern/test_nicefail.py:3]
______
tests finish
pt on OS X 10.5. It's not
specific to Python, and I haven't seen it cause any actual problems.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying
> ``readonly``
While the original could be reworded ("product of the elements of the shape
array"), the amendment is incorrect. For a shape array like {4*5*6}, the number
of bytes is (4*5*6)*bytes_per_item, not 3*bytes_per_item.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe th
because of name '*scientific* tools for python'.
> However, if it supports - ignore following text block]
You are right. We have no tools in numpy or scipy for decimal arithmetic. The
focus of numpy is arrays. This decimal module is complementary to numpy and vice
versa.
--
Robert Kern
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 9/4/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The 3.x compatibility break (however alleviated by 2to3) makes a nice clean
>> cutoff. The numpy that works on Pythons 3.x would essentially be a port from
>> the
>> current numpy.
n three.
I invite Greg and Steven and whoever else is interested to discuss ideas for the
PEP on numpy-discussion. I'm skeptical, seeing what currently has been
suggested, but some more details could easily allay that.
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
--
Robert
he numpy project needs to extend
that feature set, we'll provide the manpower ourselves.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret
specter, which determines
the order in which introspecters are tried -- introspecters with lower
numbers are tried first. The standard introspecters have priorities
ranging from 20 to 30. The default priority (10) will place new
introspecters before standard introspecters.
&q
t;> PEP. It's a unification effort not yet-another-method.
>
> As I unification mechanism, I think it is insufficient. I doubt it
> can express all the concepts that ctypes supports.
What do you think is missing that can't be added?
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe th
tribution?
We at Enthought are moving towards distributing a smallish bootstrap
distribution and provide most of the packages as eggs. Upgrades should then be
an easy_install away.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made te
note along the lines of Josiah wrote about
there being no guarantees despite period size would also be useful.
OTOH, isn't the exact PRNG algorithm considered an implementation detail? It
certainly was when the module migrated from Wichmann-Hill to the Mersenne
Twister. OTGH, I don't fo
er again on numpy-discussion. The upshot is
that numpy no longer creates rank-zero arrays unless if the user really asks for
one. The remaining use cases are documented here:
http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/wiki/ZeroRankArray
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is
s volunteered to manage them so that
> people can band together to help push their favorite tracker.
FWIW: Trac has a Sourceforge bug tracker import script:
http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/browser/trunk/contrib/sourceforge2trac.py
Apologies: for the other blank reply.
--
Robert Kern
[EMAI
w and as a test data set for the various trackers).
>
> -Brett
> ___
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/o
ays a numeric operation for arrays, never a sequence operation. When numpy
arrays are on the LHS of an inplace operation, everything works consistently.
The issue seems to arise from the fact that PyNumber_InPlaceAdd tries to coerce
the LHS and the RHS to a common numerical type first before t
scipy.org/scipy/scipy_core/changeset/1490
Here's some code that eats up memory with rev1488, but not with the HEAD:
"""
import scipy
a = scipy.arange(10)
for i in xrange(10000000):
x = a[5]
"""
--
Robert Kern
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"In the fields of he
cipy_core, but
that's not being used in the code that blows up and has nothing to do
with the problem Travis is talking about.
--
Robert Kern
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"In the fields of hell where the grass grows high
Are the graves of dreams allowed to die."
-- Richard Harter
gt;
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-January/019178.html
>
> (I've been using an extremely simple home-brewn version in a couple of
> projects, and it's extremely addictive, at least if you're a C/C++ veteran...)
weave is alive and kicking and actively use
my current codebase[1] isn't going to
be supported in Python 3000, I'm going to want the Python developers to
use that opportunity to the fullest advantage to make a better language.
[1] By which I mean the sum total of the code that I use not just code
that I've personally written.
argument ((x**y) % z),
which is necessary for really large numbers like the ones you play with
in cryptography.
--
Robert Kern
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"In the fields of hell where the grass grows high
Are the graves of dreams allowed to die."
-- Rich
;s license, all parties to whom the program is
redistributed should have the same rights as those that are granted in
conjunction with the original software distribution.
"""
I'm not entirely sure if this affects the PSF's use of OSI's trademark.
IANAL. TINLA.
--
Robert Ke
ntation that is identified in the RFC as being
copyrighted.
[etc.]
--
Robert Kern
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"In the fields of hell where the grass grows high
Are the graves of dreams allowed to die."
-- Richard Harter
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Py
piler.
Extension, and yes it does something similarly stupid.
--
Robert Kern
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"In the fields of hell where the grass grows high
Are the graves of dreams allowed to die."
-- Richard Harter
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@
97 matches
Mail list logo
